[時事討論] 保護消費人法案一旦通過‧停車場須對汽車負責 ， 描述： 消費的我们对此事有和看法？？

amgo

对！非常赞成5.39.217.76+ P$ k* ^9 b/ n/ h, L: n& L
地方是你们的，但是钱是我们给的，为何还不负责任！
2 q& T6 G6 @; i+ s7 j. ^) _5.39.217.76本来停车就不只是租个车位而已！

KLSEE

举脚赞成，但一旦通过此法案，停车场负责人难免会以保护汽车安全为藉口，乘机提高停车费

neveraskme89

早就该酱办啦！什么park at your own risk?!根本就是无理取闹！给了那么贵的钱！尤其在KL！还要酱对我们？

knightrider82

i think only car the car insurans company and the stupid car park centre will disagree only.公仔箱論壇2 W/ B$ D* `" i4 n- R( n
for all the ppl that drive and park sure will 120% agree with that,we pay for the parking rate no matter they charge hour or daily,some more they did't give a nice attitude for it,showing those black face to us when we try ask.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb  K$ d: g" G" w. \' N
sometime car got steel from the parking area,sure they must take respon on it.1 o* F* r% p) a+ {
some more i being park my car at kl area most happening shopping mall then get scathe on my car body and i go find them to ask bout it,they just tell me that" i don't know when it happen,this car park is like this 1,got problem car owner must take it own risk"
! L) I( t4 R5 a, L/ TNOT FAIR