well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.
& k) Q; _* k+ q) c: d
, @* n3 ?: {. G6 g; v- y9 Ktvb now,tvbnow,bttvbi have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.
7 S, M4 b% m0 |4 h2 otvb now,tvbnow,bttvb1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.
1 D2 }2 y8 g! a% W, |% U5.39.217.762. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing. |