[時事討論] 保護消費人法案一旦通過‧停車場須對汽車負責 ， 描述： 消費的我们对此事有和看法？？

amgo

对！非常赞成
7 i2 m* ?' w# T; |tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb地方是你们的，但是钱是我们给的，为何还不负责任！公仔箱論壇$ L4 W2 n) K! Y6 F# f7 E# {) L
本来停车就不只是租个车位而已！

KLSEE

举脚赞成，但一旦通过此法案，停车场负责人难免会以保护汽车安全为藉口，乘机提高停车费

neveraskme89

早就该酱办啦！什么park at your own risk?!根本就是无理取闹！给了那么贵的钱！尤其在KL！还要酱对我们？

knightrider82

i think only car the car insurans company and the stupid car park centre will disagree only.
4 N: k% ~4 \3 O- N1 L% }5.39.217.76for all the ppl that drive and park sure will 120% agree with that,we pay for the parking rate no matter they charge hour or daily,some more they did't give a nice attitude for it,showing those black face to us when we try ask.2 ^9 s/ }6 D3 \9 u( T
sometime car got steel from the parking area,sure they must take respon on it.
/ F& w8 B8 R6 _* d6 x  A/ |$ Hsome more i being park my car at kl area most happening shopping mall then get scathe on my car body and i go find them to ask bout it,they just tell me that" i don't know when it happen,this car park is like this 1,got problem car owner must take it own risk"9 \- ^1 G9 z, d" C4 p  H7 K, ~$ E- L
NOT FAIR