返回列表 回復 發帖

[時事討論] 吳靄儀: 29年前舊文章

本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2013-4-10 10:32 AM 編輯
- h' ?" p) M( z. o: a1 X- m' P
' ~: n$ d6 W9 P% MTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。吳靄儀: 29年前舊文章
3 ^/ s. s: v6 `6 g7 _公仔箱論壇% M: {; _% A7 `
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。8 e: T& h# ^; A6 x; t
公仔箱論壇% V: P* [. ]3 s5 r
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb' t$ `; `2 ]* y$ d5 j
      
/ y! P) k  o# W% S/ y3 ?( y0 P8 o4 @! etvb now,tvbnow,bttvb戴卓爾夫人逝世,在香港喚起的最大的回憶,自是她在中英就香港前途談判的角色功過。經歷過這段歷史的一代香港人,各有自己刻骨銘心的體驗。" f2 E% N( \. ^& j5 ]
      
8 T% Z, x6 T  Q  bTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。我記得1984年2、3月,消息傳到仍是寒風徹骨的劍橋,中英談判在1月已有決定性的發展,英方全面放棄97後在香港有任何角色。這個消息,對於我們這一批一直藉着向英方施壓,要求英方在談判桌上維護香港前途的人來說,是個打擊也是個解脫。我們既害怕中共的管治,也不屑倚賴英廷的蔭庇,如今,我們被迫要長大了,與其擔憂來日的不可測,不如勇敢面對,積極計劃,創建未來。
  J& f7 V" g% H3 ?; V0 c( n! N公仔箱論壇        
' s' ~1 e& L( d2 R那時,我在《南華早報》寫專欄,回到宿舍,我就寫了“Now We Stand Alone” ,寫出了在我心目中為保存香港的自由法治,我們必須建立的民主制度,呼籲香港人負起這個責任,利用這容易飛逝的13載光陰。
& p+ t1 D  d7 e2 C5.39.217.76        公仔箱論壇& X  r' \) S4 S. X
這篇文章震撼了保守的《南早》,一向很支持我的總編輯Robin Hutcheon起初也不肯刋登,我越洋跟他吵了一場,決絕地說他不登,我就改投Hong Kong Standard。後來,不知他如何說服了什麼人,居然就刋登了,但「轉會」已不能挽回。
9 k, |3 Z( p0 i7 @% v( ATVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。        5.39.217.76- t7 Q7 g6 c9 ~& R$ ?
29年過去了,重看這篇一直保存的文章,感慨自己一直未改變過,香港的局勢也未改變過。其實,中英談判,英方注定是要輸的,因為沒有任何一個英國首相會負起對香港的道義責任,容許所有在香港出生的女皇陛下的子民自動享有居英權。中方同樣注定只能全面恢復行使主權,不然就是中華民族的千古罪人。大部分香港人一面擔憂中共政權,另一面又說不出口要延長殖民地管治。支持回歸,反對向外國人「乞求」居留權,其實餘下的一途就是自救,奮力參與政治建立起民主制度。為此,我29年前說,我們要預備好付出代價。也許,吳靄儀被打成「港獨」份子,就是這篇文章闖的禍。
+ h$ {0 b0 ^) r" y7 s+ `! X7 Stvb now,tvbnow,bttvb; `  t: q# ?; x" l8 w$ `* M) w1 W
        tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb: f- G( u" m7 d7 F
29年後重看文章,訊息無改,我自己一往無悔,只是機會已隨時光消逝了。也許我們從來都沒有希望,像我這樣的人,只不過是書生做夢。
! N: A% v. n0 ?TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。
; D  t. R3 q6 |* V+ @* p5.39.217.76        5.39.217.764 x, ]# C! W9 X  v. Z7 c5 O
編按:“Now We Stand Alone”刊於1984年3月28日出版的《南華早報》,全文如下:tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb( B' ^' i" Q- H2 h5 d' l  W
It's our home, our future, our battle and we must take the banner in our own hands Now we stand alone
* f$ r4 x3 ~2 S7 lTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。- Q8 h* _" ^0 x0 c. l! A* A, h6 X
                We are at the brink of a new era. Hongkong politics since January has become a whole new ball game.
, D1 Y0 a& K+ F5 _/ T% t" m( \6 l! C3 HTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。                The faint hearted will do well to drop out. Those who stay must be prepared for swift action without a chance to look back.' p. \6 \$ \1 l: \) t# v
公仔箱論壇' _2 X& h1 c$ K: I
                Thirteen years will fly past like a whiff: we cannot afford to drag our feet if we want anything done. But these 13 years will be a very good time to do things in; for our hands are now united.
9 I4 y1 ], n; I- n; Z: [8 Q5.39.217.76
0 W) m1 W- Z! p公仔箱論壇                No more the need to compromise with the establishment and keep silent in the hope of giving peace a chance; no more the fear that embarrassing one or the other party will bring on irreplaceable harm.公仔箱論壇* |7 J0 Y4 }. Y7 i# y8 \& g( [' N& K
' e! [1 v' }+ p7 k6 ^6 X
                There is no point now in holding on to the old order. Freely we go into the dark, to forge from it a new one.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。2 Y$ ?8 T3 b6 t# t, a/ y5 T
                What unbinds us is the indubitable fact that Britain has given up the territory.: S% L9 {+ f1 b/ Q7 I" `* S
公仔箱論壇- H) ?- r) Q0 ?" e! x
                Before and up to January the ironic situation was that Britain was the best champion of our free society, to argue our case so that we will remain outside the communist regime of the PRC.公仔箱論壇, T) s& \" j# c* l
                It made sense then to rally round the colonial Government, to maintain staunchly in the teeth of accusations of sycophancy and betrayal of the Chinese race, that it was better to be a Colony and free than Chinese and under state dictatorship.
$ }8 v1 J0 V7 g2 w5.39.217.765.39.217.76* g2 o4 A  q, n6 Y% C/ ~8 F2 Z+ v
                After January there is no point in doing so. As Britain had given up on us, we must give up Britain.公仔箱論壇5 y. p& M) Z9 r* E
                Likewise, before January it made sense to refrain from saying or doing anything which might antagonise China.
0 Z/ ]: F9 ]8 o: d3 j公仔箱論壇                There was wisdom in the belief that if we could pretend everything was going well then everything would. Making it easier for China to prolong the status quo was the right thing to do.
  J1 S* B6 y2 K1 d4 c& [$ KTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。                Now we know for sure where we stand with China. The writing is no longer on the wall but in the files for record.
% S- z7 j, ]. d6 I' x& F                Thus we have arrived at a stage when we have no more champions or protector.  We must now take the banner in our own hands — or all is lost. 公仔箱論壇& e. s' P# l& U/ h/ Z) v

/ G& V8 w, d, Ttvb now,tvbnow,bttvb                The bold motion of Legco that no plan for the territory be finalised without open debate by the council is a slightly delayed reaction to this realization.
2 L4 G5 P2 [, Q, o公仔箱論壇                Last year, the press berated bitterly and repeatedly the silence of Legco members, the supposed leaders of our community.5.39.217.761 V) p/ w+ Z! _/ F3 o/ J$ K/ B& a
                Silence was the price they paid in consideration for a better chance to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion on our future at the negotiation table.  Must not make trouble for it might jeopardize that chance.

8 `5 n0 o/ C! i, L3 YTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。                They co-operated with the British Government because they sincerely believed co-operation was the best bet.  They may have judged wrongly and acted clumsily, but in the case of most of the councilors the motivation was undoubtedly unexceptionable.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。; t: P$ x; j- z# f
                In the face of the latest development that silence has not only become pointless, but dangerous. Every sector is responding with lively interest to the agreement of China resuming sovereignty in 1997 and thereafter giving Hong Kong a 50-year period of grace, and everyone is asking how a new leadership may emerge.
) {$ l" C7 {# p$ H8 o& t7 F5.39.217.76                For Legco to maintain silence and a low profile further will be absurd, and that absurdity will cost them their leadership.  They will be left in the cold, and that position will be intolerable to them.5.39.217.76( J$ J, r. V) @1 m" g. Z
                For the good of Hong Kong Legco must not become an absurd show of empty gestures.  It must gain strength and transform itself into the democratic body that can really rule the territory.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb; _) o0 k0 i4 |$ f3 v
                This is the least disruptive and surest way to a strong and stable new leadership, achieved not by the creation of utopia founded on elaborate theories, but by improving what we have got.
7 A4 I& A* j" h, K" g4 |公仔箱論壇                We do not need a New Territories Regional Council; we do not need any more intermediate, purely-administrative bodies that merely enlarge the bureaucracy, take up time and cause even greater delays. % p0 E$ b& b* m" v$ d
                The time for a mild dosage of participation without actually going so far as to annoy China or affect colonial authority has passed.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。/ Q6 D3 I9 R1 [3 D" N3 ~
                The people must have real political power now, in the simplest, most direct way possible.5.39.217.76% a; R; Q0 v6 \/ e: [: Z
                And we must fight for this power, for of his own accord the Chief Secretary is not going to give us democracy if we wait 100 years.
1 F7 g+ U3 K- k! Dtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb                The development of Legco in the past few years first showed a trend of opening up, gaining confidence and assuming real importance as a body which scrutinizes Government policies and the functioning of Government departments. 公仔箱論壇4 `6 s, ^! D5 N# H& Z; [
                It has not exactly done the job with uniform brilliance and efficacy but on the whole it has been moving in the right direction, until recently.
3 a' p0 u2 j% N3 S+ N% D, G+ yTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。                What has happened within the past year is the gradual shift of power.  The pressure to open up Legco to elected membership and the Government’s reluctance to do so, resulted in the compromise of admitting a few elected district board members into the council.
3 ?3 w9 O" u5 |1 \tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb                Meanwhile a few outspoken younger Unofficials were moved up into the Executive Committee.
/ j. `9 A6 N2 Z! O/ I4 `+ A3 ?# O                What this means is that we are heading for a system of district boards which have little constitutional power and have failed to gain any in the period following their establishment; a Legislative Council acquiring on the one hand “safe” grassroots representatives who have as yet made little impact and on the other, for exactly the reason of these acquisitions, being made less close to Government decisions; and the Executive Council which now is everything on its way to being the only thing that really matters.
; w$ o/ Y* n: I. T' m3 I                Here is demonstrated the well-known Parkinson ’s Law about where power resides: as lower councils grow to admit more, power shifts upwards to the next highest conclave. If and when this conclave grows again, a new higher or upper conclave will be created.
3 L, E! {+ ~6 W2 T+ P1 G6 o4 K3 s+ _tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb                The Government is now talking about more participation and possibly holding Legco elections.
/ e' ]/ Z& i7 i. d5 T6 N                Let us beware and remember this one important fact: there is no point in having elections if Legco’s power is undermined.
) l* t! |/ Y- u1 V0 a3 P; V5.39.217.76                Elections are worthwhile only if Legco has real power.
6 \( l' f' m) }8 }4 N# O) gtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb                For the purpose of running up to self-government Legco should be more powerful, not less.  Indeed it makes sense to make a reconstituted Legco the heart of our political structure.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。3 o' W+ ?1 C  I! F+ ?% S* ^! J
                A direct link should be formed between Legco and the district boards which would advise Legco.5.39.217.76; Y3 V8 L3 q; W$ M# a
                The Executive Council, rather than being above Legco, should be held accountable to it in much the same way as the cabinet should be accountable to parliament. 0 L6 A# }* U( l$ W
                I say “should be” because we must do better than Britain where the cabinet dominates parliament to a large extent.
1 w: r- Y% k% c5 }. O# {3 v                And in between — Legco, the district boards, and Exco-Legco — there should be no imtermediate bodies.  The links must be direct if the system is to be effective.公仔箱論壇. ?  ]3 `: P- d! D* |
                The bodies whose position will be anomalous to this system are the Urban Council and the Heung Yee Kuk.
% U6 s3 i- r/ p: H& A# i                Under the placating philosophy of the Government they have been kept, though the government hoped to erode their roles with the district board system.
$ }) X, M9 d6 ~" `, E2 ^5 T) `                The Government of course did not succeed, and will not ever succeed with on the one hand its fear of their opposition and on the other its reluctance to give anybody real power.
5 t; |4 |8 Q" ^" v( D: ^6 n5.39.217.76                But these bodies must go now as separate organisations.  Their present leaders should take their places in the new Legco as individuals representing large interest groups. If they have the backing, let them try to dominate Legco.  They will see that this gives them more power, not less. 公仔箱論壇6 U$ o6 m- Z8 k( t  S
                The detailed composition of the new Legco needs careful thinking, but it is difficult to see how appointed membership can exist there without anomaly.) V! w6 V+ I0 l7 G
                The continued existence of official members seemed to be defensible and indeed helpful, but we cannot now accept a superior authority appointing unofficials.
. [2 d" k1 M- f" r6 M2 B/ c, O                The only legitimate source of appointment will be by election.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb6 |* Y+ z' @2 E  j+ r
                But there should be no artificial and indeed no more limitations than absolutely necessary.  The only acceptable criterion for membership is excellence.8 T- O2 ?  n; c1 P9 q8 n
                If by a process of election we do not end up with the best people who are willing to serve, well then it serves us right.
; O' v, [3 q" [7 q: I5 s5.39.217.76                To have one kind of elections by district, namely for the district boards, is good enough.  We need the best people we have got, and the system must facilitate their surfacing.
3 |3 L; A# W1 c3 U  oTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。
2 |' O5 |0 q: N                Where is our new leadership to come from? This is the crux of the matter.  And we need to answer that question fast.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。& ]) V$ M& M3 }5 {
                I have always had my doubts about democracy, the election process and claims of representation of the people.
& C1 R1 i6 p% W0 h                There is no question that elections favour every time the diligently self-motivated ambitious more than the high-minded who are more concerned with serving the public than manipulating it to elect them.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。6 Y" x1 a% ]3 {
                I dislike the rule of the majority because the triumphant majority is so apt to disregard the rights of the minority.9 G. ?3 o0 a, b1 o4 t( ^, `" z1 R
                Yet at the end of the day we have no better choice than democracy.  Humanity has not yet invented a better system, and so we must stick to this.
" Q4 H8 B- l  l( Q7 w) R; ^5.39.217.76公仔箱論壇. v5 E& |% q; g1 W
                A year ago, I would have said that appointed unofficials were a good idea because some people who were willing to serve and who had something to contribute were not always good at electioneering or could afford the time or money to campaign.
0 |4 i5 n* h; n! b公仔箱論壇                Now I would say, if you want to serve the people, go out to the streets and win them.  If you do not learn about power, your ideas are worth very little.  If you are not prepared to stand for elections, then you must be prepared to stay outside the governing body.  The time has come to get tough.
3 }5 f' O; ?$ q$ g% e9 g# ^TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。                What is the above a blueprint of? It is a blueprint of self-government for Hong Kong, to be achieved within the next, short, 13 years.公仔箱論壇- z8 i% |- D! k
" Q  \  L2 f) f% Q
                Even assuming that there is agreement on that system, there may be a fundamental difference of attitudes as to how we should aim at governing.
2 H5 j( i7 I6 M% `. T公仔箱論壇                Given that after 1997 China will assume sovereignty; given that China will then give us the 50-year period of autonomy or near autonomy; China intends that Hongkong become a part of the great socialist system in the long run.  What will be the aim of the Government we shall have formed?, O# N: ^: z. v% A7 f/ A/ _
                Two attitudes are possible: co-operation and resistance. The co-operative attitude aims at gradually bringing Hongkong closer to China in terms of government, political ideology, style of living, cultural life, involvement in Chinese politics, acceptance of Chinese leadership and the like.
) }& @' N0 f+ E" b+ e0 Q                The emphasis of education will change to promote that aim.  More and more people from the mainland will come to Hongkong to study, work, live and make holiday; more putonghua will be heard and spoken, more official visits of Chinese leaders, more visible participation of Chinese investment in the Hongkong market.
& x9 @* v. B1 ?# V                The achievement is that we should hardly feel it when we become socialist rather than capitalist, nationals of the PRC rather than citizens of Hongkong. tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb! [, @0 d& L+ t7 I: Q' d% l
                The attitude of resistance aims, on the contrary, at safeguarding the loss of our identity with the loss of our liberty.
+ _# E2 `3 h! [& y7 l                Its motto will be “no reunification without autonomy,” and under this motto self-government will direct itself to strengthen those institutions which safeguards our liberty, by developing the democratic system of active participation in government, by removing the obstacles to open criticism and freedom of expression, by accustoming people to regard these as their rights and by building up a tradition of political involvement.
% s" g* g6 W2 A5.39.217.76                Political leaders, no less than the public, shall have to learn to accept democracy and abide by its rules.公仔箱論壇3 w) l' n8 P5 E. p% Y
                We shall need a strong leadership supported by a public which is aware of its rights and informed about Government policies and the way Government operates.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb5 L- o, z3 |% [
                The last thing we need is a horrendous scramble for power ending in messy confusion or factionism, and the public blown hither and thither because it does not know what is going on or what it wants.
3 A& z9 ]. t. @0 T* ^- x: ]4 D; P- ~TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。                The worst is the most likely to happen, given our present apathy, ignorance and ambivalence, not to mention the wonderful plans of some of our most senior Government officials.
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% q" ]* c% `: C. f6 h
                But we must resist all these —  our own inner reluctance as well as the Government officials.
8 \* _6 s; Z# T6 T/ D/ Z                For, Hongkong is no longer anybody else's home or anyone else’s battle but our own, and 13 years is a short time.
' p" R! D! w. P3 n" T; B                We cannot afford to waste even a minute of it.
* k- U; p/ w; G1 htvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
  
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2013-4-10 10:20 AM 編輯
$ h5 D7 W+ W* c9 d4 c* e2 |tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb! m/ ~$ A: F3 y, W
李怡: 香港核心價值是中共權貴的敵人' U: j4 V% e2 O- ?7 U, \6 t" ?9 t. `
- |9 ?" ~) J% w# B! a
公仔箱論壇: ~$ K3 T9 y- l8 I, \1 k" M
港大的政改民調,對於2017年特首選舉,須由提名委員會「整體提名」、即篩選後才讓市民一人一票選特首,反對此意見的有43%,但支持的比率也有39%。有認為支持者屬建制派「鐵票」,不過更大的可能性是受訪者不太明白提名委員會是由非民主的方式組成,也不太知道提名委員會的篩選是由中央掌控,就如同去年的特首選舉一樣。很多人會認為,既然《基本法》規定由提名委員會提名,也就「依法」支持了。公仔箱論壇* Q9 X& I% {+ j7 |4 J
公仔箱論壇5 w/ d9 T& @5 I2 B' k+ Y
自喬曉陽提出特首候選人必須「愛國愛港」及提名委員會「整體提名」這個超級保險套之後,建制派和商界較少人開聲支持。只有一些傳統親共的「老愛國」赤膊上馬,胡言亂語講甚麼普及而平等不包含「被選權」,一國之下「(唔係)香港想選乜人就乜人」,其中梁愛詩講得最清楚,她恐嚇市民,如「蠢到」選一個與中央對抗的特首,便「唔好怪中央嘅反應係點樣」,亦「無得怨」。公仔箱論壇2 n5 u) j0 ?" F0 M& N- N

6 W4 q; c/ R; D2 S$ R, N) w$ [「中央嘅反應係點樣?」按照《基本法》,大不了就是不任命,再重選。這個代價香港人付得起,而中央恐怕付不起,因為這會成為國際的最大笑話。世界各國地方上經普選產生的領導人,中央政府沒有不任命的,因為任命只是形式,不任命就意味不尊重選民意向了。
" v3 R9 N9 s: k# f) `公仔箱論壇

2 q3 H! S/ V- p" aTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。中共要在香港搞假普選,發起佔領中環及支持這壯舉的人士都早已估到,否則就不會在未見有政改諮詢前就提出佔中。中共為排除佔中對假普選的抗拒,也就搶先拋出普選底線。現在是中共及香港極端親共人士(包括愛港力之類),與香港積極支持民主的社會力量在輿論上較勁,而在《基本法》中負有責任的特府反見龜縮。
2 v& X( z9 G4 KTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。

' A% W; W" Z( E& ^8 {% u( nTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。除了「中央不任命」這一招之外,恐嚇言論還有就是佔中會癱瘓香港經濟。中共原以為這一論述會受到香港商界支持,但想不到商界對支持或反對都冷淡,李嘉誠在記者會也避而不談。又由於發起佔中者表示會和平進行,甚至會讓出一條車路,使中環交通不致癱瘓。這樣,就連當局想恫嚇暴力鎮壓都師出無名了。公仔箱論壇" ?$ b2 R" N* A+ ]! c9 M: v: ^1 P

' F3 k4 {9 Y: J3 ^9 U( Y那麼,佔中的意義何在?就在於引起全中國和全世界的關注,是要表達香港人不能再忍受中共的專權政治掌控特首人選,在香港實行劣質管治,使我們原來的高文明的社會趨於沉淪。
% y# ^% ?7 M& C1 S& i: l+ x
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。+ I& P; s6 l! V
另一個對佔中的恐嚇言論,是佔中不會成功,因為中央不會就範。
0 R. `$ X# e3 F) t# s8 W1 ~! m5.39.217.76

2 N4 D5 ^! C$ i+ z: U$ X' i2 T' p) \5.39.217.76泛民中有人一直對中共抱有幻想,他們看到《人民日報》海外版較持平地報道泛民對喬曉陽「底線說」的意見,就說中共「行前一步」了,但這篇報道早上發出,中午就在網上刪除,說明這只是編採人員打的擦邊球,刊出屬意外,並非表示中央態度有變。
! I) X5 M( D, C+ Y3 _: ytvb now,tvbnow,bttvb

1 }- u% W6 n0 t3 U) {; [" p" `5.39.217.76泛民中也有人苦口婆心地勸告中央不要錯判形勢,要實行真普選才能有良好管治,避免香港的自由法治、繁榮穩定淪喪。5.39.217.765 |' z2 N" E1 ^2 Z
公仔箱論壇. ^) x/ ?6 k% u4 s' {# F+ r/ w( \
對中共近年狀況有所了解的梁文道,前天在一個對談中表示,對於中共來說,是「寧可香港死,也不放生你」。因為中共已蛻變成「國家支持的權貴資本主義」,中共權貴和它卵翼下的各級特權階層,掌權、撈錢、轉移資產和子女到國外,自己在大陸做「裸官」,殘酷盤剝九成以上的老百姓,這就是現在中國的政治經濟社會結構。梁文道認為中共領導人不是真心考慮共產黨延續,只是追逐既得利益者的短線利益,因此中共未來不會政改,而且不想香港有真普選以免引起大陸社會的反應。
: Y$ _- p# t' B

0 ~. X  A$ C3 b) X+ I$ q7 N認為「中共無政改,香港無普選」的人,是注定無希望了。0 H2 F* H" H" k' `8 _* U5 X9 b% g

5 q% G* q* X: |規勸中共若在香港搞假普選,會影響台灣接受一國兩制,這想法也早就過時。台灣已沒甚麼人再談一國兩制,台灣的自主早就確立,中共近年也接受這現實,領導人跟台灣人見面不再提統一了。
, k. N$ Q% q' |. r% ?% U9 Ntvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
5.39.217.769 j* O2 h, f  o6 w% ~
中共怕香港搞真普選會引起大陸反應,其實這不是中共主要考慮。因為大陸人更認命,在《基本法》發表時他們已經接受香港有不同體制了。) o' O4 T* o5 q+ [; R" P8 c5 P
( P4 h4 s* t$ ]4 o
中共不想在香港實行真普選,原因之一是共產黨歷來把權力看得比甚麼都重,但更重要則是要保護現已成形的權貴階層的利益。他們要在香港持續大規模洗錢,把香港作為轉移財產,和移居家屬子女往國外的中轉站,他們不能容忍香港有一個自主的、會抗拒內地各方面侵蝕的掌權者。香港的自由法治廉政,是中共權貴階層的敵人。民主將保障核心價值,而香港核心價值的沉淪,對中共權貴來說正是好事。梁文道說:「香港市場冧,他便來掃便宜貨。」
2 L/ d' t  S6 N3 y+ @3 \公仔箱論壇

8 }$ F4 c3 }7 J1 w1 @" k% G5.39.217.76中共不會在普選上讓步,幾乎是肯定的。那麼我們為甚麼還要爭?因為我們是已經進入文明社會的人,因為我們不甘心從自由人變回奴隸,因為我們有人格,有尊嚴,有道德,因為我們要爭回一個文明人應有的政治權利。從更長遠的視野去看,我們會贏。
; b. G4 G8 p  mtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。1 G, m. p! ~5 q# s# x* R8 ]

; |( J% X: T5 r6 W( m  y- I5 M; Xtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb公仔箱論壇0 |6 D5 h" }& F  [4 i* L4 D

2 V6 x; r( q6 V- s
  
呂大樂:港人愈益重視特首認受性
6 W5 M/ H/ y0 a5 wtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb5.39.217.76- w: [- v( l$ q
在學術討論的意義上,這是一個老掉牙的題目,但在現實的政治生活中,它卻又是一個很實在的、而且反覆出現的問題——特區政府的政治認受性。最近有一種意見認為,此乃無中生有的問題,若然以一個歷史的、制度的、法則的角度來看,又或者從國家的高度來考慮這個問題,則應該不難明白,其實香港並非獨立的政 治實體,而特區政府所要取得的政治授權亦並非(或起碼並不單只是)來自於香港市民。
1 x0 l8 K% O1 J% B+ f3 Y; i5 r) h* atvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
0 k6 e3 I5 t: ]$ F9 J
持這種觀點的人認為,提出現時特區政府的政治認受性不 足,再而認為有需要進行民主改革者,有混淆視聽之嫌,是藉目前特區政府管治威信低落,社會支持度薄弱而進行的政治攻擊;他們最新的想法甚至覺得過去的特區政府領導亦多少受到這類批評的影響,怯於面對群眾而未能理直氣壯地依法施政。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。0 Z* i$ {9 t% H; p  h9 i4 b9 b

6 v. J# \; J5 }8 B6 K8 WTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。只突顯中央任命權力
5 s, \9 Y1 B3 f+ ^* c* N
  p/ j5 h. a" M+ \. J! D
這一種新意見的形成,本身就是一個值得留意的現象。在政改辯論及相關爭議隨時一觸即發的時刻,各大陣營自然各自忙於在社會上準備如何爭取話語、論述的主導權,急忙推出一套理解香港社會、政治發展的框架。在廣義的建制一方,新論述的重點在於強調「一國」這個大前提,界定「一國兩制」底下的中港關係,其實是中央與地方的關 係。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。1 J8 D* E% H" a) d: y# q( X

$ C9 G* T% a4 n* D公仔箱論壇由這個立場出發,他們於政治程序上突顯中央的任命權(因此開動未來特首必須「愛國愛港」的討論),以及特首的地位和角色(因此強調特首須要配合、其實是服從中央領導的工作,由儀式上的參與,以及支持到於重大事情上的服從),旨在加強「一國」的訊息。同樣,他們嘗試否定政治認受性的問題, 重點在於把特首的政治授權,由市民的支持轉到程序上的中央任命之上。在目前正在逐步升溫的政改辯論中,核心議題在於如何理解和操作「一國兩制」。這是建制一方從不同方面去塑造一個突顯「一國」為一切討論基礎的背景。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb. n  g& P! w, @! Y

7 h4 N0 J$ c: ?$ s& x3 {5.39.217.76究竟特區政府的政治認受性是否一個無中生有的問題,筆者自問是法律門外漢,有 關《基本法》條文及其法理上的意義,願聽專家解釋。不過,當前有關香港政治制度未來發展的問題,又不僅是一個法律問題;要認真進行討論,我們不可能把政制抽離於社會文化環境,以為依文件上的文字便能自我解釋(當然,我們也知道,這一點也有爭議之處),便等於可以服眾。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。) u; R+ G  e1 }* v# ~6 V
5.39.217.760 A* }+ R5 @, t4 H
現時很多人忙於回到文獻裏頭——重讀鄧小平的一些講話、翻開八十年代的經驗……,以為這樣便可展示對「一國兩制」和中港關係的「正確」理解,便可平息爭議。在我看來,這注定是徒勞無功的。要積極為香港各種問題找尋答案,我們須要做的,不是回到過去,而是放眼將來。公仔箱論壇, q( a, @! f6 F9 @

: ^6 |8 x( _4 T8 O" f須正視港人政治期望
! y  v" f; \- Y6 |" z
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb' v# }/ l* _; o
這把我們的討論引回到首段提及學術上有關政治認受性的分析。所謂認受性,可從兩個方面來看:一是當權者憑什麼(例如傳統、合法程序或個人魅力)、或自稱以哪一種基礎而獲取政治權力的正當性;一是從人民眼睛來看這個政治認受性的問題,這就是說,就算有人有方法可以為一個限制一人一票選舉具決定性作用的政治過程 解釋過去,我們還須考慮,究竟一般市民是否就會接受那個政府領導層的管治和施政呢?市民於主觀上如何理解政府領導層施政的權力來源,乃一個政府管治的社會基礎。
3 `  \0 A1 t+ t/ H8 v8 Q
  u. \! ^  l' {) k" K6 m: t8 p( K
當然,到了今天仍會有人認為,一般平民百姓根本就不認為政治是他們管得了的事情,而且也不會發問如「政府憑什麼推出(或反對推出)某些政策」之類的問題。持這類觀點的人認為,在過去十五年的特區管治裏,老百姓或偶爾有所不滿,但只要讓他們消消氣,便不會有什麼大問題,市民的不滿從來沒 有轉化為更高的要求與期望。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。1 i* l  F5 z3 q, C& T

5 Y" w3 Y' X' d  ]$ TTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。對於這類見解,本人實在不敢苟同。他們基本上依然拒絕正面面對香港2003年七一大遊行以後出現的政治環境,以 為只要特區政府提高一下施政能力、改善形象,便足以把政府與社會的關係撥回九七前那種低度互動、相互之間沒有什麼撞擊的狀態;其實,只要我們到各個社區跑一圈,便不難發覺他們的假設或理解極之不切實際。
: _7 ?0 o: ?: G5.39.217.76
  b* L5 G( ]  @$ L2 G* l: Z. itvb now,tvbnow,bttvb無論北京如何不喜歡或認為難以接受,今天的香港人肯定認為特首要向他們負責,並且須要獲得最起碼的認同。政治認受性不單不是一個假問題,而且只會變得愈來愈重要。着眼未來,還是正視香港市民的政治期望與訴求,方為上策也。7 b# i/ M! ]2 \4 Q) K/ E

" D6 H! ^4 V) o% B$ m, z3 d
0 D/ K" \4 y4 n' `& ~8 ~5.39.217.76作者為香港大學社會學系教授5.39.217.769 D5 {& L( C+ G9 U. e2 b
. z! L  q& y! j3 U; O0 ?2 f
1

評分次數

  • aa00

  
返回列表