返回列表 回復 發帖
1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,
, @! o3 p8 K; Ywithout the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern well' @7 [& Q$ C$ S. J

" U  T4 m9 Z# X, k' lTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。anyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question
返回列表