l0709394

1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,0 \3 P( o$ S! m: S
without the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern well
5 g: q  f! h9 h, k# y- Q
6 n$ V4 B' v5 B公仔箱論壇anyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question