返回列表 回復 發帖
1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,
8 ]$ I& Y* F5 [8 ]+ ?. l5 ptvb now,tvbnow,bttvbwithout the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern welltvb now,tvbnow,bttvb; Z* m9 u6 S( x4 s

, Q, z- d; x- b. [公仔箱論壇anyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question
返回列表