返回列表 回復 發帖
1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,8 k8 {3 o* }& ~7 g- [) k
without the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern welltvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% J& k4 b$ v4 ]

. L3 G) G$ s' u- i$ V& G5.39.217.76anyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question
返回列表