1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,
# d+ }( ^/ ^' Bwithout the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern well
/ |3 U% D) Z9 `( g- y9 S' y- W( y; jTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。) V" P5 M. {# t- a) J( W% c
anyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question |
發表於 2007-4-9 03:39 PM
| 