 
|
3#
發表於 2011-11-1 01:22 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
本帖最後由 norman.ho 於 2011-11-2 06:39 AM 編輯 TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。1 y( @+ j4 ^5 @, E; K6 T# d
# i E, I# ^. j5 m/ Y9 ?+ @6 h! wTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Reading your comment, I can't help but to think you were reminiscing the "good old time" of the colonial rule. (I could be completely wrong here). 公仔箱論壇6 B6 H: r/ O5 P* _$ {3 Y
Yes, I read that during the early 70s, there was a stable economy(no global financial crisis then, not even the Asian crisis), many people got rich investing in real estate and those who were with the police. But I also read that corruption was rampant, the police were under the payroll of the Triads, drugs dealing and forced prostitution were everywhere.
, |) W3 _# Z" ?) Q5.39.217.76 The Governor then was appointed by the Crown. And the majority of the Executive Council members were directly appointed by the Governor. There were less than a handful of seats that were elected, and the right to vote was highly controlled and confined to a few of the privileged.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb& z1 U* a7 d/ v; s0 \
The Government then, by maintain the absolute authority, could dictate policies, there were no minimum wages, no social security, and there were only 2 universities. For HK students to get into the university there, it was 20 times harder compare with the Brits gaining admission to Oxford or Cambridge.
' X' `; Q% f0 I, @' I1 |, L2 H; E公仔箱論壇Not till the early 80s, the Brits realize they had no chance of keeping maintaining the colonial rule, and with the very last appointed governor, Chris Patten, who started this so call social reform, advocating social democracy, providing financial support for the aged and unemployed ... etc, etc.
$ E) I! ?7 p$ q" a+ M; f" HTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。If the Brits were to maintain the colonial rule of HK, do you think this so call "democratic reform" would have happened?
1 L' D$ l7 j; r7 R, Q5.39.217.76Hong Kong has always thought itself superior and unique in the area of economy and social reform, and a model for China—not a recipient of its handouts. This changing role is difficult for many to understand, let alone to accept.
X3 W% Z/ e5 s+ g+ B4 \tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbDemocratic development is seldom an orderly process that follows straight lines. What Hong Kong experiences is little different from what happens in any community that moves rapidly from authoritarian rule to open elections, complete with checks and balances among different branches of government.5.39.217.76# l+ Z( o3 D0 V; g& B) y7 `
The reason I try to draw some parallel of the political development of the Singapore government is, when I was little, I heard of a lot of discontent of the Singaporean Government, there were comments like Lee Kwong Yew was a dictator, a tyrant, there were no journalistic freedom, any opposition parties were being quickly stifled.
/ n A I/ d2 f% I7 x8 KEven now Singapore is still not a true democratic government, but we all know is that it is a very stable and well functioning society.* |& u7 [0 U- p G3 n8 a1 Y1 g6 `8 h
My point is "Democracy" is only one of the political models; it is definitely not a one size fit all system, and there are many variants. These different democratic models may suit many of the western culture, but it certain can't be just imposed onto any countries which might have a different political culture and different set of social values.9 A* \3 R# r# u4 q
+ ?: L$ y! ]: b* ^. eTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Got to go, to be cont .... |
-
1
評分次數
-
A little green earthling, living life as if there were no tomorrow. |
|