samhau

「暫時失明」這點很有保留. 不少軍警引入新型「非致命武器」都聲稱沒有永久傷害, 但後果總會發現有後遺症. 這次只不過是借機引入新的強力武器方便執法. 對民權往往弊多於利.

samhau

well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.
4 j+ W# O% M3 p5.39.217.76tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% v) b' ^: L* h7 e4 M: p6 c
i have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.5.39.217.762 Z' `) q* z  |  Z! c$ l/ a+ i2 P
1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.
1 Q* F! f& }! B6 N$ `# S& g" J公仔箱論壇2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing.