返回列表 回復 發帖
「暫時失明」這點很有保留. 不少軍警引入新型「非致命武器」都聲稱沒有永久傷害, 但後果總會發現有後遺症. 這次只不過是借機引入新的強力武器方便執法. 對民權往往弊多於利.
1

評分次數

  • aa00

well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.公仔箱論壇6 V+ r$ k5 }, B0 s5 ?
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb9 J/ Q# @7 q& Z9 D
i have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.5.39.217.762 _& e6 a: v0 T& L
1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.3 p* d8 Y4 E+ ]2 _  U
2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing.
1

評分次數

  • aa00

返回列表