Board logo

標題: NC才打小球 [打印本頁]

作者: sylk    時間: 2009-3-6 05:17 PM     標題: NC才打小球

首先,这篇文章的标题,呃哼,是从Rob Mahoney写的一篇文章中的关键词“偷来的”,那篇文章是在一个很出色,很幽默,很有益的,偶尔还会使人发怒的Hardwood Paroxysm和The Two Man Game(篮球论坛)中出现的。我婶婶的被这组词吸引了,与此同时,我便想到了一些NBA球队想要追求的打球风格。

你们来猜猜接下来我要把哪种球风从淤泥地里捞出来谈?

是滴。就是小球战术,即所谓跑轰战术,小但快,看起来我好像是在说废话。囧。基本上那些崇尚进攻的球队都会配备一些有跑动能力的球员。当然这些球员都要会有一定的远距离投篮攻击能力,也因为如此,他们的身材也应当会比对位的对方球员小,而且球队也宁可少一些步伐缓慢的大个子球员。。。然后再加上一个速度快的控球后卫。

这个战术有什么问题?这些球队不重视防守就像Jessica Simpson不重视营养课程一样,无论是他们的首发球员还是他们的替补球员。

然后你猜猜怎么着了?他们通常不会大胜。或者有时候会输的很惨。

理所当然的,球员们喜欢在场上跑来跑去,扣来扣去,尽可能的向前冲,然后制造出更多的跑动和扣篮机会。直到他们真的是十分十分累了,或者是十分十分老了,又或者他们是即累又老了。

那些喜欢这样打球的球队。。。嗯~~~~~~像是菲尼克斯,金州,费城(他们只是相比较其他一些球队而言,况且他们的三分球实力真的没比我好到哪里去),甚至低调的灰熊队都是崇尚进攻的。。。等等?这些球队是不是都不是总冠军争夺者?

那谁是真正的强队呢?我真的很难启齿,但是他们就是洛杉矶湖人队。看看他们在球队保持健康时的首发:Fisher,Kobe,Odom/滑雪男,Pau,Bynum。咕~~,有三个人超过七尺。他们还有很多十分有天赋的球员,但他们从来没有过要 “跑轰”之类的愚蠢想法。

休斯顿:Brooks,Battier,Artest,Scola,Yao。有一大堆人站在Brooks面前都要比他高。他们虽然打的很无聊但毕竟很有效率。

Boston。。。Rondo,Allen,PP,KG,Perkisachump.com。。。他们的4号位和5号位都可以称得上是“偏大型”。有时候你也许会对他们的比赛感到十分兴奋。。但我告诉你,这只是媒体在炒作罢了(他们打的其实也很无聊)。。。由于他们真的是一支很好很好的球队,所以你会很兴奋的去看他们的比赛。

当然,菲尼克斯将Amare和Shaq一起摆到首发。。。但他们很绅士的不去利用他们的身体优势,除非他们从中场就开始跳起来扣篮。
这就是在一个和身体素质十分有关系的联盟里很难定义的事情。当那些小个子球员在家庭聚会时,被那些他们高大的表兄的手遮住头时,他们便投不了篮了。

现在让我们把这个战术说的暂时有点具体些吧。

灰熊V.S.雷霆,星期六,2/28

很好的一个例子。

这场比赛几乎就是场混战。Westbrook是个速度快而且极具天赋的球员,但他只是个菜鸟。随着两队都打出小球的风格,他们的速率和投篮准度简直就是糟糕透顶(因为两队都是差队,所以他们的比分没有打到135-123之类的)。这两队都没有十分适合这个体系的球员(指身材方面),但两个阵营都传出了“我们必须跑轰起来”的号角。。。而且这两支球队没有一支说是震惊了整个联盟。这场比赛就像是两个伪巨人的冲撞,都被暗器所伤。。。打的太快了。

总结一下,这样的战术风格看起来是要把形式摆在功用前面,然后用它来尝试克服因力量不足和年轻而带来的一些基本的缺点。

在我的脑子里(NBA看起来也是这样的),把形式摆在功用前面,那就等于自杀。

我很期待有关于这样一个话题的其他篇文章的出现,下一次,我会讨论下爬行类动物。

我是说真的哦。
作者: sylk    時間: 2009-3-6 05:19 PM     標題: Smallball Is For Suckers

Smallball Is For Suckers   
Written by Matthew Noe     
Sunday, 01 March 2009 16:00  
First off-the title to this post was, ahem, "procured" from the keyword listing on a post by Rob Mahoney at the well-written, entertaining, and, God help us all, occasionally thought-provoking Hardwood Paroxysm and The Two Man Game. The phrase stuck with me and definitely synced with some things I'd been pondering regarding the way some NBA teams seem to want to play.

Guess what style of play I'm about to drag through the proverbial mud?

That's right. Smallball, run-n-gun, small but quick, blahblahfreakinblah. Teams who "shoot" (pun intended) for this identity take steps to make sure that their rosters are structured to "run" that way. This includes focusing on long-range shooters, undersized everybodys, and preferably no Lurchlike slowfooted tall guys...with a faster-than-lubricated-lightning PG.

The problem? These teams avoid defense like Jessica Simpson avoids the salad course, whether it's the starters or a "specialty bench unit" of some sort.

And guess what? That means they don't win big. Or maybe even much.

Sure, players love to run and dunk and run and pass back and forth and run some more and dunk some more. Until they get really, really tired  or really old or both.

The teams that like to play this way...hmmm..PHX, GSW, PHI (to a degree, even though their collective three-point ability really isn't any better than mine),even the lowly Grizzlies purport to play such a style...wait? Those teams aren't contenders?

Who are really good teams? Pains me to say it, but LAL. Oh, look who they start (pre-injury): Fisher, Kobe, Odom/Snowboard King, Pau, Bynum. Hmm..three guys who either are or are scaring seven feet. They have super talented players and do not talk about "running identity" or any such foolishness.

Houston (tip o' cap to Dr. Zack): Brooks, Battier, Crazy Pills, Scola, Yao. Plenty of height there once you get past Brooks. Boring but effective.

Boston...Rondo, Allen, PP, KG, Perkisachump.com...4 and 5 could almost be considered "oversize". Exciting to watch sometimes maybe..but really only 'cuz the media tells you they are...but they're exciting 'cuz they're really, really good.

Sure, PHX started Amare and the Methuselah Saguaro...but they philosophically avoid taking advantage of that size unless they get jammed up in the halfcourt.

It's just not possible to state this in an appropriate fashion-but size matters in the NBA. The small teams are gonna get their tall cousin's hand put on their head so they can't shoot at the family gathering (AKA playoffs).

Now let's make this a bit more (phrase of the day upcoming) temporally relevant.

Grizzlies v. OKC, Saturday 2/28.

Prime example.

This game was sort of (and that's being kind) a mess. Westbrook is fast and extremely talented, but is a rookie and a bit of a bull in a china shop. With both of these teams going small for fair stretches, the pace and precision of this game was helter-skelter (but since both teams sorta suck, the score did not wind up like 135-123). With both of these teams lacking talented size, 'we have to get out and run' is something one hears from both these teams' camps...and neither of these teams is exactly burning up the league. This game was like a Clash of the Suckitudinal Titans, with both teams being seduced by the Dark Side...playing too fast, that is.

Distilled, the idea is that SSOL and its stylistic siblings seem to place form over function, and attempt to overcome basic flaws by accentuating minor, unsustainable strengths.

And in my world (and, it seems, the NBA world), placing form over function=mortal sin.

Look for another post soon on this subject-next time, I'm going to discuss reptiles.

Seriously.




歡迎光臨 公仔箱論壇 (http://5.39.217.76/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0