公仔箱論壇 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 不知所謂 [打印本頁]

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-15 02:18 PM 標題: 不知所謂

[youtube]bgbotH_T_L8[/youtube]

[youtube]3br0lwmUkcU[/youtube]

作者: Hikouseki 時間: 2008-10-15 03:58 PM

sigh...if they really want to help hong kong...this is not how to do it
黃毓民 claim that he's a Christian as well....tho we need to stand and speak for peoples...this is just not the right way to express it...Christians are not rebels tho we do not follow the mainstream current...

作者: elsecheng 時間: 2008-10-15 04:52 PM

都唔知黃毓文究竟在做什麼?? 聽完先嘈啦!!!! 佢以為咁做香港人會覺得他是在幫我們嗎???? 影衰我們香港人, 外面的人以為香港人冇文化, 好似台灣人開會咁打架.

作者: littlefirzen 時間: 2008-10-15 05:19 PM

今年肯定仲有大把呢d野發生

特首d髮線都愈退愈後 -.-

作者: heiter89 時間: 2008-10-15 07:05 PM

我以前日日聽(イ巨)個節目.聽聽下就覺得唔係路..日日就話邊個邊個針對(イ巨)..同(イ巨)理念唔同就錯...同(イ巨)對頭選所以追刹人地.人地講返(イ巨)就係錦媽人地.好彩(イ巨)信個教會好.如果信着甚麼聖戰...真係唔知會點...

作者: baby3001 時間: 2008-10-15 07:24 PM

铁3角，肯定还有个主谋

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-15 11:17 PM

唔明點解要揀"蕉" =.=

作者: lukyiwai 時間: 2008-10-15 11:27 PM

well i dont think it is anything worng, not only taiwan ppl do that, it comes to worldwide. on the other hand, half of them are not elect by us. the most important thing is our leader really need to eat shit. does he say anything in this downtime in hk, try to see other leader how to do their job!! so i dont think it is 不知所謂

作者: livon0319 時間: 2008-10-16 12:53 AM

有咩問題?
捐百幾億去四川即刻過
一千蚊生果金要入息審查?

作者: xe01 時間: 2008-10-16 01:17 AM

毓民行為上的確有點過火，
但特首更不知所謂，
就是因為愛國，身為中國人、香港人，
共產黨的言行更令人心痛、慚愧。唉...........

[ 本帖最後由 xe01 於 2008-10-16 01:28 AM 編輯 ]

作者: fanny5656 時間: 2008-10-16 01:22 AM

其實我都好唔滿意政府...
個一千元生果金都要多多藉口...

[ 本帖最後由 fanny5656 於 2008-10-16 01:25 AM 編輯 ]

作者: tango_one 時間: 2008-10-16 02:38 AM

If you disagree with other people, you are always welcome to express your opinions. In Hong Kong, everyone had rights of speech, but it takes turns to express yourself. This is also called "Manner of speech". This is a basic respect for everyone around you even your emeny. In this incident, Mr. Wong broken the order of the legislation council first. He is the one who disturb the normal running cycle of HK government. He should be held in responsible. As a citiizen, we should support the leader whose job is to maintain and improve our quanlity of life. We don't need those three mad man who act like a gangster inside the council. SHAME ON THEM !!!!
People had complaints about the existing HK government and their policies. They feel helpless and wish someone can help them. I agee we need some changes. By doing these kind of actions show the international, people in Hong Kong is uncivilized (Mr. Wong even call him as a professor). If we reliance and support these kind of outrageous individual in our governemnt, I cannot see these will create any constuctive help in Hong Kong, but our children will learn these as their way to ask for stuff.
Thank you for your time.

作者: uRchInCHIU 時間: 2008-10-16 08:30 AM

在目前經濟環境下設立最低工資只會大量增加失業

作者: heiter89 時間: 2008-10-16 08:40 AM

原帖由 livon0319 於 2008-10-16 12:53 AM 發表
有咩問題?
捐百幾億去四川即刻過
一千蚊生果金要入息審查?

You are right.... 請人就十幾廿萬個月就面不改容...加二百三百比D老人家就死ロ死面又lee又lo...加到千ニ都唔多...好話唔好聽老人家重可以囉多幾多年...果班助理無也做又無也錯十幾廿萬人工重有ニ三十年比...

btw...出蕉又太過份.

[ 本帖最後由 heiter89 於 2008-10-16 08:44 AM 編輯 ]

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-16 11:18 AM

我無話特首arm
我無agree佢唔加生果金
但您地真係覺得呀wong生椗蕉對件事有幫助咩?
我同意tango_one所講 : everyone had rights of speech, but it takes turns to express yourself. This is also called "Manner of speech".

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-16 11:19 AM

原帖由 xe01 於 2008-10-16 01:17 AM 發表
毓民行為上的確有點過火，
但特首更不知所謂，
就是因為愛國，身為中國人、香港人，
共產黨的言行更令人心痛、慚愧。唉...........

我見到佢係咁啤住長毛添 =.=

作者: livon0319 時間: 2008-10-16 11:21 AM

佢地講左會激ga la
旗幟鮮明ge 反對派ma

我覺得佢地係測試緊條底線係乜nor
不過曾主席好似仲鵪春過范徐麗泰
佢個樣好無奈

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-16 11:21 AM

原帖由 lukyiwai 於 2008-10-15 11:27 PM 發表
well i dont think it is anything worng, not only taiwan ppl do that, it comes to worldwide. on the other hand, half of them are not elect by us. the most important thing is our leader really need to e ...

wong生咁做幫唔到件事
我淨係聽到佢o係到bilibala....
好嘈好嘈....

作者: hikki100 時間: 2008-10-16 12:07 PM

沒有抗爭哪有改變..

作者: ilike2 時間: 2008-10-16 12:09 PM

make some noise
先多人關注

政府好興將D新政策
係唔係人人知情或明白的情況下
低調通過

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-16 12:25 PM

原帖由 livon0319 於 2008-10-16 11:21 AM 發表
佢地講左會激ga la
旗幟鮮明ge 反對派ma

我覺得佢地係測試緊條底線係乜nor
不過曾主席好似仲鵪春過范徐麗泰
佢個樣好無奈

係...
好似跳線咁係咁repeat
但又無人理佢 =.=

作者: xe01 時間: 2008-10-16 04:45 PM

我覺得毓民，長毛做法都有用，
雖然飛蕉有點爭議，不是雞蛋可能已經比面，嘻﹗
至少政府不敢再當我地小市民無到，
官商勾結難道是無理指控嗎？
他們關係千絲萬縷，我們只是足到一點點他們最過份蛛絲馬跡，
但也無疾而終，完全當我們無到。
香港真的50年不變，完全無寸進。

作者: ilike2 時間: 2008-10-16 08:15 PM

原帖由 xe01 於 2008-10-16 04:45 PM 發表
我覺得毓民，長毛做法都有用，
雖然飛蕉有點爭議，不是雞蛋可能已經比面，嘻﹗
至少政府不敢再當我地小市民無到，
官商勾結難道是無理指控嗎？
他們關係千絲萬縷，我們只是足到一點點他們最過份蛛絲馬跡，
但也無疾而終，完全當我們無到 ...

說得對
人地台灣三聚青胺問題
個食物部既官員要落台
因為佢地要同一人一票既市民交代

反觀我地的香港
如果唔係有新聞自由的話
佢地基本上做到幾難睇幾出面都無人理到
到時就...

作者: ka0316 時間: 2008-10-17 01:46 AM

原帖由 elsecheng 於 2008-10-15 04:52 PM 發表
都唔知黃毓文究竟在做什麼?? 聽完先嘈啦!!!! 佢以為咁做香港人會覺得他是在幫我們嗎???? 影衰我們香港人, 外面的人以為香港人冇文化, 好似台灣人開會咁打架. ...

u are on 9

with out them help hk people to fight for, we will pk la

use ur brain la
pig west

作者: 青鳥飛翔 時間: 2008-10-17 02:01 AM

簡蕉我估係因為生果金掛=.=

社民3子= ="選民放得佢地入去....佢地跟本就係做呢d野架啦...
之前長毛都未夠~而家仲黎多個毓民~
雖然我唔認同佢做法....
但特首對佢地咁強烈既反對都係冇表示-.-
睇到d 回post講得幾岩....
1000蚊要入息審查...
億億聲捐上去內地就咁快手....
仲要唔知幾多比人貪左...唉....
睇黎中國都係想同化香港人--

作者: peess 時間: 2008-10-17 07:19 AM

While we are sane enough to criticize this embarrassing and unacceptable behaviour, I just could not understand how come the like of him and 'long hair' were elected in the first place....... hindsight is always a beauty. I just hope in the next election, the elected would reflect the intelligence of the general public. Rather than non-constructive criticism, the Legco is in need of somebody who makes sensible proposal. Anyway, it is ashame that the banana missed the 'target', otherwise they could be liable for common assault....... Maybe thats the fastest mean to throw Mr Wong out of the Legco.

作者: wywabde 時間: 2008-10-17 08:44 AM

once wong is elected, today's situation has been predicted. It just reflected the quality of today's hong kong ppl, esp those eligible to elect. They did not take enough consideration on the outcome about who they elected (well... maybe they are not well-educated on that) so that they may only elect one by that a candidate's speech looks like sound and is what they need. However, they have not taken consideration on whether the candidate's attitude is helpful when participating in the government.

Besides, on the issue of the elder allowance, it may be a bit hash to the elderly for having the examination on their income but it still needs a serious consideration. Some said the donation to China can be in thousand millions and was done quickly but the elder allowance is treated like that. However, I think it is very logical. The disaster in China was really serious and the donation was needed in emergency. At that moment, most of the hong kong ppl also donated to the sufferers no matter what their financial situation is. If the government had not donated, it was still blamed on its hardness and blind on the disaster. Also, the donation is a lump sum payment that only reduced the immediate cash in the government but that is not a long term expense. Nonetheless, the elder allowance is a long term expense for the government and the aging problem will bring the amount of such expense up. In today's global financial difficulties, the increase in government expenditure which cannot provide the improvement on the unemployment rate has a possibility to increase the bearing of the middle income group.

ps this is just my feeling and opinion after hearing about such issue and reading the above posts and there is no meaning on any offense. Also, i'm not sure those terms so pls dont

if any wrong

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-17 11:29 AM

原帖由 peess 於 2008-10-17 07:19 AM 發表
While we are sane enough to criticize this embarrassing and unacceptable behaviour, I just could not understand how come the like of him and 'long hair' were elected in the first place....... hindsigh ...

佢應該係特登miss target ga~~

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-17 11:32 AM

原帖由 青鳥飛翔 於 2008-10-17 02:01 AM 發表
簡蕉我估係因為生果金掛=.=

社民3子= ="選民放得佢地入去....佢地跟本就係做呢d野架啦...
之前長毛都未夠~而家仲黎多個毓民~
雖然我唔認同佢做法....
但特首對佢地咁強烈既反對都係冇表示-.-
睇到d 回post講得幾岩. ...

所以果陣我捐$都要揀d基構係扣最少行政費用
如果唔係度度扣下,
真係好少去到災民手...

(其實....大6自己放少次煙花都自救到)

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-17 11:37 AM

原帖由 wywabde 於 2008-10-17 08:44 AM 發表
once wong is elected, today's situation has been predicted. It just reflected the quality of today's hong kong ppl, esp those eligible to elect. They did not take enough consideration on the outcome a ...

其實大家都係討論下
無話arm同錯o既
您地肯覆我個post我都唔知幾開心 ^^

作者: xe01 時間: 2008-10-17 07:20 PM

原帖由 peess 於 2008-10-17 07:19 AM 發表
While we are sane enough to criticize this embarrassing and unacceptable behaviour, I just could not understand how come the like of him and 'long hair' were elected in the first place....... hindsigh ...

真可笑，清醒的人都知道，成個立法會根本比建制派控制，
仲要分組點票，嘿嘿﹗荒天下之大謬。
被譴責的「垃圾會」議員仍可自動當選，不用一票，簡直可笑、可恥。
不是的話，香港可能已有一人一票的有真民主。
難道毓民、長毛、甚至泛民真的無建設性的建議嗎？嘿嘿，做做功課吧，老兄。
睇睇天主教監察會可知誰是人，誰是鬼。
嘿嘿﹗我也hope in the next election, the elected would reflect the intelligence of the general public.
公義有大小之分，當我們禮貌地說出我們合理的訴求不得接受，
就要用别的手段去爭取，界線可能是不可流血或更高，没人知道。
歷史對馬丁路得金，孫中山亦得到正面評價，
這也是「hindsight is always a beauty」，
當然不能把他們完全比較，
對六四事件，嘿嘿﹗
唉﹗身為中國人自己也有一陣慚愧。
没有抗爭，那有改變﹗

[ 本帖最後由 xe01 於 2008-10-17 07:22 PM 編輯 ]

作者: gobe 時間: 2008-10-18 11:54 PM

原帖由 nitz 於 2008-10-15 11:17 PM 發表
唔明點解要揀"蕉" =.=

哈哈食蕉啊嘛
不過比詹賠忠句“膠待”搶曬我覺得

[ 本帖最後由 gobe 於 2008-10-18 11:57 PM 編輯 ]

作者: tempersitu 時間: 2008-10-20 01:33 PM

先唔好理特首啱唔啱,出"蕉"又真係太过分嘅,好似泼妇骂街咁.都唔知点解有人选呢两个傻佬入局嘅.

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-22 01:08 PM

原帖由 gobe 於 2008-10-18 11:54 PM 發表

哈哈食蕉啊嘛
不過比詹賠忠句“膠待”搶曬我覺得

haha係呀
我覺得勁爆笑!!!
呀jan仲要係咁repeat haha

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-10-22 01:10 PM

今朝聽晴朗
聽到有個伯伯total拎左8k幾生果金
e+佢全數拎返出黎俾政府
大家可以聽下佢講o既野
我覺得佢好有骨氣
勁撐佢!!!

作者: maf0756 時間: 2008-10-26 01:40 AM

黄毓文仲话想做中大校长, 好彩佢做唔到~

俾佢做到, 真係教坏下一代!

真係成只癫狗咁!

作者: tvbking 時間: 2008-10-27 11:45 AM

原帖由 heiter89 於 2008-10-16 08:40 AM 發表

You are right.... 請人就十幾廿萬個月就面不改容...加二百三百比D老人家就死ロ死面又lee又lo...加到千ニ都唔多...好話唔好聽老人家重可以囉多幾多年...果班助理無也做又無也錯十幾廿萬人工重有ニ三十年比...

btw ...

you are right 2 香港政府係咪要全港既老人家上街游行示威先至改, 唉,
百億掉出街面不改容十幾廿萬請一個人又面不改容
加二百三百就翻面, 鞋,
毓民今次又係唔掂嘈左幾分鐘又掟蕉雖然係講出佢自己既心声, 但係用左一種無禮貌n過激既方法、次次都係咁唔係辨法

[ 本帖最後由 tvbking 於 2008-10-27 11:51 AM 編輯 ]

作者: heiter89 時間: 2008-10-30 06:12 PM

我驚就係好似台灣.系議會打生打死.出位之後.重做左總統.然後就大貪特貪.重大大聲話比人迫害!

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-11-4 11:16 AM

e+ d人咪有樣學樣
咩都拎條蕉出黎lor =.=

作者: nitz 時間: 2008-11-4 11:17 AM

原帖由 maf0756 於 2008-10-26 01:40 AM 發表
黄毓文仲话想做中大校长, 好彩佢做唔到~

俾佢做到, 真係教坏下一代!

真係成只癫狗咁!

老老實實
佢把聲"拆"到咁
真係聽唔到佢講咩

作者: kokwei 時間: 2008-11-6 11:26 AM

开会好闷ga, 娱乐下大家！

作者: Heit 時間: 2008-11-21 04:32 PM

原帖由 livon0319 於 2008-10-16 12:53 AM 發表
有咩問題?
捐百幾億去四川即刻過
一千蚊生果金要入息審查?

你傻架果度系救人
E度審查一下唔會死人
用下個腦諗野OK？

歡迎光臨公仔箱論壇 (http://5.39.217.76/)