標題: [時事討論] Police-Citizen Relationship: Where do we go from here? [打印本頁] 作者: felicity2010 時間: 2015-5-11 11:48 AM 標題: Police-Citizen Relationship: Where do we go from here?
Police-Citizen Relationship: Wheredo we go from here? % m& O4 v$ H/ c) C% f) M/ C" r公仔箱論壇Randy Shek @ 法政匯思 $ P8 E* E6 h1 G3 w6 ?$ J3 x公仔箱論壇公仔箱論壇0 [0 ]. D; Y$ W4 o
3 N! @* [- _; K1 X( T% i+ t' R5.39.217.76Much has been written and said about the now ex-Police Commissioner Andy Tsang (曾偉雄). His sound bites were often fodder for the press. He dismissed a call for apology as “something of a fantasy” （天方夜談）after an 8-year old boy was hit in the eye by police pepper spray. He described his officers as “doting mothers” (慈母) when they were widely criticized for their heavy-handed, even violent, approach towards protesters in the Umbrella Movement. y: v9 x2 B6 A7 m
8 k+ C# S# ?- }5 f
Many of his sound bites generated enthusiastic satire. The most recent one was when he was asked on the eve of his retirement about the tense relationship between many Hong Kongers and the police under his leadership. Tsang responded: “if you asked kidnappers about police-citizen relationship, of course they would say that the relationship is bad”. 5 Y" `5 H7 w9 G# h$ M: C
It is fair to say that trust between the police and Hong Kongers is at an all-time low and the image of the police in the minds of many Hong Kongers has been tarnished beyond recognition. 8 q, a$ N+ Z3 ~: }7 H! s1 d' atvb now,tvbnow,bttvb ' Z1 a1 C! v5 ]3 ]) E2 z* t% q, d! IWhat has Tsang’s legacy achieved? Is there more respect for the police force as a result of his hardline approach? Are Tsang’s utterances and police action really gaining the public’s trust that the police could enforce the law impartially? Or have these utterances provoked many into distrusting the police when such provocation could have been easily avoided, often by a few better-chosen words or simply keeping one’s mouth shut? * z7 p5 P6 m2 e' q l* G; Y公仔箱論壇 + h9 Q1 x2 z" T4 itvb now,tvbnow,bttvb ! s) c" h Z7 K3 V: Q: ^It always takes two to tango. One cannot simply say that the police bear no responsibilities for the deterioration of the relationship between them and Hong Kongers. Most Hong Kongers of my generation (those born after the ICAC was created) were brought up respecting the police and believing that the police represented dependability and righteousness. Many boys aspired to be policemen. For the police’s image to deteriorate to this extent, it could not simply have been the work of a few angry protesters or sarcastic internet artworks depicting the police as fascist brutes. There must be a reason.公仔箱論壇$ C+ W* ]2 x# x% M: n. N
( S" n9 J( \ S8 z) e h
For the 3 years after Tsang took office in January 2011, the United States Department of State pointed out in its annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices that one of the most important problems in Hong Kong was “an increase in arbitrary arrest or detention and other aggressive police tactics hampering the freedom of assembly.” The 2011 report referred to the International Federation of Journalists’ observation that 2011 saw “a rapid erosion in basic civil liberties and that the government and in particular the police were becoming more aggressive against protesters”. These Country Reports are often cited in Court in asylum cases – where life and limbs are at stake – as authoritative reports of the state of human rights in different countries. There must be some truth in their assessment of human rights in Hong Kong. . S& [. D7 d8 L; d) T5.39.217.76TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。% o5 a# t5 o0 a
During the Umbrella Movement, instances of inappropriate police action abounded. There was the deployment of 87 canisters of tear gas on peaceful protesters, which the Hong Kong Bar Association described as an “excessive and disproportionate use of force”. Then there was the police superintendent caught on camera using a baton to whack the back of a protester running past. And how about the scene where police officers were standing on the sideline as suspected triad members chased off protestors in Mongkok? Or the harrowing footage of Ken Tsang (曾健超) being beaten in a dark corner by 7 police officers? 3 Y/ X9 g% {* r x, c/ s. Z$ c! X3 P' \- z1 o1 k* f2 v
In a period of instability and tension, such as the one we now find ourselves in after the end of the Umbrella Movement, leaders of the police force must take steps to repair this torn relationship by a genuine display of impartiality and accountability. The public needs to trust that anyone who breaks the law, whether protester or police officer, will be treated equally and brought to justice. tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb$ F0 c" N+ p% v' H
5.39.217.76" H9 _- |7 R8 u1 W- ^, S
5.39.217.76/ z4 k! u. ^% ^$ l O2 T
Clearly, the public is owed an explanation about the alleged assault on Ken Tsang by 7 police officers. We need to know that they will be properly investigated for these allegations. It is a question of trust. We need to know that if this happened to any one of us, we could depend on the police to pursue the culprit with the same determination as they would in any serious crime. We all rely on the police to gather the essential evidence so that justice is given a chance to be done. ; B3 b1 \$ V4 J% a+ F6 J) G 3 L& J8 p% @& B1 v: Gtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbThe appropriateness of using 87 canisters of tear gas on largely peaceful protesters will continue to be hotly disputed. While the public knew that the police had a tough job to do in this massive public order situation, the Hong Kong Bar Association’s characterisation of this as an “excessive and disproportionate use of force” is a fair one. If the police believe, in hindsight, that they could have done better in handling the situation, then simply admitting it might help them regain some measure of respect from the public.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb9 R, F! W9 q$ i4 R2 X
5.39.217.76* v% W# o T4 v7 u0 P
Much of policing is about offering positive protection of human rights. For instance, the right to life is protected by the laws creating offences of murder and unlawful killing. It is up to the police to prevent and detect such crimes. On a wider level, police protection of the right to life manifests itself in their providing social services such as responding to calls of domestic violence and emergency services where life and limb are in jeopardy. 9 \. Y l8 ?, D& f) ~tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb ! P1 e# b( f7 X- h2 jTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。公仔箱論壇, L. m1 v/ i* k) a( X% `
Another example is the prevention and detection of theft offences, which directly contribute to the protection of the right to own property and the prohibition against arbitrary deprivation of property. The police’s duty to protect other human rights such as the freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and demonstration is no less than their duty to protect the right to life or the right to own private property.4 j2 U: k; ^6 n$ L7 w' v% g$ ]
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb$ H8 n. Q% Q( K+ J# \ P+ ~5 H5 U
Despite claims of political neutrality by the police, Hong Kongers need to see that the police can be trusted to discharge their mission without any hint of sympathy or hostility towards a suspect’s political affiliation. Be he yellow ribbon or blue ribbon, pro- or anti- establishment, if the law is broken, the police force will bring him to justice. If police officers broke the law, the police force will bring them to justice just the same. Being accountable will earn back the respect many Hong Kongers so desperately need to have for the police force. One can only hope that the new Police Commissioner will ease this tension in police-citizen relationship by showing that the police are indeed impartial and accountable. We Hong Kongers want to trust and respect our police force.作者: felicity2010 時間: 2015-5-11 10:27 PM
徐少驊: 給香港警隊的公開信公仔箱論壇3 ?- m, F7 M7 w. A c
5 _ }0 v/ k3 C$ @6 yTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb7 |1 |+ o4 K! h/ `0 y
智障男被屈殺人犯，警方說程序無錯，故無須道歉及無人要負責。保安局局長黎棟國輕描淡寫的說：「警方一向抱着尋找真相的精神，對所有案件都本着專業精神，適當地處理。」完全沒有道歉的意向，這樣的態度簡直是對受害人及其家屬再一次的傷害！5.39.217.76# S3 G, i- H' H
5.39.217.76* v& n8 w$ I8 P; z. U0 V
我們的警隊發生什麼事了？！ . m3 L o9 `$ E/ J" C G y: I6 [; P4 P 0 C' J0 S S4 j% E" U是的，凡事總有出錯的可能，錯了，立即認了及道歉，這是常識吧！ * m: R8 x; |: k! ~9 i) a# F公仔箱論壇 . h6 L* }& p0 m7 L2 a# p7 U拉錯了人，向受害人及其家屬道歉是應有之義，立即作內部檢討才是負責任的態度。何況警方拘捕疑人時，疑人的親人已經表示疑人智障，警方仍然按一般的審問程序處理，這難道真的沒有檢視的空間。 . h* ~: h, v1 FTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 4 _+ J: P$ e1 U1 w% u9 `! Z) gTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。昔日警務處處長鄧竟成因為經常代表警隊為失誤道歉，因而被戲謔為Sorry Sir，但再來看看今天死不認錯的情況，在對比之下，鄧竟成的英明（其實是理所當然）就立即顯示出來了。曾經有說，鄧的軟弱風格令市民看不起警察，真的如此嗎？你看看由曾偉雄的強悍作風為警察在香港市民的心目中留下了怎樣的形象？！3 \* l' [5 }- e X
公仔箱論壇9 u8 R7 ^3 S7 Z X$ U9 T
在智障男被屈殺人犯一事不久，網絡上出現了這樣的一幅相片：一塊生豬肉蓋上警徽。我看了之後不禁慨嘆，怎麼香港警隊的形象會時光倒流至上世紀七十年代之前呢？！$ a: y& q$ w1 {! i1 `8 H5 |
. F0 L0 b. }$ F公仔箱論壇立法會議員張超雄及一群關心事件的市民、殘疾團體昨在網上發起聯署，去信保安局局長黎棟國及新上任的警務處處長盧偉聰，要求警方就高調拘捕智障男子等錯誤，向受害人及家屬道歉，蘋果日報報道，昨日約有1,700人聯署。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb9 B9 l; o& M/ D; P N
. y& X: R- e8 R' l$ @TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。聯署批評，警方高調拘捕受害人，更發佈不實信息，指受害人有自閉、行為偏差、憎恨狗隻，這些是對受害人及其他自閉人士的誣捏，嚴重損害受害人的聲譽及影響公眾對自閉症人士的觀感。 - \7 s+ t" p/ S N3 x mTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。% C0 X5 {. Y1 o% @
聯署又批評，事主在錄口供未有家人陪同，警方以引導式及封閉式提問，藉以「創作」警察認為有利的口供以控告受害人；他們批評，警察涉嫌執法不公，已經不單是政治取態問題，更是有種不理是非，只顧警察面子而失去專業判斷，令人質疑警察的專業操守，只向弱者抽刃。2 N: t8 _' W* C D
