本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2015-2-6 08:38 AM 編輯 3 q4 c6 C) j, {4 y- u' u& sTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 % j+ T2 d$ O" c: O# l港大法學院長何耀明公開信全文5.39.217.769 Q3 u# s P9 Q1 i1 N- f TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。9 n. @+ _' }0 S. o1 p
( _8 l% ?( \5 R2 A" w& v: RThe Faculty of Law’s Response tothe RAE 2014 Report! J- h: e \* C, ^' i* n
, h! T6 R8 ]/ W! {% r5 l8 w. MThere has been media interest in the last few days concerning the University Grants Committee (UGC)’s results of the Research Assessment Exercise 2014(RAE), particularly with the comparison between the law faculties of The University of Hong Kong and The Chinese University of Hong Kong. ; V+ F, W. X3 N3 A/ r+ G+ z " M; H& ^8 T3 ^5 ?# W5.39.217.76We begin by thanking the Law Panel of the RAE for completing a demanding and important task in such a professional manner, and we congratulate the Faculty of Law of The Chinese University of Hong Kong for its excellent achievement in the Exercise. It is a very good situation that all the law schools in Hong Kong SAR are collectively making a significant impact in Hong Kong, in the region and internationally. $ L2 [$ f5 U4 E" q, g公仔箱論壇What we wish to point out is well described on the UGC website and the Reading Guides of the RAE report:, |1 H2 C( ?# M' b, P
公仔箱論壇 t- `! K9 M) w# A% x
“On the interpretation of the RAE results of each institution, [it has been] emphasised that due regard should be given to the institutions’ different roles, missions, discipline focus and history.” (http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/press/2015/pr27012015.htm) ' g N% V0 m( H: [6 }: ` Z5.39.217.76 1 n% W& \: }9 v+ x2 d& e公仔箱論壇“The results are not for comparison purposes and not to be used in a standalone manner… [I]t is neither fair nor appropriate to compare the quality profiles of different institutions.” (Reading Guides1 and 5) - Y& m* I+ \% b$ J
$ v1 f7 `8 n) X4 _* V
The Faculty of Law of The University of Hong Kong is the oldest and the largest of the three law schools in Hong Kong.Historically, it has seen its mission to be both a law faculty that responds to the needs of the legal system and legal profession in Hong Kong and as part of the international community of legal scholars. It has sought to produce high quality research and publications in a way which has a high impact in both Hong Kong and global legal discourse. As an institution the HKU Law Faculty divides its time and resources between them. The RAE report on us in fact reflects this dual mission.公仔箱論壇5 c3 S6 U3 Z! {/ j
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。% \, s1 R1 C7 ]6 t2 R4 r! z
The Faculty wishes to dispel the suggestion or implication made in some quarters that it is not doing well in terms of research. The Faculty was, and is, aware that serving its mission to contribute to the Hong Kong community in general and the legal profession in particular might mean that it will sometimes be at the expense of doing more work with a global focus, but that is a trade-off the Faculty is proud to make. ; [/ j( z0 e' _/ O! V$ z5.39.217.760 E$ b6 M+ L1 K* L
The Faculty does not, by any means, intend to convey the impression that it thinks that there is no room for improvement. It is the Faculty’s aim to be regarded amongst the top law schools in the world.The Faculty has been engaging in a wide-ranging exercise of institutional self-reflection and strategic planning. Many of the RAE panel’s suggestions on international collaboration and globally-focused research form a major part of our current research strategy. We shall, over the next few weeks, be discussing the RAE report very carefully to reflect on how we can do even better. Indeed, we are most grateful for the positive and critical feedback which the exercise has provided. , v( z; T! p! A( d ; s" s; s1 c) P3 n! `0 f) i& Otvb now,tvbnow,bttvbWith the feedback gained from RAE and the continued support of the community, the Faculty looks forward to becoming even stronger in the coming years.; `/ F1 P; P4 e
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb: D$ X- H2 ]" c1 K2 d T3 i. e
Michael Hortvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% t+ d4 Q: Y2 c9 K7 W8 l0 q
Dean 3 J# ]4 C5 d" n3 s公仔箱論壇Faculty of Law 8 T: j7 o, r5 m- `3 mThe University of Hong Kong 4 O: o: Y* v* f. R' S% H, `# _tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb' y. Z* _6 K3 y4 U& E s ^2 G# \ 作者: felicity2010 時間: 2015-2-6 08:44 AM
港大法律學院院長反擊指控 翌日即遭爆合約「異常優厚」 5.39.217.76( k) Q( c( g& |5 K* G) K+ I
! r* W9 n; I* }4 S1 I- z, \6 N/ M
[attach]3035704[/attach]tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb/ p; P7 y( y# D5 z' j* {4 e Y
4 a: |3 u6 l) S! S e' k$ s7 l公仔箱論壇「有心人」對港大法律學院的攻擊繼續升級。隨該院新任院長何耀明，發公開信回應教資會報告披露該院研究項目去年水平，強調該院除研究外，更重視對貢獻香港社會的使命的消息昨日曝光後，《星島日報》今日就報道，收到匿名信指控，何耀明所獲合約異常優厚，質疑是否涉及前院長陳文敏。+ M# [. k# V* K+ Q. `
$ i& y" P4 A7 e! H& ~8 c: T3 Gtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb《星島》引述該匿名函件，院長一般的聘用年期是5年，但何耀明的合約，一份是從2014年受聘至2021年，另一份從2021年受聘至2026年，前後合共12年。 , M) E/ i: O. e4 r4 }, Ntvb now,tvbnow,bttvbtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb8 A! z- a$ Z' \/ n* s0 u" x
匿名信續稱，在遴選過程中，法律學院委員會成員何錦璇有份負責遴選新院長，到何耀明就任院長後，即提升何錦璇為法律學院系主任。信件直指，陳文敏在背後操控着今次事件。5.39.217.76& J# L' j4 y- _" Q
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。. h. T2 `$ Q# W8 S
但《星島》的報道，亦「據了解」及港大法律學院首席講師張達明意見指，類似何耀明「可自動續約的合約」（Rolling Contract），作為招聘院長等重要職位時的優厚條件，不足為奇。陳文敏亦沒直接參與遴選程序，校方在徵聘過程中，也曾諮詢學院教職員及兩大律師會意見，沒人對何耀明有異議。作者: felicity2010 時間: 2015-2-6 11:17 PM
