本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2015-2-6 08:38 AM 編輯 5 x8 @ k1 Q) ^+ y: B6 c1 x8 y: m: k' R) B: R 港大法學院長何耀明公開信全文 , C7 T8 L: `/ {; N. G & m* o: J. i0 fTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 * y n) d4 C% C. XThe Faculty of Law’s Response tothe RAE 2014 Report . F e0 h; w$ H8 j0 D- _' a公仔箱論壇 ( Y2 D* _- i! K8 w- hThere has been media interest in the last few days concerning the University Grants Committee (UGC)’s results of the Research Assessment Exercise 2014(RAE), particularly with the comparison between the law faculties of The University of Hong Kong and The Chinese University of Hong Kong.5.39.217.763 h Y/ g" K# t/ {% l2 r
7 E2 }. B- {5 t0 b" Y7 o, stvb now,tvbnow,bttvbWe begin by thanking the Law Panel of the RAE for completing a demanding and important task in such a professional manner, and we congratulate the Faculty of Law of The Chinese University of Hong Kong for its excellent achievement in the Exercise. It is a very good situation that all the law schools in Hong Kong SAR are collectively making a significant impact in Hong Kong, in the region and internationally.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% z( \3 Q& c1 u- o' R
What we wish to point out is well described on the UGC website and the Reading Guides of the RAE report:5.39.217.765 r6 e& x6 J f
6 V1 {6 ?1 S+ ]& O. H$ W2 X6 j: \" Utvb now,tvbnow,bttvb“On the interpretation of the RAE results of each institution, [it has been] emphasised that due regard should be given to the institutions’ different roles, missions, discipline focus and history.” (http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/press/2015/pr27012015.htm) ) _6 `# h% V, w0 `3 V2 j! s0 w5 H: s: n _, @) W: o* z( B3 \9 H! T
“The results are not for comparison purposes and not to be used in a standalone manner… [I]t is neither fair nor appropriate to compare the quality profiles of different institutions.” (Reading Guides1 and 5) 5.39.217.76+ c# A8 m0 A# s( E
! m2 Y4 U9 o8 I3 P( G3 [TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。The Faculty of Law of The University of Hong Kong is the oldest and the largest of the three law schools in Hong Kong.Historically, it has seen its mission to be both a law faculty that responds to the needs of the legal system and legal profession in Hong Kong and as part of the international community of legal scholars. It has sought to produce high quality research and publications in a way which has a high impact in both Hong Kong and global legal discourse. As an institution the HKU Law Faculty divides its time and resources between them. The RAE report on us in fact reflects this dual mission.公仔箱論壇: b# T8 h2 T" T, v# ]! ]
5.39.217.76 i- p- Y4 q# J$ B5 Y- F7 W
The Faculty wishes to dispel the suggestion or implication made in some quarters that it is not doing well in terms of research. The Faculty was, and is, aware that serving its mission to contribute to the Hong Kong community in general and the legal profession in particular might mean that it will sometimes be at the expense of doing more work with a global focus, but that is a trade-off the Faculty is proud to make. / @" v' J; @ Q6 b. y. m ' O. g9 l# v6 m% s; |& kThe Faculty does not, by any means, intend to convey the impression that it thinks that there is no room for improvement. It is the Faculty’s aim to be regarded amongst the top law schools in the world.The Faculty has been engaging in a wide-ranging exercise of institutional self-reflection and strategic planning. Many of the RAE panel’s suggestions on international collaboration and globally-focused research form a major part of our current research strategy. We shall, over the next few weeks, be discussing the RAE report very carefully to reflect on how we can do even better. Indeed, we are most grateful for the positive and critical feedback which the exercise has provided.公仔箱論壇' E# n8 @4 V- ?. X% r; q/ {1 r
0 r/ S/ H3 z+ u. X, X7 Ntvb now,tvbnow,bttvbWith the feedback gained from RAE and the continued support of the community, the Faculty looks forward to becoming even stronger in the coming years.5.39.217.76' B& X) h! b- J9 D9 s
& f: V* W0 u/ n) YTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Michael Hor% h$ C2 u" u6 M, y! y$ u
Dean 0 X6 h+ E/ B0 F3 l( e+ P$ j* ]Faculty of Law 6 G( R5 K1 S3 b5 n: W- W ^8 Ntvb now,tvbnow,bttvbThe University of Hong Kong ; U( R) C9 `/ @- p: K: _, _* @+ M2 j9 Q7 B* j: ^8 _ 作者: felicity2010 時間: 2015-2-6 08:44 AM
. I+ f0 D; L, E/ G0 `: @「有心人」對港大法律學院的攻擊繼續升級。隨該院新任院長何耀明，發公開信回應教資會報告披露該院研究項目去年水平，強調該院除研究外，更重視對貢獻香港社會的使命的消息昨日曝光後，《星島日報》今日就報道，收到匿名信指控，何耀明所獲合約異常優厚，質疑是否涉及前院長陳文敏。 + L) K1 w& Y. Z3 d5.39.217.76TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。4 J2 j) d* X# [! I
《星島》引述該匿名函件，院長一般的聘用年期是5年，但何耀明的合約，一份是從2014年受聘至2021年，另一份從2021年受聘至2026年，前後合共12年。% u% b5 G. u! y4 { `9 z
; b- M8 y: M) h2 u9 r$ ]3 }TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。匿名信續稱，在遴選過程中，法律學院委員會成員何錦璇有份負責遴選新院長，到何耀明就任院長後，即提升何錦璇為法律學院系主任。信件直指，陳文敏在背後操控着今次事件。$ p' B! V. i9 D3 u
