本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2014-8-15 12:40 PM 編輯 / z4 X1 V. }$ o C3 Q7 T# a) E9 [
3 ?7 h4 c1 q$ t8 `% B) h李國能﹕白皮書惹憂慮應澄清TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。4 ~" a- Y9 q5 a9 @; s" l5 y
& T* j( \1 @, A$ Q 8 ~, W7 m d4 L0 A! }) h" n公仔箱論壇5.39.217.76) S& B6 t+ X8 U2 B
# s8 Y$ @* \8 _2 t# H公仔箱論壇1.特首就2017年行政長官選舉辦法已提交報告，香港社會正殷切期待全國人民代表大會常務委員會就此將會如何作出決定。有決定後，政制改革進程將步入新階段。正如許多香港市民一樣，我對當前社會愈趨兩極化感到憂慮。在未來數月，我盼望社會大眾可以在《基本法》的框架內作出理性的討論，一切活動依法進行。最 重要的是，我希望參與討論的政界各方人士都能以明智和務實的態度尋求妥協，妥協的藝術畢竟是政治的本質，也是社會最佳利益之所在。 $ u) u4 u# Q7 Q/ @; n( C7 t! J2 j' M+ d. {, h
2.作為前首席大法官，我不適合參與政界中人這場極富挑戰性的討論，我只想和大家一起思索今天香港法治與司法獨立的景况。9 z, C0 ^, _( |* \- F
公仔箱論壇, f/ z0 W0 R m9 B- D
3.包含司法獨立的法治是香港社會在一國兩制下的基石，這是舉世公認的，它是香港這一制內至關重要的核心價值。+ I# y$ Q9 f# Y Q0 i
1 w0 ]8 w+ \6 t/ g$ O4.香港的法治涵蓋三大基要原則。首先，在法治之下每個人，包括統治者和被統治者，都遵守同一套的法律，這和人治的概念有明顯的區別。 7 s& {' P( w3 `9 j7 x- U. hTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb) f* Z0 M. O* c
5.其次，不論是市民與市民之間的糾紛，或市民與政府之間的糾紛，都由獨立的司法機關公平和不偏不倚地裁決。司法獨立是法治中不可或缺的元素，它有兩方面的涵義，一是作為一個機構司法機關獨立於行政及立法之外，二是每位法官審案都是獨立的，無論是一位法官單獨斷案或數位法官合議斷案。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。% c( \4 i" D8 [, {$ |: f& B
5.39.217.76' a. @" }1 U1 ?5 S( |
6.其三，法治包括對人權給予有效保障。一如聯合國《國際人權宣言》的序言指出，人權必須受「法治」（rule of law）保障，這就把「法律之治」（rule of law）與「以法治人」（rule by law）區分開來。 7 }& a6 A! ?: L9 m* o ; v" e5 Z- F/ l9 x$ v( ^& L* H5 ^0 q公仔箱論壇7.國務院新聞辦公室今年6月發表《「一國兩制」在香港特別行政區的實踐》白皮書，在香港引起對司法獨立廣泛的關注，這些關注是有其理據的。. u0 `4 E A* F. `) y) u9 F# Y# c
0 z( `1 }/ }4 t5.39.217.768.白皮書的英文版把法官列於''those who administrate Hong Kong''（i.e. administer）當中（立法機關成員也包括在內）。在香港，於權力分立的基礎上，行政、立法和司法機關在廣義上可被視為政府的三大分支或三大組成部分，但立法和司法機關並不是行政機關的一部分，白皮書的中文版以「治港」一詞來形容，看來它的意思應是指這個廣義說法。 , Z) \: h, l: V( Vtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb4 @+ O7 c# T- W* X( V
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。% |: O1 C0 R8 V! p+ }( {. `( m1 m
白皮書用''administrate''字眼不適當TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。7 e" i$ N) z3 |! v2 Z! t
7 T3 a; s" n6 L( f+ H9.不過，白皮書的英文版用了''administrate''這個字，這是很不幸的，也是不適當的，這個字在香港的一般理解是指行政當局，例如提及董建華政府、曾蔭權政府或梁振英政府時，英文都會採用 ''The Tung Chee Wah, the Donald Tsang or the CY Leung administration''。很明顯，司法機關不屬於行政當局（立法機關也不是）。這一方面最好能夠予以澄清，以消除任何因為採用''administrate''一字而引起的憂慮。5.39.217.76# b i! p% Y6 x/ w) `; {
2 G" f8 d' e6 R* Q3 n公仔箱論壇作者: felicity2010 時間: 2014-8-18 01:42 AM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2014-8-18 01:46 AM 編輯 8 k; L% s2 v# o5 U" F7 D
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb( N1 l8 ^/ O7 i" _2 `8 n. X7 H The Economist: Rule of law , G* u! ^7 P/ Q0 u, y: I4 M Realigning justice/ v# p$ I( s4 e& g4 s2 L) D
# n5 O* V( U$ i公仔箱論壇16 Aug 2014 ) \" m2 Q. W" p/ f% N9 B. |TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Judges are often impotent in China’s courtrooms. That might be changing' N5 m+ _. C) P* [6 b: ?
! j* u X3 V4 C+ H) ?TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。1 L: p* `& w% D6 Q' y
) \" }# w% B, G9 A
IN JULY Zhou Qiang, the president of China’s Supreme People’s Court, visited Yan’an, the spiritual home of the Communist Party in rural Shaanxi province, to lead local court officials there in an old communist ritual: self-criticism. “I have grown accustomed to having the final say and often have preconceived ideas when making decisions,” one local judge told the meeting. “I try to avoid taking a stand in major cases,” said a judicial colleague. “I don’t want to get into trouble.”tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb7 w$ G' d+ v7 X+ k
( Q* F+ O: {: R& m5.39.217.76In China’s judiciary such shortcomings are the norm. But change may be coming. On July 29th it was announced that the party’s Central Committee, comprising more than 370leaders, will gather in October to discuss ways of strengthening the rule of law, a novelty for such a gathering. President Xi Jinping, who is waging a sweeping campaign against corruption, says he wants the courts to help him “lock power in a cage”. Officials have begun to recognise that this will mean changing the kind of habits that prevail in Yan’an and throughout the judicial system. 1 w1 k! ^" M# v4 V, T公仔箱論壇* } z% g( q+ y3 p
Long before Mr Xi, leaders had often talked about the importance of the rule of law. But they showed little enthusiasm for reforms that would take judicial authority away from party officials and give it to judges. The court system in China is often just a rubber-stamp for decisions made in secret by party committees in cahoots with police and prosecutors. The party still cannot abide the idea of letting a freely elected legislature write the laws, nor even of relinquishing its control over the appointment of judges. But it is talking up the idea of making the judiciary serve as the constitution says it should: “independently ... and not subject to interference”. ' T! E: S8 E. HTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 : O1 m% O; {8 O. U; T5 Y+ |In June state media revealed that six provincial-level jurisdictions would become testing grounds for reforms.Full details have not been announced, but they appear aimed at allowing judges to decide more for themselves, at least in cases that are not politically sensitive.( i* e/ Z. g" l4 F; D8 l
5.39.217.76. \' Q( `; H" C
There is a lot of room for improvement. Judges are generally beholden to local interests. They are hired and promoted at the will of their jurisdiction’s party secretary (or people who report to him), and they usually spend their entire careers at the same court in which they started. They have less power in their localities than do the police or prosecutors, or even politically connected local businessmen. A judge is often one of the least powerful figures in his own courtroom.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb' h* d* G* h0 m$ o0 L8 Q
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb) r; x# `' L$ E5 t2 _
“It’s not a career that gets much respect,”says Ms Sun, a former judge in Shanghai who quit her job this year (and who asked to be identified only by her surname). The port city is one of the reform test-beds. “Courts are not independent so as a result they don’t have credibility, and people don’t believe in the law.” She says people often assume judges are corrupt. 4 p- x2 O, s& L, ]/ y" J nTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 ( i% o! E Q- O# R7 _: u; WCareer prospects are unappealing for the young and well-educated like Ms Sun, who got her law degree from Peking University. The overall quality of judges has risen dramatically in recent decades, but there are still plenty of older, senior judges with next to no formal legal training. Seeing no opportunity for advancement after eight years,Ms Sun left for a law firm and a big multiple of her judge’s salary of about120,000 yuan ($19,000) a year. She says many other young judges are leaving.公仔箱論壇* k* W S! [* V! H, j" g2 E
/ Q$ e1 d1 b) z5 o: v0 O9 S; fTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。It is unclear how much the mooted changes will alleviate these concerns. Those Shanghai courts that are participating in the pilot reforms (not all are) are expected to raise judges’ pay. They are also expected greatly to reduce the number of judges, though younger ones fear they are more likely to be culled than their less qualified but better connected seniors. # F' X: L; i+ n' C& e- c 4 @; \; ]" V/ r* z* }The most important reforms will affect the bureaucracies that control how judges are hired and promoted.Responsibility will be taken away from the cities and counties where judges try their cases, or from the districts in the case of provincial-level mega cities like Shanghai. It will be shifted upwards to provincial-level authorities—in theory making it more difficult for local officials to persuade or order judges to see things their way on illegal land seizures, polluting factories and soon.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。* }* J: f l% V) D
) _* |" B$ c- _! N7 A公仔箱論壇Central leaders have a keen interest in stamping out such behaviour because it tarnishes the party’s image. But many local officials, some of whom make a lot of money from land-grabs and dirty factories, will resist change. With the help of the police they will probably find other means to make life difficult for unco-operative judges. And provincial authorities are still likely to interfere in some cases handled by lower-level courts, sometimes in order to help out county-level officials.0 v8 t" g, m: U1 ~; w: t
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb" X9 V& b, O, n" M
An oft-stated goal of the reforms is that “judges should decide the cases they hear, and they should hear the cases they decide.” But Mr Xi is also making it clear that the party remains the ultimate arbiter. He is trying to boost loyalty to the party among judges and other court officials by requiring they attend ideological“study sessions”. Most judges and prosecutors are party members. & I, L$ K+ J1 _, x6 t( J( O. _* Q% e# J
The party is also clamping down further on defence lawyers who take on politically sensitive cases. The feistiest are often harassed by police or even jailed for speaking out about injustices. In June it emerged that the party-run All China Lawyers Association had drafted guidelines discouraging both legal activism and public criticism of court decisions. The rule of law seems to mean running the courts more efficiently but still in the service of the party.5.39.217.76$ h6 A2 f3 r9 E+ o, k" {; Z
5.39.217.76) S& B6 t+ X8 U2 B
1 L: p* `& w% D6 Q' y