! {& s; E0 d9 R( N. p, i- B2 P電文封面有署名「CDP」的手寫意見，指出「這是另一向前的重大一步。他們接受我們就憲制方面提出的要求」。當時戴卓爾的私人秘書，是外交部借調到首相府的外交官CharlesDavid Powell。【註5】tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb9 Z0 w- K" O h" G' t, ]
5.39.217.76$ t% x0 v y g% n- C4 a2 X
再推早一點，9月8日，伊文思電文倫敦，指他曾跟周南討論。周南指出中方的立場非常堅決。中方提出，在協議訂明行政長官應由選舉或協商產生。【註6】至於立法機關，則在「理論層面」應該由選舉產生，至少長遠如是，但未知到1997年之時的客觀因素是否合適。 ) [: B. j+ ^3 @( J1 ~7 S5.39.217.76 % L4 z1 w4 I- N) `3 J' G) C. `5 FTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。而在2天之前（即9月6日），賀維在他致戴卓爾夫人的一份文件中，則指出中方拒絕在關於1997年政府架構方面，承諾任何超越「通過選舉或協商產生」行政長官的說法。他們拒絕指明立法機關將選舉產生，或行政機關須向立法機關負責。賀維指出，選舉產生的立法機關是香港特區未來自治的根本，必須強烈要求。他因此認為，英方應準備接受中方就行政長官產生辦法的立場作交換。【註7】公仔箱論壇" F, W: [6 g3 }7 ^! t Q
! z& y' F7 h( Q2 i9 ]
雖然行政長官和臨時立法會在1997年都是由「選舉」產生，但選民基礎僅為推選委員會的400人。即使至今，立法會仍有一半議席屬功能界別。《聯合聲明》和《基本法》雖訂明行政機關須向立法會負責，但北京和特區當局都強調須行政主導，立法會無法有效監督制衡。而行政長官普選，則在主權移交的20年後，仍可能會在有篩選、有入閘無出閘的小圈子模式下達至。英方的「成功爭取」，和中方的承諾，究竟何時能真正兌現？公仔箱論壇# |/ Z+ v; @' L& U T$ a
公仔箱論壇" B& G: Z) ~! T0 Y$ b- I
– ) \( Y: r1 W2 [2 v: ftvb now,tvbnow,bttvb公仔箱論壇0 M' }9 Z3 p. F0 [% t
9 i) l3 D( [& h# q" ~* V: x+ k8 C8 Utvb now,tvbnow,bttvb註1：原文為「On constitutional arrangements, we did not succeed in persuading the Chinese that the Chief Executive of Hong Kong should be elected immediately in 1997 (although the agreement does leave open the possibility that he might be so elected). But throughout the negotiations we have had the closest consultations with the Executive Council. We have brought them to accept at each point that we had achieved the maximum that was possible from the Chinese.」 6 T# N) _4 e( B) L/ L% u: @5.39.217.76 & @- |9 m5 b1 B5.39.217.76tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb' b6 W; s) w6 r+ C( B3 g
註2：「We believe that what we have today is a reasonable agreement, the best that can be achieved, and one which we can commend to the people of Hong Kong in good conscience.」TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。3 i- G( ]; Y/ M: ]7 n0 A4 t
: S! C9 ]: l6 M" }# g0 k: ]公仔箱論壇2 _0 C5 W/ g5 i; c6 T4 v
註3：「The Chinese are known to be opposed to direct elections and generally wary of the development of representative institutions. But they have agreed that the Agreement should provide for an elected legislature after 1997. It will be impracticable to introduce direct elections without at least the tacit acquiescence of the Chinese.」公仔箱論壇! l3 u) c- G2 O
. h0 Q5 t( L: \/ _公仔箱論壇 - I6 N& S3 a5 d6 e3 @- r$ Rtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb註4：「Wu noted from your message that we were prepared to accept the Chinese position that the Chief Executive of the SAR should be selected by election or consultation. After careful consideration, the Chinese side were prepared in return to agree to the two requests in your message, i.e.: (a) that the text of Annex 1 should state that the legislature should be selected by an elective process (semicolon) and(b) that the executive authority should be accountable to the legislature.」 ) H Q/ X. u! T/ J. ?: x5.39.217.76公仔箱論壇9 p' Q. ~ n0 h/ r0 y
5.39.217.766 ^( G4 {, K- |! e9 H
註5：「This is another big step forward. They have accepted our points on the constitutional arrangements;」（「big step forward」和「our points on the constitutional arrangements」都有畫線。）& g( ~8 H$ z0 d
5.39.217.76, ^! A+ I5 ]9 Y' Z r; r$ m
4 ]1 @/ q& R$ O5 k- G註6：「Zhou said that the Chinese position was firm. The structure of the future SAR government would be stipulated in the Basic Law. The Chinese proposed that the agreement should state that the chief executive should be chosen by election or consultation.This was reasonable, because it would in practice be difficutl（原文串法）to per-determined the method by which he should be chosen.」 6 O% p4 ~, b' z' z- x' xtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb * [: r: _% {' [% ]/ A* C v : F6 h. d$ P' d( x- Z: a5.39.217.76註7：「Next is the question of constitutional arrangements. The Chinese are refusing to commit themselves on the structure of government after 1997 beyond saying that the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong SAR should be chosen “by election or consultation". They have refused to specify that the legislature will be elected or the executive authority should be answerable to the legislature. We see an elected legislature as fundamental to the autonomy of the future Hong Kong SAR and must press for it strongly. Here I proposed saying that we should be prepared to accept the Chinese line that the Chief Executive could be chosen by election or consultation in return for a statement that the legislature should be elected and that the executive should be answerable to it.」公仔箱論壇& f4 M9 O; C- X7 L I3 `
. B1 r- x. o' @/ x+ F% e% [tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb 3 Y L; ]) Y& ^- @1 z) s 9 E: }/ Z0 d4 z6 E# B! U% O1 D5 Q # L. k. X7 J- M' W; j: _tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb作者: felicity2010 時間: 2014-1-14 11:55 AM
公仔箱論壇: O( j. F# F- ~' k. a( n3 g* y1 U