公仔箱論壇 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師 [打印本頁]

作者: moonlight1812 時間: 2013-8-9 10:00 PM 標題: 飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師

唔知點解劇中講到飛機維修好似做地盤一樣？TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。) Q+ m$ w/ {5 ^$ Q* q0 D
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。& _9 J* J8 z: M, e2 j4 R% r% Z" ]) G y
就算做到飛機工程師都係一樣！

TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。" T# r, E* S9 r: I" u) q: p5 A
5.39.217.768 D4 H; Y# _( Y/ Y1 b) i7 f
雖然物理上真係一個在天、一個在地。

作者: tedlost 時間: 2013-8-12 01:05 AM

真的。。。不解释了

作者: bugbear1945 時間: 2013-8-12 09:37 PM

事實係咁
我十年前都差D去左做維修員
同做文員差唔多個價中三就做到

作者: 屁屁zzz 時間: 2013-8-13 08:21 PM

really? i thought you need a university degree

作者: yy66 時間: 2013-8-14 10:49 AM

飛機師人工高D

作者: mg005 時間: 2013-8-14 10:51 AM

做維修只是技工,叫工程師只是好聽

作者: milito 時間: 2013-8-14 07:16 PM

如果做到夏晨這個位有三萬五至四萬人工，照哥是工程師有4萬至4萬5人工。屬於專業人事。

作者: colourbeast 時間: 2013-8-15 09:16 AM

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: garciabox 時間: 2013-8-18 05:29 PM

totally agree

作者: mrfusion 時間: 2013-8-18 06:01 PM

They are not engineer, they are mechanics, like a car mechanics you see in the garage.
5.39.217.76( J1 w& C8 b1 N* D+ h% R/ M% A$ @- o
Engineer actually need to create/build something. Plane Engineer build/design planes, what these people in the drama does are just mechanics, they repairs and replace planes.公仔箱論壇7 F! q3 Z# _( O- ]. o6 b1 Q8 g
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb- {$ ?3 S7 d/ E5 N, x( R7 C( H4 g0 d
Engineer wrote plane instruction manuals, 夏晨's mechanic team read and follow it.

作者: flight55 時間: 2013-8-18 06:24 PM

aircraft engineering isn't that good of a job in hk.. specially the paid, on the other hand, pilots as second officer earn more than being an licensed engineer.. and free sandwiches too so=sandwich eaters

作者: ongong84 時間: 2013-8-19 11:19 AM

Pilot's salary always is better...

作者: mg005 時間: 2013-8-19 11:27 AM

我認為維修的只應該稱技工,設計製造的才可叫工程師,

作者: riverchild 時間: 2013-8-22 03:06 PM

呢個世界係咁架啦, PILOT 係最巴閉~

作者: simonkok 時間: 2013-8-23 05:30 PM

飛機師當然是人工好啦...要講天份的.....

作者: kitkit1989 時間: 2013-8-24 04:56 PM

飛機師當然是高尚D~(特別係香港)

作者: pcmiow 時間: 2013-8-28 09:57 PM

止不过是制服的问题

作者: wan.ming 時間: 2013-8-28 10:26 PM

飛機師當然是人工比飛機工程師好好多

作者: goonerwong1927 時間: 2013-8-29 12:27 AM

Pilots have a shorter active working life whereas mechanics might be able to carry on for longer.

作者: 鬼虎 時間: 2013-8-29 11:54 PM

我都係工程師. 咪又係做到好似做地盤咁.....

作者: mrfusion 時間: 2013-8-31 12:04 PM

Pilots have a shorter active working life whereas mechanics might be able to carry on for longer.5.39.217.76' U: K. b- C' d# }1 _
goonerwong1927 發表於 2013-8-29 12:27 AM

* n: A0 P" M. j3 W2 w ~% j
What are you talking about, unless a pilot developed serious health issues, pilot can work till they are 60 or 65, maybe longer.

Sam and Tony in the series is acting as 45+.

Taylor (駱應鈞) in the first series is also have to be about 50, and is still going strong.

Whereas a aircraft maintenance technician is a very strength demanding job, the shortage of staff in the field mean most will work long hours and likely to be injured from time to time, and may no longer be suitable by about 50.

作者: HarleyGold 時間: 2013-8-31 01:15 PM

飛機師難做d

作者: okx321 時間: 2013-9-1 12:34 AM

现实系甘样架啦

作者: carcar88 時間: 2013-9-1 01:34 PM

Pilot's salary always is better..x2

作者: rice888 時間: 2013-9-1 02:24 PM

真的。。。不解释了公仔箱論壇" p5 h# {1 ^% O, r8 J! T
tedlost 發表於 2013-8-12 01:05 AM

pls explain ...

作者: chacha610 時間: 2013-9-1 06:02 PM

行行出狀元

作者: beyond4 時間: 2013-9-13 08:03 AM

thanks for sharing

作者: lucy105 時間: 2013-9-14 03:33 PM

就係睇件制服都系飛機師型D啦

作者: andypanghk1021 時間: 2013-9-16 01:58 AM

飛機師有冷氣嘆.唔洗咁大汗嘛

作者: racing_ken 時間: 2013-9-23 11:43 AM

機師吸引D

作者: ekincheang 時間: 2013-10-6 10:30 PM

政府文員,辦公室文員,地盤文員....都係文員!!!

作者: ekincheang 時間: 2013-10-6 10:30 PM

政府文員,辦公室文員,地盤文員....都係文員!!! 但要求不同..

歡迎光臨公仔箱論壇 (http://5.39.217.76/)