( K) ]6 d v. j. I: a$ S( Y+ R公仔箱論壇百姓皆謂我自然 1 Q/ e: |6 R: r# n/ A' M / C# D2 \( p G% o) u* z是什麼的「特殊材料」？老子這樣說：「信不足焉，有不信焉。」張默生先生這樣解說：「在上的誠信不足，所以人民自然不能信仰他。」各位，你說這像不像梁振英政府施政癱瘓的癥結？嘴巴說全心全意服務市民，找來做事的卻是邵善波、吳克儉、張炳良、高靜芝……般的貨色，那又像是言行一致麼？人民不信任你，但又莫奈之何，除了鄙視不屑，七百萬人又還做得什麼？tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% A! a! h9 O1 t& Q# h2 F) W/ |$ }
4 l3 i* l' X7 ~" H; Htvb now,tvbnow,bttvb老子不只斷症，更作出有益、有建設性的忠告：「悠兮其貴言。」張默生這樣解說：「不要多事更張、不要亂發命令，使人民得以安居樂業。」即是不要一天到晚干預這個、干預那個。 % I- a3 T3 O( B$ ktvb now,tvbnow,bttvb . g5 u' c& A$ Q; x+ m. VTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。抑制干預所為者何？騰出空間讓人民發揮幹勁創意。人們有廣闊空間多所發揮，「功成事遂，百姓皆謂我自然。」——人民知道命運在我手，弄出成果，一切榮耀歸於自己，那個喜樂又豈是執權者所能賜予的？ 0 w4 g# C5 w, ]+ u- y7 U$ x6 \6 u) KTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。! y. i! f+ f: [! T; p
事實上這不正也是「積極不干預」的要義嗎？不要以為積極不干預執權者便繑起雙手，什麼都不用做。非也。即使不「多事更張」，社會上可有這種、那種利益壓力團體要利用政府的權勢為他們效力；不費一番氣力難以制止這些「尋租」行為。故此積極不干預非但要有識見，更要有勇氣和承擔。3 n8 M1 o Y- D) W$ a! q( @" m7 K
4 _' n" H+ v% a/ u/ W7 D* o
即以紅磡隧道而言。從望後鏡看，那當然是再好沒有的交通基建設施。可是當初牽頭的商家既要政府提供財政支持，更要道路交通接駁予與各種方便。面對這些壓力需索，積極不干預又談何容易？最終郭伯偉從土地的使用權、道路網絡收費等各方面捍衞了納稅人的權益。這樣的積極不干預，極考功夫，二、三流腳色哪有這個本事？tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb. J6 \# a! j! h1 N- T: c+ c. ]
( D- ~% ^: t( O) z" | 重建誠信乃急中之急 b. j; d: O( B$ m" Z1 V
/ F6 c' T( f A& f JTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。在今日的香港，難以奢望會有另一個郭伯偉或夏鼎基了。起碼在積極不干預的層面，「英國人能，香港人更能」只是兌現無從的豪情壯語而已。擺在眼前的事實是，七百萬人對梁振英政府「有不信焉」，那麼與其一天到晚「一項政策成熟即推出一項」，更又要成立第二個權力核心以示強政勵治，上上之舉又豈非調校思維，把當前急務——以坦蕩蕩的透明度重建誠信——放在第一位？說到底，為人民鄙視的政府是有為不起來的。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb; y' f/ c! |7 @& E# @, k
! e+ L$ t4 Q4 e' N何如自在？/ J( r- c6 H) F% _ h
5.39.217.76( y* | s R# O/ X2 w1 |
習近平的名言，人權沒有最好，只有更好。當真？公仔箱論壇2 ]5 t# `8 f% Q* Q
]2 S e) }' g7 E5 H$ v1 i L究竟中心在回歸後替中策組做了什麼研究及民調、收了幾多公帑，中心回覆指，內部運作不會公開。負責中策組傳媒查詢的保安局沒有回覆。立法會文件曾零碎指出，中心在○三年替中策組做的單一專題研究，收了一百三十萬元顧問費。今個財政年度中策組獲公帑撥款八千四百萬元營運。8 f1 u( F5 E( ^8 E2 `- C
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb; T5 j T3 U8 a; h( x
顧汝德說：「我的中策組無外判過任何研究，我有最叻人才、又有唔同界別的人俾意見，唔需要嘥錢搵外人。」顧指，九七前他已將中策組文件運返英國，二○二七年便會解封，到時大眾便知道他領導的中策組真貌。但回歸後香港沒有檔案法，換言之中策組閉門造車，公眾將永遠被蒙在鼓裡。 : D6 i0 n; [/ x# x7 D4 y # Y6 d; ^( `, X: P5.39.217.76左王言論惹火TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。; R0 C5 d& x4 O$ N7 ^$ G; F
5.39.217.76% o! H# E. M0 ^
直通北京、與中策組關係密切的一國兩制研究中心，由梁振英及邵善波打骰近廿年。六十三歲的邵善波八十年代起便與梁振英拍住為北京效力，由新華社香港分社副社長毛鈞年引薦出任基本法諮詢委員會副秘書長，是秘書長梁振英的副手。梁振英的黨員疑雲來自這高職，邵善波亦曾被懷疑是黨一分子。公仔箱論壇2 V \7 R* ~/ R. W# Q( g
9 u# x2 s5 Q5 g2 N. O utvb now,tvbnow,bttvb邵善波中學讀九龍華仁書院，是校內風頭躉，既是學生會副會長、又搞校報、練長跑。畢業後赴美威斯康辛大學、後到康奈爾大學研究院，主修工業及勞工關係。他居於洛杉磯時創辦華文書報社，替左傾的《七十年代》雜誌在當地發行，後來自行創辦同樣靠左的《焦點》雜誌。據了解，邵善波在美時活躍華人圈子，估計搭上駐美中國大使，其名字再轉到毛鈞年手上。5.39.217.76' Q9 z6 T1 W: X! ?1 v
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。) r O3 K8 V8 m4 M. n6 x* V& G0 u
六四不單沒有令邵善波轉軚，他的親中地位更鞏固，北京組織一班大孖沙成立一國兩制研究中心，為過渡搶佔輿論陣地，成員包括提拔梁振英的全國政協副主席安子介、東亞李國寶、塑膠大王黃保欣等，由邵善波出任中心總幹事十七年。中心董事現為陳啟宗及張信剛，前年捐款收入多達六百四十萬元。 : H p) Y/ S5 x/ c* V3 V" N/ t q, R公仔箱論壇公仔箱論壇( i& C7 m/ g* m/ P% _
「回歸初期邵善波無入官場，因要守住中心。」○七年邵善波接替當局長的曾德成入中策組，有傳他是中聯辦屬意。 3 b7 b @: ?( ~ p0 r X- z |, {" K. f經常口出狂言的邵善波金句多多，曾說六四已發生多年外界毋須再糾纏平反問題。○三七一後又指「有拳頭不等於有道理」，認為○七年不宜普選特首。心繫家國宣傳片被指洗腦，邵自說自話：「我日日睇纖體廣告，如果可以洗腦，我現在不會有個大肚腩。」; q0 L" G1 H: a: x* i" P. p
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2012-12-1 06:25 AM 編輯 ! J# x" x& m j, H- ]. O 2 I( ?3 o5 L/ pStephen Brown: Interfere No MoreTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。9 \) C/ ^7 F# d+ {4 X& [
2012年11月29日 9 X ~( Q6 u( p( J5 Z公仔箱論壇tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb" Q, _* r) |2 p* a0 K7 z' E
# t1 Z& `8 A& h: I
The last few weeks have seen the continued stagnation of the Leung Administration,as policy initiatives stumble and as the Administration seems unable to manage a united front. 7 C- m2 f/ r+ _; M" a5.39.217.76 $ p) @2 s7 P$ h, qSome of the events that have undermined the Administration have been self inflicted,while others, such as appointing an investment banker to Exco whose qualification seemed to be that he owned 27 properties must be seen by the public as being downright stupid.公仔箱論壇* N6 J' G: n3 d4 O+ J H6 n; U3 m
But,despite these ups and downs, the real problem is the fact that we are still not clear about what C.Y. Leung and his team stand for, which became an even bigger issue when he decided to push back the Policy Address to early 2013. ! ?2 x9 X4 p7 Y+ \2 ntvb now,tvbnow,bttvbTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。9 b P4 b. L! v$ D/ t
Looking at moves such as those to support the less well off, it is not clear if this is a portent of more social expenditure going forward, or if there is going to be some universal integration of benefits so that those people who are not able to gain access to public housing, for example, are not substantially dis-advantaged.1 _0 M9 C0 W7 S7 r4 p( ]
0 o* r# e L) a) N6 c5.39.217.76Similarly,we have seen an Administration that has been harping on about Mainland integration while, at the same time, having to heed the cries of the local populace and starts putting in administrative measures to halt the one-way torrent of people coming across the border.公仔箱論壇) C0 [" f8 d! U3 j( i5 x
0 b* y. p3 R/ ]) RAnd where does this Administration stand on economic policy? We have no clue either here, from what I can see. The portents here are not good, however. ' \0 w0 K+ d! J! W1 {% m+ GThe clumsy intervention into the property market by penalizing those who are not Hong Kong abode holders is not a smart move. ( H/ q. |/ H8 G8 |3 ctvb now,tvbnow,bttvb公仔箱論壇, a$ x& B2 M% o
First off, it does not, as a Government spokesman stated at the time, give a preference to those that are committed to Hong Kong. It merely gives a benefit to those that have the right of abode here. % S( r5 h0 `8 |- X# }公仔箱論壇5.39.217.76' y8 k' O& Z$ i5 o E% S
For instance, my two grown up children benefit from their residency status for all sorts of things, including avoiding the latest stamp duty measures, though they only irregularly return from overseas where they are students.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb; }, `8 i% G9 e
5.39.217.76. p% X7 Q5 u1 O0 A/ H. h
They qualify for HOS and PRH public housing units because, as students, they still have no income; they can come back for free health care and later in life retire here and get the public to pick up the bill. And, of course,non-resident holders of the right of abode can sit across the border and use our educational and other services every day- for free. 3 B% H# Q' m/ v # g6 P2 d. k! `6 j: \! {! g公仔箱論壇This nonsensical stamp duty discrimination highlights just how wrong the Government is when it adjudges the right of abode to be the basis for receiving free public sector goods and services, irrespective of the ordinary residency of the people claiming the benefit. . e+ X; ]1 H$ A( A% o9 i( x' `公仔箱論壇! B/ A8 f- |+ i
Secondly,and more importantly, what the random stamp duty initiative undoubtedly does do is send a message to all around the world that policy in Hong Kong in relation to assets, their price levels and investment overall will in future be subject to ad hoc Government measures, as and when they see fit. Will they put a capital gains tax on stock transactions if the Hang Seng Index soars? " R) x8 a; D9 o' h8 ^. }/ l( ~TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。: \. D9 X2 o7 j& n3 R2 @
And then, finally, when it comes to the punitive taxation of property transactions,reducing liquidity in the major domestic asset market, and one that is used for funding all sorts of economic activities and which is a key component of household balance-sheets, is simply not smart. * X; K3 i8 q+ \& J" B5 I5.39.217.76 3 Y, g4 G- M% P2 x# J& k; M1 m! n公仔箱論壇We needed the meat put on the bones of the Chief Executive’ s Election Manifesto,but we are now months on from the election and the skeleton is still the only thing you can find in the shop window. 0 L( \9 d6 x# q8 `tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb $ {% Q) m9 }. d- q公仔箱論壇You do not have to be an evangelical Republican to believe that excessive government interference is not the way to go, but the early signs are that we will get more frequent and increasingly dis-jointed policy initiatives that simply compound the perceived problems that they seek to address.) ^8 K, r5 K' U) V4 U
0 \3 @ \: t/ v! tIn reality, C.Y. Leung just needs to do one or two simple things as a start: give the people of Hong Kong a break and start to solve a few issues with clear structural reforms,and stand back. How about for a start giving public housing away to its occupants and making sure that only those who have been ordinarily resident for seven years can get on the public sector gravy train.1 ]. l8 X# s9 S
9 m" i' |1 @: w4 l2 N" u! n5.39.217.76tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb2 v$ d" w8 Z) I- Z Stephen Brown is a director of the Civic Exchange, a Hong Kong-based think tank
