- D9 A$ H! Y& Z( w! ]$ S# Htvb now,tvbnow,bttvbPS: This analysis from 陶傑 is simple and biased. It is very dangerous to base our view on a single point while neglecting the historical complexities. It is dubious that the Allied powers understood the extent and severity of the massacre of Jews (a national machinery to carry it out) and the means they could use to stop it in the heat of war. He also fails to mention the influence the Jews wielding on US politics, the recent example would be Newt Gingrich's election campaign is financed by Sheldon Adelson, a staunch pro-Israel billionaire. If we take the Jewish influence in other sectors like finance, politics, academia and media (radio, TV and film industry) into consideration, we would begin to understand the 'change' in Obama's stance to Israel from the beginning to the current period of his presidency. In this election year, Obama is hijacked, literally. As for the preemptive strike, the US deployed that tactic in her War on Iraq that left no moral ground for US to persuade Israel to do otherwise. Despite his frivolous premise, he may still have a point. Israel keeps using the Holocaust to justify her military actions however illegitimate, anyone dares to raise an opposition would be labelled as an advocate of antisemitism. & { d1 ^' s: t0 \