3 `& Y1 e' W0 d公仔箱論壇邱吉爾說:我調動不了空軍。國防部否決空襲,說沒有用。猶太人幾乎滅族,死了幾百萬。5.39.217.76( g' T( M. r, ]* e" M" ^
( G! I5 _0 [3 K+ z
戰後,猶太人看清楚所謂「國際公義」是什麼東西:我滅族時,既然全世界都不管我(其實很諷刺地,歐洲沒有向納粹交出猶太人,反而是西班牙、意大利、葡萄牙這三個法西斯政府),那麼以後,我做什麼事,為了保障我的生存,我也不理,滾你媽的國際輿論和全世界了。* V: Y* b1 r4 I
& F; p6 @' ~6 |& a0 G+ U& dtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb慣了做奴隸的人看看,這就叫做骨氣和尊嚴了。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb8 j( S- _4 }$ R
3 S5 D! g! D" d0 I8 p
PS: This analysis from 陶傑 is simple and biased. It is very dangerous to base our view on a single point while neglecting the historical complexities. It is dubious that the Allied powers understood the extent and severity of the massacre of Jews (a national machinery to carry it out) and the means they could use to stop it in the heat of war. He also fails to mention the influence the Jews wielding on US politics, the recent example would be Newt Gingrich's election campaign is financed by Sheldon Adelson, a staunch pro-Israel billionaire. If we take the Jewish influence in other sectors like finance, politics, academia and media (radio, TV and film industry) into consideration, we would begin to understand the 'change' in Obama's stance to Israel from the beginning to the current period of his presidency. In this election year, Obama is hijacked, literally. As for the preemptive strike, the US deployed that tactic in her War on Iraq that left no moral ground for US to persuade Israel to do otherwise. Despite his frivolous premise, he may still have a point. Israel keeps using the Holocaust to justify her military actions however illegitimate, anyone dares to raise an opposition would be labelled as an advocate of antisemitism. 7 ?, ^3 f* s3 ]% F