標題: Did we ever invade any countries? [打印本頁] 作者: norman.ho 時間: 2011-11-11 08:46 AM 標題: Did we ever invade any countries?
本帖最後由 norman.ho 於 2011-11-11 09:00 AM 編輯 - U$ W9 Q0 S/ b/ ~ ' o+ d. o3 J& w4 t+ u0 S- \* Etvb now,tvbnow,bttvbUS Marine base for Darwin * H" e- Y8 ^6 p# a& U: {TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。November 11, 2011. Peter Hartcher Sydney Morning Herald political editor / Q* t' C) L" S" S" \+ e) C. V" c1 `
BARACK OBAMA is to announce that the US will begin rotating Marines through an Australian base in Darwin in a permanent new military presence, intensifying the alliance in a sign of heightened concern about China. $ n3 z( e0 a3 x( u7 J( d+ {) @, ptvb now,tvbnow,bttvb: |8 [" h" y" {( l" `" Y+ b3 H- C6 ?
He is scheduled to make the announcement with the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, when they visit Darwin next Thursday during Mr Obama's first visit to Australia as president. The 26-hour visit will mark the 60th anniversary of the ANZUS alliance.公仔箱論壇6 V) {% C! S' P* p+ B- e
' S! q1 M |2 ]( j5 c& y4 y0 ~ vtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbThe Marines are the chief US ground combat force in the Pacific theatre, the so-called ''tip of the spear''. 1 i" w4 _' e8 n9 c2 I: w$ ?9 A" ~2 K+ `4 w& }; c; w7 x) h. T
0 ]3 J& N" S9 v0 b- v Two-thirds of all US Marines are based in the Pacific, with big concentrations at US bases on Okinawa Island in Japan and Guam, a US territory 2000 kilometres north of Papua New Guinea.8 Z, u2 G, y5 A ]$ E: W7 U
, y( z g4 c, o ^+ f! A''This is all about the rise of China, the modernisation of the People's Liberation Army and, particularly, it's about the increased vulnerability of US forces in Japan and Guam to the new generation of Chinese missiles,'' said Alan Dupont, the Michael Hintze professor of international security at Sydney University. ( @3 D) k# W) \4 M# N5.39.217.76作者: norman.ho 時間: 2011-11-11 08:55 AM
And just some stats on US Marines presence in Asia to give a better picture:& D+ C- w* ~7 U
% I6 R+ B4 b& M
S. Korea: 31,893.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。, \& V% O1 B( a) Y. C
Japan: 40,201. % j g2 e/ g6 b; P! kGuam: 4,958. , m7 U5 x) c0 v' ]Hawaii: 55,016.5.39.217.76# s2 Y1 p0 k3 T, s& \& |
& ]/ s4 E3 {5 w+ i: R* V8 ETVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Now, answer these questions and get a $TVB888:5.39.217.76* f7 C& m) K* A" R! W; t
5 B" J$ t, z, |tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbWhich country invaded Vietnam? & d$ Y: g& R5 k9 e: r( x5.39.217.76Which country invaded Iraq? 8 s$ d6 ?3 p0 m) l4 x公仔箱論壇Which country invaded East Timor? 3 y; F6 R; e' D% ^. ktvb now,tvbnow,bttvbWhich country did China invade?作者: norman.ho 時間: 2011-11-11 09:29 AM
本帖最後由 norman.ho 於 2011-11-11 09:36 AM 編輯 # V4 l6 ?7 p. l) C% y
5.39.217.76' [8 G, J6 n: F. ?
And here are some stats on US Weapons of Mass Destruction: ) ~ ?1 h* ~2 R3 x& \TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。source:Wikipedia, F% I2 o8 B6 s3 g http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction ' H1 ^, X, F9 q3 T9 {& v d9 M$ M. T& S: Q" |: ]
Nuclear program start date 21 October 1939 " A# k: y* }5 g. V( i5.39.217.76First nuclear weapon test 16 July 1945 ( ]+ j/ N4 J$ xFirst fusion weapon test 1 November 1952 l2 k0 Z& s% g1 w7 l3 Y9 {5 u公仔箱論壇Last nuclear test 23 September 1992tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb7 \5 p$ g/ `' _: \' Z. H7 R3 y& R8 u
Largest yield test 15 Mt (1 March 1954) (Mega tons)& S q3 S Z6 h& J2 E4 z- t# g
Total tests 1,054 detonations 7 S) |1 y6 k, M/ q; `Peak stockpile 32,225 warheads (1966) 3 Q+ C% r$ t' C. Rtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbCurrent stockpile 5,113 total 0 `; H6 D5 }1 m7 M" W- m I5.39.217.76Maximum missile range 13,000 km (8,100 mi) (land)$ o- g1 O6 w! r* w0 X
12,000 km (7,500 mi) (sub)6 y9 [- j) }1 Z
p: P8 e) \6 e c F) a4 w; g$ x1 o1 g% O9 x& w7 T. d
. As of 1999, the U.S. was said to have 12,000 nuclear weapons of all types stockpiled.
) Q# w& Q3 H1 a8 W1 \" C% O$ Z5.39.217.76
. In its Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) declaration for 2003, the U.S. listed 5968 deployed warheads as defined by START rules.
3 X7 X9 N; k. Y( C3 ` E' ^
. For 2007, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists listed the U.S. with about 5,400 total nuclear warheads: around 3,575 strategic and 500 nonstrategic warheads; and about 1,260 additional warheads held in the inactive stockpile. Other warheads are in some step of the disassembly process.
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb. u2 X6 E1 {& K
.The exact number as of Sept. 30, 2009, was 5,113 warheads, according to a U.S. fact sheet released May 3, 2010.
# J. `. W+ k1 @8 V" oTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。) P4 T4 H, F. A$ f- U8 V: s' s
! _ |) L: W% \% z# W4 ]TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。In 2010, the Pentagon disclosed that the current size of its nuclear arsenal is a total of 5,113 warheads operationally deployed, kept in active reserve and held in inactive storage. The figure does not include the estimated 4,600 warheads that have been retired and scheduled for dismantlement. The number of operationally deployed strategic warheads stands at 1,968作者: felicity2010 時間: 2011-11-11 10:35 AM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-11-11 10:44 AM 編輯 * c* O8 ?1 R; s
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 y2 m* D; c z' q8 e* }
The late Chalmers A. Johnson, a professor from the U of California, has written extensively on this subject: Blowback,Second Edition: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire; The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic; Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic. In these books, he describes America as an empire of bases, attempting to build it in the Roman model. The number of bases keeps on increasing despite the end of the Cold War. Its role has fallen out of strategic necessity, and explains part of the reason why there is an ever-increasing military expenses. " Q1 a( o% E% B( }0 W m9 S3 M8 t( lTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 1 Y7 X6 Q& D6 u9 o: mLike the bases in Okinawa, they were built on the best land in the island. There are constant conflicts between US servicemen and the local residents. The crimes committed by the US soldiers fall outside the jurisdiction of Japan and they would be put on trial in US military courts which frequently pass out very lenient sentences. 1 t; X0 Y+ }2 [" G+ a u9 r6 B5.39.217.76& C9 q5 o& G t Chalmers Johnson on American Hegemony 8 l4 g# b! \" C4 C5.39.217.765.39.217.769 s+ r: R7 P& R. y# L% n" A7 ^
Thank you felicity for your comment. It might appear that I am very against US, it is partly true, nearly all of their foreign policies are absolutely noxious. . [" a# g# c# A; w& k0 I, u( C公仔箱論壇On the other hand, many of my good friends are from the US; and I fully respect and admire those political intellectuals and artists who are living there.5.39.217.767 ^/ R! M* D. o5 c3 e% U/ c5 ^
One thing about the US: people are allowed to speak their mind openly without worrying too much of the subsequent consequence. 6 k- T! g$ x5 _: W$ l2 I7 R# f 7 C" d. @9 N" f9 Z F. ?& {公仔箱論壇Will spend some time to watch the clip again. Thanks.
+ `4 w& }; c; w7 x) h. T