2 E- ~0 X$ `- ]" I- e6 U5.39.217.76 5 y3 t/ Z. u# P: z; M
公仔箱論壇& v. d$ S9 ]9 I0 M. u Z
來源 / 版權所有:以上所述媒体 / 作者 $ n# F h0 Y( I$ h(以上内容摘自或摘译自 其它媒体 / 作者 ,不代表發帖者观点)作者: sbcc1980 時間: 2011-11-6 10:37 AM
人类不是一直在破坏自然规律吗,破坏一个就出来一个后果,难道非要让整个海洋变成死海。请那些资本家多为后人留下一点资本。作者: sbcc1980 時間: 2011-11-6 10:40 AM
人类一直在破坏大自然,自然也在报复人类,你我都看不到未来是什么,请为后人留下点资本,难道非要看一个死亡之海。作者: norman.ho 時間: 2011-11-6 10:59 AM
天然气输气管道会毁了波罗的海吗?
5.39.217.76- o' Q* d- B2 U: i4 K4 I
If yes, could someone tell me how and why? I care very much about our environment too, but I just can't see the risk here.9 J, w! C/ q+ P( R: a k1 N1 U- g
There are numerous undersea structures going under the sea and oceans, take the Euro tunnel, the various communication cables crossing the oceans, etc...公仔箱論壇# i/ g2 v8 y7 w
By the way, if there is any leak of at the gas tunnel, the gas can be easily switched off. 3 T {0 _% @2 c5.39.217.76And yes, gas power generation does generation greenhouse gas, but far less than coal fired power generator; and still remember the Japanese tsunami, the meltdown of the nuclear power generator? I rest my case. 作者: aa00 時間: 2011-11-6 12:59 PM
What I see here is 2 points: tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb; B- S z1 r! T8 h6 u0 a/ T- E
' F4 W4 A2 w3 a( uTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。1. 【俄罗斯的环保人士主要担心的是二战时期沉入波罗的海的化学武器是否会在天然气输气管线的修建过程中危害到环境安全。】 … Yes, it says … they have…. 【其中清除了大约80枚水雷。】 … but is this enough??? Completed???? tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb4 N# R2 p, @( f2 t2 d3 t
2. 【环保人士认为,尽管北溪公司采取了很多环保措施,但是波罗的海的生态系统还是会遭到破坏。】