Board logo

標題: 撞车的画面看起来好假 [打印本頁]
作者: latetx    時間: 2011-7-29 12:02 AM     標題: 撞车的画面看起来好假

大C撞车时好像切换成特效画面，不过看起来好假
作者: pinkpink23    時間: 2011-7-29 12:30 AM

当然是假，如果是真的那还得了。。。。
作者: 起司    時間: 2011-7-29 12:56 AM

当然是假，如果是真的那还得了。。。。3 M. J( T6 U) [' d
pinkpink23 發表於 29/7/2011 12:30 AM
/ }/ q, v3 z* N4 N绝对赞同( ]# r% m  S1 c( h+ f
就算他做到几真都好，我们都知道是假的啦，何必呢？
作者: wsndjlc    時間: 2011-7-29 10:42 AM

agree，當然是假的啦，如果是真的那還得了
作者: kenson    時間: 2011-7-29 12:45 PM

蒙面超人變身你唔話假？
作者: HD1080    時間: 2011-7-29 12:58 PM

绝对赞同
作者: even2010    時間: 2011-7-30 07:39 AM

假就对了，要是真的还了得啊
作者: x24779626    時間: 2011-7-30 01:51 PM

吾用特技搵個公仔做替身咩!?# a- M& T- v& Q' J; S
加上呢d冇得吾假
- O. b: {% S' r* D& ~tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb畀架車輾過喎@@!
作者: semisikog    時間: 2011-7-30 02:15 PM

当然是假，如果是真的那还得了。。。。
, E0 A) J9 ]2 i6 d4 N公仔箱論壇pinkpink23 發表於 2011-7-29 12:30 AM
赞同
作者: 小神    時間: 2011-7-30 03:41 PM

如果唔用这些剪接的特效镜头，绝对拍不出一撞即死的效果
作者: hoyin41414    時間: 2011-8-2 01:58 AM

好假!!!!!!!!!
作者: soccerforecasts    時間: 2011-8-2 07:10 AM

好假
作者: miniminidonut    時間: 2011-8-2 12:59 PM

looks good,...not bad.
作者: winstonlove    時間: 2011-8-2 11:11 PM

本帖最後由 winstonlove 於 2011-8-2 11:12 PM 編輯 公仔箱論壇0 Y- }- m! }" b# _; g

5 {/ Q3 y) C( W! v哎吔,個重点係話到比觀眾知大C撞车咪得囉,tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb4 r* @& u" E* l  v0 w, ~
並唔在於係咪用特技拍嘛,何況拍得幾真,都會知係假la
作者: whitedogdog1668    時間: 2011-8-2 11:26 PM

Of course fake one~~
作者: daizy    時間: 2011-8-3 03:15 AM

was alright i thought
作者: ttt_boy1    時間: 2011-8-3 11:33 AM

無線 做畫面特效的人都是好屎的人....
作者: fcity    時間: 2011-8-3 04:02 PM

so far so good la
作者: jojo8    時間: 2011-8-4 09:32 AM

this is call "movie" ... if real happen that is not movie ...
  g3 y0 E, E7 E: J* S' T$ P7 ITVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。further just want to tell you the accident happen only ...
- K, Q# \0 [- Q2 ?! T+ H3 A- FTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。maybe the cutting and animation is not so pro only ....
作者: huit    時間: 2011-8-4 01:41 PM

this is call "movie" ... if real happen that is not movie ... 5.39.217.76. M' ~2 W# J# f( k" F( H2 F
further just want to tell you the accident happen only ...
  j% o7 `; o( X8 X3 xmaybe the cutting and animation is not so pro only ....
1 w, D, r+ e% `5 v& z, {3 E5.39.217.76jojo8 發表於 2011-8-4 09:32 AM
5.39.217.76, e8 l" |0 g5 ?0 C  |* w

1 U1 R" M5 u% g# n# p( f3 Q公仔箱論壇Err... no,
  |; l' v  i# ~# L: _- b/ k. H5 i' ^
( v! w  n9 [- n" c. sIt's called "television" in case you couldn't tell them apart. 公仔箱論壇$ Y# L/ F) ~9 B2 A% W& l

9 L/ u4 j3 k2 Z! R) |; `  z7 q+ v"Movies" involve film, GENERALLY run for about 90-120 minutes give or take, and on first screening you'd normally need to pay to see them, and are not syndicated across tv networks and don't come in 25 episodes running for 5 consecutive weeks... ' B; Y2 ~; f8 v; ?* Z

" P6 V8 W. n9 b1 _; Z0 l5 BTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Good to learn something new eh? :P9 T6 `  z9 \9 U4 u7 s

& g0 m: B" C- S/ M' x  w, j/ C- GTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Seriously though - just because they've started using CGI doesn't mean it has to be less convincing. 15-20 years ago, they would've used a stunt double, a stunt driver and a scrap car from the junkyard (that's why you can always tell the main character is about to have a car crash when s/he gets into a shit car all of a sudden) - using CGI means you can use any car, there's no danger to the actor and there's no extra expense in hiring stuntmen, but that doesn't mean they can do a shit job at CGI
作者: tianmaoq    時間: 2011-8-4 01:55 PM

实际是假的，看上去逼真
作者: frfr511    時間: 2011-8-4 06:31 PM

reqwreeyter
作者: pppppp123    時間: 2011-8-4 11:02 PM

拍电视要成本的啊~
作者: rosses1213    時間: 2011-8-5 12:14 AM

..................



歡迎光臨 公仔箱論壇 (http://5.39.217.76/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0