公仔箱論壇 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 撞车的画面看起来好假 [打印本頁]

作者: latetx 時間: 2011-7-29 12:02 AM 標題: 撞车的画面看起来好假

大C撞车时好像切换成特效画面，不过看起来好假

作者: pinkpink23 時間: 2011-7-29 12:30 AM

当然是假，如果是真的那还得了。。。。

作者: 起司 時間: 2011-7-29 12:56 AM

当然是假，如果是真的那还得了。。。。
, N" n0 g! N/ i S$ P5 [- vpinkpink23 發表於 29/7/2011 12:30 AM

绝对赞同

就算他做到几真都好，我们都知道是假的啦，何必呢？

作者: wsndjlc 時間: 2011-7-29 10:42 AM

agree，當然是假的啦，如果是真的那還得了

作者: kenson 時間: 2011-7-29 12:45 PM

蒙面超人變身你唔話假？

作者: HD1080 時間: 2011-7-29 12:58 PM

绝对赞同

作者: even2010 時間: 2011-7-30 07:39 AM

假就对了，要是真的还了得啊

作者: x24779626 時間: 2011-7-30 01:51 PM

吾用特技搵個公仔做替身咩!?
加上呢d冇得吾假
畀架車輾過喎@@!

作者: semisikog 時間: 2011-7-30 02:15 PM

当然是假，如果是真的那还得了。。。。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb$ t% V6 w6 s8 g
pinkpink23 發表於 2011-7-29 12:30 AM

赞同

作者: 小神 時間: 2011-7-30 03:41 PM

如果唔用这些剪接的特效镜头，绝对拍不出一撞即死的效果

作者: hoyin41414 時間: 2011-8-2 01:58 AM

好假!!!!!!!!!

作者: soccerforecasts 時間: 2011-8-2 07:10 AM

好假

作者: miniminidonut 時間: 2011-8-2 12:59 PM

looks good,...not bad.

作者: winstonlove 時間: 2011-8-2 11:11 PM

本帖最後由 winstonlove 於 2011-8-2 11:12 PM 編輯
5.39.217.76* r$ k2 {1 x4 k/ n
哎吔,個重点係話到比觀眾知大C撞车咪得囉,
並唔在於係咪用特技拍嘛,何況拍得幾真,都會知係假la

作者: whitedogdog1668 時間: 2011-8-2 11:26 PM

Of course fake one~~

作者: daizy 時間: 2011-8-3 03:15 AM

was alright i thought

作者: ttt_boy1 時間: 2011-8-3 11:33 AM

無線做畫面特效的人都是好屎的人....

作者: fcity 時間: 2011-8-3 04:02 PM

so far so good la

作者: jojo8 時間: 2011-8-4 09:32 AM

this is call "movie" ... if real happen that is not movie ...
further just want to tell you the accident happen only ... : W9 Z& a* M0 F# O" ~, ~
maybe the cutting and animation is not so pro only ....

作者: huit 時間: 2011-8-4 01:41 PM

this is call "movie" ... if real happen that is not movie ... tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb+ y. c' G* ]$ Z/ v1 k0 M
further just want to tell you the accident happen only ... ) K p, `9 O0 i/ q* @8 k# |
maybe the cutting and animation is not so pro only ....
) _: @& {4 M5 Y5 ^jojo8 發表於 2011-8-4 09:32 AM

6 y6 O7 y f9 i1 }
; B% S" @! K4 V0 T1 ~
Err... no,
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb6 a; k# d& o+ |+ H8 i' d* J0 ]. r
It's called "television" in case you couldn't tell them apart. : r* H3 ?* E2 o3 }" @2 X( D* f

"Movies" involve film, GENERALLY run for about 90-120 minutes give or take, and on first screening you'd normally need to pay to see them, and are not syndicated across tv networks and don't come in 25 episodes running for 5 consecutive weeks...

Good to learn something new eh? :P公仔箱論壇. q& k' ]5 |! e) \* s: q# I

Seriously though - just because they've started using CGI doesn't mean it has to be less convincing. 15-20 years ago, they would've used a stunt double, a stunt driver and a scrap car from the junkyard (that's why you can always tell the main character is about to have a car crash when s/he gets into a shit car all of a sudden) - using CGI means you can use any car, there's no danger to the actor and there's no extra expense in hiring stuntmen, but that doesn't mean they can do a shit job at CGI

作者: tianmaoq 時間: 2011-8-4 01:55 PM

实际是假的，看上去逼真

作者: frfr511 時間: 2011-8-4 06:31 PM

reqwreeyter

作者: pppppp123 時間: 2011-8-4 11:02 PM

拍电视要成本的啊~

作者: rosses1213 時間: 2011-8-5 12:14 AM

..................

歡迎光臨公仔箱論壇 (http://5.39.217.76/)