, W/ B. h. w8 g! U" v- _. aTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。《世新》停刊，因「竊聽」而起，然而，「竊聽」是新聞界行之有年的「採訪」技巧。「竊聽」本為間諜特工的「專用伎倆」，但早為劇烈競爭為「獨家新聞」拚個你死我活的傳媒所採用﹔「新聞工作者」是「斯文人」，不屑亦不嫻熟這種下三流的勾當，因此多請「線人」或私家偵探進行，行不通則設法賄賂相關官員……。近的不說（事實筆者亦因沒興趣而不了解），以遙遠的英國為例，十多年前大家看得津津有味的黛安娜王妃與馬術教練（？）情人電話中互訴「奸」情、查爾斯王子與「老」情人卡米拉（Camilla，今王妃）的綿綿（肉麻之極）「性」話，所以完完整整刊諸報端，便是「竊聽者之功」。可是，當年有誰會想起要追究責任，以這些社會寄生虫做「秀」娛樂人民，是他們的本份。但《世新》的觸須伸得太遠，「竊聽」大眾同情、景仰的人，而且刪除內容，令事件惡化，傷害當事人，因此罪無可赦！8 a4 C8 W0 W$ B( ?" H3 P1 W1 V
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。$ i- T% J8 J. L& h% q# S& h
《世界新聞報》竊聽案是新聞集團從高峰下墜的轉折點。 3 L+ G4 i. }/ S! ^7 f# m1 V% o 7 p) k) W5 a! I* g＊一向以來，人們以Tabloid形容「黃色報刊」，這是因為這類報刊大都以小張（十一吋乘十七吋）形式出之﹔近年為「方便閱讀」（尤其是在公共交通工具上展讀），不少所謂「知識分子大報」（highbrow newspaper）如《華爾街日報》已改為Tabloid大小出版，這等於說Tabloid和Broadsheet（十七吋乘二十二吋）隻有體積大小之分，與內容質量無關。本報是典型例子，《信報》是Broadsheet，隨報附送的英文EJ Insight是淺綠色的Tabloid，它沒有文化副刊、娛樂新聞，比《信報》還嚴肅（high brow），因此絕不能因其為Tabloid而稱之為「小報」﹔同理，若《信報》改為小張出版，只要內容不變，便不能稱為「小報」。按上引Tabloid和Broadsheet的呎碼，是美國的量度標准，實際上各地因新聞紙（Newsprint）的呎吋不同而略有分別。作者: felicity2010 時間: 2011-7-12 12:19 PM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-7-12 12:25 PM 編輯 / \4 O' n# I/ [$ f5.39.217.76公仔箱論壇. Z' V1 p5 `' l8 ?! w7 n6 p This media is corrupt – we need a Hippocratic oath for journalists * n; C- i3 ^6 M* f) n. |+ ~TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 George Monbiot The Guardian公仔箱論壇2 ?/ X: ]0 R( Z1 Z b: }
公仔箱論壇/ i8 H1 V8 E4 j. _) H& G# M
Is Murdoch now finished in the UK? As the pursuit of Gordon Brown by the Sunday Times and the Sun blows the hacking scandal into new corners of the old man's empire, this story begins to feel like the crumbling of the Berlin Wall. The naked attempt to destroy Brown by any means, including hacking the medical files of his sick baby son, means that there is no obvious limit to the story's ramifications. ; ]3 A5 Y. M, `公仔箱論壇% ~7 W9 M$ s) ^9 [ M, ^8 C, w
The scandal radically changes public perceptions of how politics works,the danger corporate power presents to democracy, and the extent to which it has compromised and corrupted the Metropolitan police, who have now been dragged in so deep they are beginning to look like Murdoch's private army. It has electrified a dozy parliament and subjected the least accountable and most corrupt profession in Britain –journalism – to belated public scrutiny.3 y% H A( ~6 T4 _/ V3 t' q
* n4 b2 ^/ o, X! y) F& X( j+ r6 \
The cracks are appearing in the most unexpected places. Look at the remarkable admission by the right wing columnist Janet Daley in this week's Sunday Telegraph. "British political journalism is basically a club to which politicians and journalists both belong," she wrote. "It is this familiarity, this intimacy, this set of shared assumptions … which is the real corruptor of political life. The self-limiting spectrum of what can and cannot be said … the self-reinforcing cowardice which takes for granted that certain vested interests are too powerful to be worth confronting. All of these things are constant dangers in the political life of any democracy."5.39.217.76, A. |( i0 K0 T, \
3 W% m9 s2 E% V0 q1 n7 K! U公仔箱論壇Most national journalists are embedded, immersed in the society, beliefs and culture of the people they are meant to hold to account. They are fascinated by power struggles among the elite but have little interest in the conflict between the elite and those they dominate. They celebrate those with agency and ignore those without.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb) u1 U" J# y0 B6 u
公仔箱論壇 T& S$ K2 ^8 J
But this is just part of the problem. Daley stopped short of naming the most persuasive force: the interests of the owner and the corporate class to which he belongs. The proprietor appoints editors in his own image – who impress their views on their staff. Murdoch's editors, like those who work for the other proprietors, insist that they think and act independently. 2 I ~4 [9 `: s5 \8 mTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。2 `, i' w" J2 a; u' y$ A
It's a lie exposed by the concurrence of their views (did all 247 News Corp editors just happen to support the invasion of Iraq?), and blown out of the water by Andrew Neil's explosive testimony in 2008 before the Lords select committee on communications.公仔箱論壇! |0 J, N1 r; m6 r% E
5.39.217.76& k8 M& y4 O! O
The papers cannot announce that their purpose is to ventriloquise the concerns of multimillionaires; they must present themselves as the voice of the people. The Sun, the Mail and the Express claim to represent the interests of the working man and woman. These interests turn out to be identical to those of the men who own the papers.公仔箱論壇7 ^$ O2 B, M+ h( q5 a
" W \! \: _4 Q+ b5.39.217.76So the right wing papers run endless exposures of benefit cheats, yet say scarcely a word about the corporate tax cheats. They savage the trade unions and excoriate the BBC. They lambast the regulations that restrain corporate power. They school us in the extrinsic values – the worship of power, money,image and fame – which advertisers love but which make this a shallower, more selfish country. Most of them deceive their readers about the causes of climate change. These are not the obsessions of working people. They are the obsessions thrust upon them by the multimillionaires who own these papers. - Y) S f' V# r ! U. p2 b0 `& S* B3 {& x公仔箱論壇The corporate media is a gigantic astroturfing operation: a fake grassroots crusade serving elite interests. In this respect the media companies resemble the Tea Party movement, which claims to be a spontaneous rising of blue-collar Americans against the elite but was founded with the help of the billionaire Koch brothers and promoted by Murdoch's Fox News.$ t! ]5 K' N* ?% A: a
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。- k. K; j; e, L' ]; K
Journalism's primary purpose is to hold power to account. This purpose has been perfectly inverted. Columnists and bloggers are employed as the enforcers of corporate power, denouncing people who criticise its interests,stamping on new ideas, bullying the powerless. The press barons allowed governments occasionally to promote the interests of the poor, but never to hamper the interests of the rich. They also sought to discipline the rest of the media. The BBC, over the last 30 years, became a shadow of the gutsy broadcaster it was, and now treats big business with cringing deference. Every morning at 6.15, the Today programme's business report grants executives the kind of unchallenged access otherwise reserved for God on Thought for the Day.The rest of the programme seeks out controversy and sets up discussions between opponents, but these people are not confronted by their critics. 5 S! L- O$ U/ `tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。3 k' C/ h- M2 {& \5 u2 Y" N
So what can be done? Because of the peculiar threat they present to democracy there's a case to be made for breaking up all majority interests in media companies, and for a board of governors, appointed perhaps by Commons committee, to act as a counterweight to the shareholders' business interests.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。6 T$ m8 \4 D& w* F8 F/ o" h
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb0 Y' A# m" E0 x
But even if that's a workable idea, it's a long way off. For now, the best hope might be to mobilise readers to demand that journalists answer to them, not just their proprietors. One means of doing this is to lobby journalists to commit themselves to a kind of Hippocratic oath. Here's a rough stab at a first draft. I hope others can improve it. Ideally, I'd like to see the National Union of Journalists building on it and encouraging its members to sign.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb& y* L+ x! {- P# Z! W: E
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。6 p& R5 W- d; ?; z+ e! S) W
'Our primary task is to hold power to account. We will prioritise those stories and issues which expose the interests of power. We will be wary of the relationships we form with the rich and powerful, and ensure that we don't become embedded in their society. We will not curry favour with politicians,businesses or other dominant groups by withholding scrutiny of their affairs,or twisting a story to suit their interests.0 @) \9 T' X. v# k
b5 K) x; K- m: P5 d5 u"We will stand up to the interests of the businesses we work for,and the advertisers which fund them. We will never take money for promulgating a particular opinion, and we will resist attempts to oblige us to adopt one.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb5 A. o8 {% ~& k5 y
% M I& H+ o/ w; Z% j0 [公仔箱論壇"We will recognise and understand the power we wield and how it originates. We will challenge ourselves and our perception of the world as much as we challenge other people. When we turn out to be wrong, we will say so." / Z! g# z, T4 U' }( ?公仔箱論壇TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。7 |' h7 X- V4 h+ G, Q% ~9 X( g6 _
I accept that this doesn't directly address the power relations that govern the papers. But it might help journalists to assert a measure of independence, and readers to hold them to it. Just as voters should lobby their MPs to represent them and not just the whips, readers should seek to drag journalists away from the demands of their editors. The oath is one possibletool that could enhance reader power.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。: w# `: i! W. j% ~
5.39.217.76/ Q$ x; _8 o0 H0 y2 D+ A5 _+ Z
If you don't like it, suggest a better idea. Something has to change:never again should a half a dozen oligarchs be allowed to dominate and corrupt the life of this country.作者: aa00 時間: 2011-7-12 06:51 PM
新聞自由 ≠ 免死金牌 + C; e+ x7 q1 S5 htvb now,tvbnow,bttvb TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。; \! r& x. f; u, K4 C! R$ g
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。, ^1 [/ H6 B( o& [" t
「5W1H」是選修媒體研究課程，第一天上課講師在第一堂課就告訴學生們，一則新聞內容所包含的最基本元素。! p; \6 f- l' {
, E$ v5 d2 Y7 D9 f7 j# y6 i
這5W分別代表了Who,What,When,Where,Why, H則是How。媒體工作者的責任之一就是要將一件新聞事件，當中所涉及的人物，發生了什麼事，時間和地點，以及原因和它是如何發生的，清楚明白的告訴讀者和觀眾。 $ E) ~1 B. C( d7 t+ X' i- ? , ] `+ P8 {2 R4 H w; ~tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb在課堂上，講師也告訴學生們，媒體被稱為「無冕之王」，是行政、立法、司法三權外的第四權。所以，媒體的責任亦包括監督政府，用以制衡前三者，避濫權與偏誤的發生。 $ Q& L' N- t3 W9 r6 r: o公仔箱論壇 $ @* \7 L8 w( V# S6 O3 E這時候，講師拋出了個問題「你的受訪者願意接受採訪，對方要求你不能錄音，但是你又要保護你自己，你該怎麼做？」 0 M) s' a& N# ^5 O) itvb now,tvbnow,bttvb 5.39.217.76* d$ s- c4 C5 F# s+ V
課堂上，各種答案都有，甲說：「現場要有第3人在場」；乙說：「尊重受訪者的意願」；丙說：「採訪過程中，我先錄音，不讓受訪者知道。但事後會告訴對方。」公仔箱論壇+ }* u8 G' {. T
5.39.217.769 t! c: s' y4 q6 y0 K; ^4 }- m) e
擁168年歷史的英國小報《世界新聞報》在7月10日出版最後一期，之後正式宣告結業。原因就在於報社記者和高層逾越了身為媒體工作者該有的規範，被揭發徵聘私家偵探竊聽公眾的手機，甚至被揭賄賂員警以獲得內幕消息。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。- Y: G/ E, W! c& W3 y# S/ f7 f
0 |: y+ R$ r( Itvb now,tvbnow,bttvb曾幾何時，被視為維護公眾權益、揭發名人濫權（花邊）醜聞、受人尊敬的第四權，淪落成過街老鼠，《世界新聞報》成了全英國人的公敵，人人喊打。 : `. j2 { }- X C0 x2 Y9 HTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 + O. H7 o6 @4 }4 C2 I+ \, L
而且，一粒老鼠屎壞了一鍋粥，因為前人和一些高層違反了新聞守則，結果要全報社的200多名員工因報社關閉而失業，被迫共同承擔不是他們犯下的罪行。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb6 V: \) D/ Y. _1 K1 w
: P, T) |! C5 n9 \: ?, yBildunterschrift: 英国警方已经开始全面调查《世界新闻报》的窃听丑闻3 q% w. |% \+ y: [& u) g
9 s# l1 F& A+ {英国政界重新反思政治与媒体的关系 " c' @, t J' STVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 ; |' }0 k2 j. c+ z; ]- ?2 Y6 A5.39.217.76 tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb6 ?1 a# j F" ]# ~
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb6 Y; P% U4 `4 X4 \* U
卡梅伦知道，曝光的窃听丑闻已经为英国政坛的形象带来了许多负面性的影响。许多人严厉抨击英国政坛和媒体的暧昧关系。议会中的一位普通议员说："整个事情中最令人感到不安的就是政客和媒体从业者的暧昧关系。" 6 M1 q: i/ O1 E公仔箱論壇这位议员用历史提醒人们，前首相布莱尔（Tony Blair）在执政期间就已经将政界与媒体的合作推向极致。因为"自从托尼·布莱尔于90年代飞往澳大利亚拜访默多克开始，各党派的领导人就认为有必要与媒体大亨们搞好关系。现在的问题是，未来的党派领导人是否还认为有必要出席这些人的生日宴会，他们是否能与这些媒体企业家保持距离。究竟是这个国家的公共利益还是媒体集团的利益能够占上风。" / R2 `$ O V0 x公仔箱論壇英国首相卡梅伦承认， 媒体和政治的关系已经开始朝着错误的方向发展："两者相互的关系确实已经不太正常，这种关系越来越近。人们已经用了太多的时间在媒体上宣传自己，从而没有时间去真正的解决问题。" u9 A# C3 A' n+ E1 x( m
但是卡梅伦强调：媒体和政治相互依存的关系将仍然存在。"我们不会一下子都跑到修道院里面（面壁思过），我们需要一种关系，政客在此能够尝试让媒体接受他们自己的观点。我们的义务也包括向公众解释，我们究竟想为这个国家做些什么。民主的意义在于：在解释的过程中执行权利。为此，我们需要媒体的支持。"TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。8 i( u B% ^+ k: Z9 e
因此，莱韦森法官的任务不仅仅是要查出窃听丑闻的规模和背后的指使者。 他还应该为重新定位媒体与政治的关系提供建议。无论如何，默多克帝国已经失去了英国市场的份额：新闻集团仍仅持有BskyB39%的股份，而《世界新闻报》已经不复存在。 . O# Y3 }: L* W" B6 q" G5.39.217.76作者：Sebastian Hesse 编译:任琛TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。4 M F: Y; B- v0 T, q
责编:石涛5.39.217.76: R2 J& N5 g f) e3 a
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb, S7 r% y+ W, u1 E+ ~% v& B2 K0 p
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。& e# p N7 t0 x
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb& `0 N; B/ b, T% g* J* o3 L. O
6 c8 m+ @% y8 j) y) ~5.39.217.76 公仔箱論壇! C) }; Z! b9 c
$ G. c S4 p2 {: U6 O0 I$ B( u5.39.217.76來源 / 版權所有： 德国之声 ; @, O. Q1 d6 e' L A0 v: [TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。(以上内容摘自或摘译自 德国之声，不代表發帖者观点)作者: felicity2010 時間: 2011-7-14 11:08 PM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-7-14 11:17 PM 編輯 : p# `( ^. N5 u+ u' M5 S5 c% Ntvb now,tvbnow,bttvb9 g& H/ S# v4 e8 ~/ X) |) O& X' M News International scandal: The sky falls in tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb, D' G9 Z( j2 j! A8 Q The Guardian 13 July 2011 # r. c% j& |: i3 W9 |. ]公仔箱論壇tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb/ M8 ^* E, ?$ H: h& ^' v* }$ _
[attach]1426755[/attach] & v6 A) K" s8 o3 ]) I+ b: x - u8 s4 Z! m1 b* B. d$ Btvb now,tvbnow,bttvbIt is a measure of how much has been achieved in this revolutionary week that by the time David Cameron set out details of the inquiry into media and police standards on Wednesday lunchtime, and News Corporation announced it was dropping its bid for BSkyB soon after, both things seemed natural and unavoidable. A wave of public and political contempt is reshaping the landscape. At the start of the month no senior politician dared defy Rupert Murdoch. Now, all of them have. Party leaders united around the terms of the inquiry and the Labour-sponsored Commons debate – itself presaged by the collapse of the deal it had been arranged to condemn.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb; E! `) k, x# y
( G/ n8 J" N8 [ x) ZYesterday Wednesday brought a drama in four acts. At prime minister's questions Mr Cameron sought unsuccessfully to rid himself of the taint of proximity to the News International executives who oversaw phone hacking, of which more in a moment. In his Commons statement, the prime minister set out the terms of an inquiry into media standards of extraordinary scope and potential. By mid-afternoon, News Corporation pulled the plug on the BSkyB deal: a victory for plurality over the power of a rootless corporation. In particular it was a success for Ed Miliband, whose decision to break with News International has become the definitive act of his leadership so far. Finally, Gordon Brown delivered a powerful speech whose justified moral outrage was only equalled by its divisive consequences in the chamber.5.39.217.76: M) |. y+ e6 i: r8 l% J" _
5.39.217.76' F% R+ j5 f7 K, M7 B
Mr. Brown presented himself in retrospect as a white knight who stood up to the Murdoch empire, only to be let down by the timidity of others. Not everything at the time was like that. The Brown government was far from pure in its dealings with the press. But the former prime minister was on firmer ground when he questioned Mr. Cameron's record. The prime minister's response raised further significant questions about his slapdash approach to phone hacking and the appointment of Andy Coulson as his media adviser.6 F, K" J# e( l5 O( @
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。: [5 @: K, I6 Z. z4 D* Q# p
In February 2010, this paper ran a story which should have given Mr Cameron pause for thought. For legal reasons it contained only limited details of the News of the World's decision, while Mr. Coulson was editor, to employ a private investigator who had served a seven-year sentence for perverting the course of justice and who had been charged with conspiracy to murder. Believing that Mr. Cameron should be made aware in private of the full details, the Guardian passed them to his senior adviser, Steve Hilton.' ?* j: k3 V! P2 \
% Z# s0 F' Y; f6 d' }* [6 @tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbIn the Commons, however, Mr. Cameron told MPs that the Guardian passed no significant private information about Mr. Coulson to his staff. That is incorrect. Second, he suggested that the Guardian had been able to put all the significant facts of the story in the public domain at the time. That is incorrect, too. Third, he claimed that the fact that the editor of the Guardian, Alan Rusbridger, did not mention the story to him at two later meetings implied it was not important. That is an evasion: the first meeting followed the private warning and the second took place after Mr. Coulson had resigned. Mr Cameron could have been in full possession of the facts, and acted on them, had he chosen to be. Instead he gave Mr. Coulson a job in Downing Street. - l' Z/ o, U4 }5.39.217.765.39.217.76: c1 ~: }# L/ M- ^0 Y O9 [4 e, N
This matters because at the core of the whole affair lies the shoddy and secret way in which some powerful media groups have dealt with political leaders from both main parties. In this, Mr. Cameron may not even be the greatest sinner. But he happens to be the prime minister who must address all what has gone on. He cannot do so properly while he continues to evade the truth of his own past dealings.The world is changing. Mr Murdoch's spell has been broken. The BSkyB deal is off. The inquiry can lead to a cleaner, more plural, future. Mr. Cameron is trapped by his past.
Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift: 美国新闻集团总裁默多克
Bildunterschrift: 英国警方已经开始全面调查《世界新闻报》的窃听丑闻3 q% w. |% \+ y: [& u) g