本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-7-4 07:49 AM 編輯 公仔箱論壇2 I$ h5 Q+ T' W; c+ u1 f
8 K3 ?; f/ T6 d5 i5.39.217.76季辛吉新著遭譏評 陸以正9 o$ k9 k0 F" o. b
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。0 J# U: u) P+ X6 f
公仔箱論壇: _. j0 f; |! Z4 ^
[attach]1416907[/attach] * }2 L$ l; D( k* g0 V+ e+ ]tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb 7 D u) P+ {$ y5.39.217.76TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。+ ] V. H& Q6 r8 y; c" @$ ]/ T
& Y( Q7 O5 A+ R2 u5.39.217.76人人都知道，曾任白宮國家安全顧問，後來做到美國國務卿的季辛吉，是打破美中僵持三十餘年關係的功臣。一九七一年他先到巴基斯坦，假稱肚子痛，卻溜到大陸去見毛澤東和周恩來，到今天已經四十年。他在德國出生，依照美國憲法，沒資格當總統，但可謂一人之下，萬人之上，也該滿足了。 ( O, Z; O; N1 q$ t/ K: L( G. {TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。5 O$ \6 G9 `* k; p. u: Z, o5 f
今日回顧，相隔四十年後，兩國領導人後浪推前浪，各自也更換過六、七次。在美國，賞識季辛吉的尼克森，因水門案風波下台。此後歷經福特、卡特、雷根、老布希、柯林頓、小布希、到今天的歐巴馬，經過了七位總統。時移境遷，今天美國負債累累，已非當年傲視全球的「美帝」可比了。& O: D1 a2 l V& p
8 _, _( F% x. i' ^
同樣地，中國大陸亦幾度你上我下，無復舊日面貌。即使不把「四人幫」算進去，歷經毛澤東、劉少奇、宋慶齡（很多人忘記她確曾擔任過「中華人民共和國主席」，儘管只是虛銜）、董必武、李先念、楊尚昆、江澤民、到今天的胡錦濤，也換過八位。真可謂物是人非。今年恰巧是季辛吉初次去大陸的四十周年，他自然不肯放過自吹自擂的機會。公仔箱論壇2 T5 C/ L/ [4 ]+ o. V2 m
% L9 A4 f7 H! s" m9 E+ o4 k" B
美中兩國都歷經滄桑，唯有季辛吉老著臉皮，每年都去大陸訪問。只要有人邀請，不管生張熟魏，有請必到，四十年來總共超過五十次之多。所以他最近出版的著作，書名只有兩個字，就叫《On China》，可譯為《論中國》。全書五百八十六頁，精裝本定價美金卅六元。內行人可上Amazon.com書店網站，大約半價就能買到了。 , X/ W& N2 [. V, y % }& R, v1 e0 Y6 x1 a+ |( ?1 _. g! e本書五月十五日發行，至今才一個多月。以台灣出版界競爭之劇烈，腦筋動得快的書店，相信已在找企鵝書屋（Penguin Books）剛出版的原書。甚至把它撕成幾塊找幾名翻譯匠趕工，同時與出版商交涉授權，中譯本可能很快就會問世。 q5 n4 V/ i- J2 }# L
7 e0 |6 X$ V4 J4 V N' G+ l
我是在《紐約時報》周末版書評副刊上，讀到該報名記者佛蘭克爾（Max Frankel）執筆的書評。他做過《紐約時報》的星期日版主編、社論版主編和執行總編輯。一九七二年尼克森去大陸的破冰之旅，報館就是派他隨行採訪的，因而得到普立茲新聞獎（Pulitzer Prize）。佛蘭克爾現在也八十一歲了，季辛吉的《論中國》，由他來寫書評，可謂不做第二人想。' B& b0 _; t2 A6 y) C
7 V6 q6 O. [; h. N; d( A
1 e( k1 }$ V2 ~% e8 u
別說佛蘭克爾，季辛吉生於一九二三年，現在也八十八歲了。他雖然因此得到諾貝爾和平獎，台灣所有認同中華民國的人，對他難免心懷不滿。但佛蘭克爾倒說了幾句公道話。他指出：季辛吉的長處，在於能整理出一套自成體系的「戰略觀念（strategic concepts）」，抓住問題重點，而把兩造歷史悠久的衝突、仇恨與恐懼暫時放在一邊。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。5 L/ g5 e) t N. O1 j
' t, i$ V* |) R7 B$ l6 U Jtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb佛蘭克爾指出：一九七二年時，大陸人對美國有很大的反感，不只因為美國曾以武力干涉國共鬥爭，而且非常討厭美國整天擺出一副優越的模樣，批評中國不准許民主自由、不尊重個人權利與不容許宗教信仰等等。但季辛吉偏能在兩國外交政策的眾多矛盾中，找出雙方和則兩蒙其利，分則兩敗俱傷的路｜就是前蘇聯對美、中兩國的威脅。 * q4 q# P" u& S. m. D& xTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 ; e! [$ k6 L( e; A! T! @6 |: d( Y% ?tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb 1 S% w/ t# z. t0 q4 t公仔箱論壇季辛吉的戰略觀念，用書中他自己的話，就是「中、美兩國不管什麼人執政，遲早必然會結合在一起，只是時間問題。（That China and the United States would find a way to come together was inevitable given the necessities of the time.）」。但這句話會是顛撲不破的真理嗎？佛蘭克爾評論老季新書的重點，正在於此。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb/ L: G" _" Q+ |2 b' A5 H
9 i" a5 K* \, X$ }5.39.217.76季辛吉對大陸的胡溫體制推崇備至，他說今日中國一切以經濟為先，既無意於對外擴張，也願意耐心等候與台灣和平統一。北京只想全力振興經濟，提高全國人民的生活水準。佛蘭克爾忍不住調侃老季說，你不是一直認為從戰略觀點看，民主只是一種累贅嗎？ & ]- F! H, j! |' a0 X公仔箱論壇 " n; Q% z' E* q0 D4 \5.39.217.76老季確實這麼說過：所謂民主，在國際一盤棋裡，無足輕重。上周三即六月廿八日，他又到了北京，習近平接見他。我猜測他不會向大陸內定的接班人，講這類喪氣話。 A1 g9 j6 p2 X3 O; k + B: j1 F7 i! y# @9 }$ \公仔箱論壇) R; S" x& l7 u
Kissinger has a dark side that in a way undermines his credibility as a politician. For those who are interested, there is a good documentary called "Trials of Henry Kissinger" on this facet of his character. 8 v4 @8 I/ X4 _+ }" g8 j) u * _4 [, b4 a" B; e/ gTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。[gv]-2815881561030958784[/gv]1 L+ E2 J4 w( a$ Y# Q) ]% p
As in the video, someone said “He’s a world criminal.” ) {& N( K( g B4 i* L. Xtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbThe New York Times (Washington; Dec. 1, 1998) stated that … doubts about international tribunals aimed at former foreign rulers, and worries over the implications for American leaders who might some-day also accused in foreign countries.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb" z2 F5 `: Q& t: r3 x8 R, W% n8 H# x
Geoffrey Robertson QC, Human Rights Lawyer, said … they may be punished sometime in the future???公仔箱論壇% i$ m$ Z! M+ l. ]" m# p/ h8 _
7 t+ {$ p o3 e/ [% l; k( J0 C, [9 q1 O5.39.217.76Would you believe that? Will it be? Can it be?? 5.39.217.76+ g: K: Z+ b% T4 j; @2 g [
I doubt !作者: felicity2010 時間: 2011-7-5 01:40 AM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-7-5 01:44 AM 編輯 公仔箱論壇- }; y9 t; ~" b1 ?/ L( H. a
7 X& p" _0 E0 f# F( O) T3 rI believe his day of reckoning probably would not be in his life time. There are still many documents to be declassified before there is solid evidence to proceed with the indictment, if any. American public are quite naive and gullible, eager to believe whatever said by their politicians. Like Reagan whose hands were dripping with innocent blood, still is one of the most popular presidents. Dissident voices are few in the American media and have low chance of being heard. I still vividly remember the popular support enjoyed by George W Bush when he prepared the invasion of Iraq. Although there were a few who questioned the justification for the war, it remained a hardly noticeable minority.作者: aa00 時間: 2011-7-6 12:10 PM
At this point, I can't see any difference between USA & China ……… high hand (sorry to use Chinglish as more familiar ) to hide.作者: felicity2010 時間: 2011-7-6 01:51 PM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-7-7 01:34 PM 編輯 " ?9 P6 Y6 G( x2 P4 o5 O公仔箱論壇tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% s: U4 B7 i) [+ |: g$ Q# a8 w
Although it looks the same, there are actually differences. There are system in place to declassify documents after a time, usually 25 years in US. The parties having interests in the documents can extend the time before declassification. However, individuals or organizations can apply for the declassification through Mandatory Declassification Review or for Freedom of Information Act. A decision would be made by higher authority. Of course, there are ways to get around this like partially revealing the documents and yet keeping the names and dates or other sensitive data hidden but it is still within the confines of the law. The Chinese government can put a lid on scandals using heavy-handed means like imprisonment based on trumped-up charges or direct threats, oblivion of the rule of law.
5.39.217.76+ g: K: Z+ b% T4 j; @2 g [