yea. i was disappointed at that part too 6 K7 r6 [+ _# ]how can it be an accident?+ O' H: |% |6 h1 Z1 `8 f$ P0 ~6 H1 O; ?
that piece of glass was accerlated so strongly that it can kill?公仔箱論壇4 x8 R4 g; a* @/ O* n, f! Z: I4 Z
even Kevin's experiment failed作者: cheerful12 時間: 2011-6-16 12:10 PM
yea. i was disappointed at that part too: G* {+ p/ g2 k* m! |# G
how can it be an accident? 8 R1 L L8 B W9 t; X! s: J公仔箱論壇that piece of glass was accerlated so strongly that it can kill?公仔箱論壇2 R/ f( y" f7 Q$ {# u$ L! j+ z8 g
even Kevin's experiment failed作者: justinsong 時間: 2011-6-16 04:06 PM
呢度剧本唔通作者: edwinhiht 時間: 2011-6-18 01:02 AM
聽古唔好駁古..但我都頂唔住, 咁都作得出,跌落街都易合理d啦作者: buzz21 時間: 2011-6-18 01:04 AM
唉....故仔真係故仔... 咩都由佢講作者: bbtang47 時間: 2011-6-18 01:43 AM
everyone here is very pro..作者: ava7 時間: 2011-6-24 08:36 PM
yes..i dont agree that作者: lightpink 時間: 2011-6-24 09:04 PM
係咯,係咯作者: mrfusion 時間: 2011-6-24 10:11 PM
for the glass fragment to strike her, the glass has to be smash at a precise speed and precise angle with a precise orientation, and possibly if the glass has any pre-existing defect. 公仔箱論壇# l+ ~# Y$ u8 B% ~* C' G1 {/ N
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb3 v8 I \; n$ Y
the possibiolity is endless which will make it impossible to repeat the experiment.