2 [1 m- u) b+ O I公仔箱論壇美國一日宣布基地恐怖組織領導人賓拉登，已經在巴基斯坦首都近郊，被特種部隊擊斃，消息傳出，美國街頭群眾歡欣鼓舞，前總統布希更聲稱，正義得以伸張。4 l T' V. q8 x6 p; a
5.39.217.760 \+ I" `: O" g) L S1 c/ S
賓拉登的死是罪有應得，但是他的死，並不代表問題的結束，反而可能揭開了一盆毒蛇的蓋子；然而這也意味著，美國政策如果改弦更張，或許可趁機消解宗教世仇，開創新局。$ m) o7 j! T' R2 k
1 [, l, X# J% o7 e
過去基地恐怖組織的領導人是賓拉登，無論是金錢、武器與訓練，都有嚴格的由上至下的組織體系，聯軍打入阿富汗後，基地組織被打散，賓拉登轉型變成意識形態的領袖，三不五時在網路上發表反美言論，鼓吹繼續聖戰。0 B/ G' z4 _9 c
1 K! |, C) p) g$ j# xTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。除掉賓拉登，並不能夠消滅反對美國的組織，反而把它們打散，一個細胞與一個細胞，在各國滋生分裂，不待號令發動報復攻擊。也就是因為如此，歐美各國紛紛把警戒層次提升到最高，警告僑民躲開人多的地方，搭乘飛機、火車，風險自負，更有傳言，基地組織在歐洲持有若干核彈，伺機引爆。 " w; {% J. r' D, S: i! C- d ) F* K8 L' k) h# _3 r2 i" mTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。賓拉登的死，短時間造成危機升高，但長期是否會激化目前的伊斯蘭教組織，也有待觀察。老實說，北非革命風潮，並不是由基地組織發起的，而是穆斯林兄弟會與薩拉非激進組織，逐漸成為群眾動員的骨幹，雖然它們的宗旨較為和緩，但是目前基地組織卻俟機搶奪主導權，這是西方世界面臨的新挑戰─沒有賓拉登的激進浪潮。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% f: ` y' W; I
One is osama & one is obama. . }* h+ |1 N: K! K( B1 ?! |osama kill obama … sad? Angry?tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb7 U6 Y9 v$ D1 J" L
obama kill osama - celebration? Exciting?公仔箱論壇6 D! e- r' i6 u7 u; a. B- u5 g
"Kill" is easy to spell but hard to learn.作者: felicity2010 時間: 2011-5-4 07:18 AM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-5-4 07:59 AM 編輯 1 Q# r' W. f! k' V- w# q! a. R' Xtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。- E4 ?+ S9 s# W. K0 Q
If we look into the recent history of Afghanistan, we begin to see the irony and hypocrisy of American role contributing to the 9/11 tragedy. Reagan, Donald Rumsfeld, Senior Bush and Dick Cheney all played pivotal roles to train the Mujahideen to fight the Soviet for the invasion of Afghanistan, also taught the fighters the opium trade in order to pay the military cost. After the withdrawal of the Soviet troops, US had no established policy to reconstruct the country. The Mujahideen either became drug lords or mercenaries, and Europe and US suffered accordingly. It is an open secret that Pakistan (which is a hotbed of extremism), especially the ISI, had close relation with the Taliban and al-Qaeda, and that explains why it is so difficult for US to hunt Bin Laden down. The current administration of Hamid Karzai, backed by the US, is shaky. The only reason for an seemingly united Afghanistan is money. US (CIA) paid the warlords heavily since the beginning of the war to support Karzai. The conflicts among warlord and tribes would undermine the stability in the future. One other point, Cheney and Rumsfeld look like warmongers, but let's not forget they were CEO of Halliburton before joining the George W Bush's government. Major wars would allow them to pocket millions of dollars. There is therefore a self-interest motive as well.作者: aa00 時間: 2011-5-4 06:59 PM
Frankly, can't imagine how Obama jumped from Osama & Hussein to a new world order.8 [6 [3 R" ?- w, r* f1 \+ U
8 ?; }% f" ?: n0 ~9 Q- T! F* ptvb now,tvbnow,bttvbTalking about money, spending trillions on fighting / killing each other … shameful !tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb' O* B* g8 B; @
Taking such opportunity to earn /gain money … awful !
