返回列表 回復 發帖

[時事討論] Police-Citizen Relationship: Where do we go from here?

Police-Citizen Relationship: Wheredo we go from here?" k/ N& K! i: S' e/ o
Randy Shek @ 法政匯思
" L) `, u( d5 RTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。
2 ~2 f3 A% `) E6 e$ atvb now,tvbnow,bttvb1 {6 \5 X$ L. W6 P# v6 N* q) K
Much has been written and said about the now ex-Police Commissioner Andy Tsang (曾偉雄). His sound bites were often fodder for the press. He dismissed a call for apology as “something of a fantasy” (天方夜談)after an 8-year old boy was hit in the eye by police pepper spray. He described his officers as “doting mothers” (慈母) when they were widely criticized for their heavy-handed, even violent, approach towards protesters in the Umbrella Movement.5.39.217.76  G+ P, K: o! F) d$ C! X1 Q
3 g$ P7 ]# l2 x  s0 l4 o
Many of his sound bites generated enthusiastic satire. The most recent one was when he was asked on the eve of his retirement about the tense relationship between many Hong Kongers and the police under his leadership. Tsang responded: “if you asked kidnappers about police-citizen relationship, of course they would say that the relationship is bad”.
  h# c) i/ ^8 M3 \" f$ pTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。It is fair to say that trust between the police and Hong Kongers is at an all-time low and the image of the police in the minds of many Hong Kongers has been tarnished beyond recognition.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。+ j+ b7 y( i* c1 d* }
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb4 \# k# P8 y. d( ]
What has Tsang’s legacy achieved?  Is there more respect for the police force as a result of his hardline approach? Are Tsang’s utterances and police action really gaining the public’s trust that the police could enforce the law impartially? Or have these utterances provoked many into distrusting the police when such provocation could have been easily avoided, often by a few better-chosen words or simply keeping one’s mouth shut?
2 m! Z2 I: {, x* n$ H: `TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。
- z4 r" u5 y$ S5.39.217.765 q6 [* ], f, N
It always takes two to tango. One cannot simply say that the police bear no responsibilities for the deterioration of the relationship between them and Hong Kongers. Most Hong Kongers of my generation (those born after the ICAC was created) were brought up respecting the police and believing that the police represented dependability and righteousness. Many boys aspired to be policemen. For the police’s image to deteriorate to this extent, it could not simply have been the work of a few angry protesters or sarcastic internet artworks depicting the police as fascist brutes. There must be a reason.
6 C8 V' U9 f1 d5.39.217.76
4 M/ g5 E$ ]. W/ D7 OTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。For the 3 years after Tsang took office in January 2011, the United States Department of State pointed out in its annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices that one of the most important problems in Hong Kong was “an increase in arbitrary arrest or detention and other aggressive police tactics hampering the freedom of assembly.” The 2011 report referred to the International Federation of Journalists’ observation that 2011 saw “a rapid erosion in basic civil liberties and that the government and in particular the police were becoming more aggressive against protesters”. These Country Reports are often cited in Court in asylum cases  – where life and limbs are at stake – as authoritative reports of the state of human rights in different countries. There must be some truth in their assessment of human rights in Hong Kong.
  {  }  ?" i1 o/ atvb now,tvbnow,bttvb: U) c8 R' t1 P
During the Umbrella Movement, instances of inappropriate police action abounded. There was the deployment of 87 canisters of tear gas on peaceful protesters, which the Hong Kong Bar Association described as an “excessive and disproportionate use of force”. Then there was the police superintendent caught on camera using a baton to whack the back of a protester running past. And how about the scene where police officers were standing on the sideline as suspected triad members chased off protestors in Mongkok? Or the harrowing footage of Ken Tsang (曾健超) being beaten in a dark corner by 7 police officers?
* e0 s2 `0 L# J* s4 H' }& d公仔箱論壇6 o  X6 H9 P6 H2 l7 ?6 i
In a period of instability and tension, such as the one we now find ourselves in after the end of the Umbrella Movement, leaders of the police force must take steps to repair this torn relationship by a genuine display of impartiality and accountability. The public needs to trust that anyone who breaks the law, whether protester or police officer, will be treated equally and brought to justice. 5.39.217.769 g) s$ z% l& B( R2 X

. C: \) \! y  f" W4 L& Ztvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
$ ]9 d- Q( G- K: V* m4 b, g公仔箱論壇Clearly, the public is owed an explanation about the alleged assault on Ken Tsang by 7 police officers. We need to know that they will be properly investigated for these allegations. It is a question of trust. We need to know that if this happened to any one of us, we could depend on the police to pursue the culprit with the same determination as they would in any serious crime. We all rely on the police to gather the essential evidence so that justice is given a chance to be done.
( Y- ?( J4 x/ f% o" @7 ?# M0 `' s公仔箱論壇
$ T$ U' t4 L4 }% D: G" e+ Gtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbThe appropriateness of using 87 canisters of tear gas on largely peaceful protesters will continue to be hotly disputed. While the public knew that the police had a tough job to do in this massive public order situation, the Hong Kong Bar Association’s characterisation of this as an “excessive and disproportionate use of force” is a fair one. If the police believe, in hindsight, that they could have done better in handling the situation, then simply admitting it might help them regain some measure of respect from the public.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。( \# V- E: C2 j  O9 g, Z& n

- j! [2 P+ w  I) }( t" I- W2 QTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Much of policing is about offering positive protection of human rights. For instance, the right to life is protected by the laws creating offences of murder and unlawful killing. It is up to the police to prevent and detect such crimes.  On a wider level, police protection of the right to life manifests itself in their providing social services such as responding to calls of domestic violence and emergency services where life and limb are in jeopardy. 1 u$ k( J8 k5 X
6 O. i: K  U. g- I( _

2 e$ ]2 K4 U' V0 b8 Atvb now,tvbnow,bttvbAnother example is the prevention and detection of theft offences, which directly contribute to the protection of the right to own property and the prohibition against arbitrary deprivation of property. The police’s duty to protect other human rights such as the freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and demonstration is no less than their duty to protect the right to life or the right to own private property.
2 M' ?( m4 I1 h* v; j: J5.39.217.76
$ \! k3 K& S' q3 U0 W$ y5.39.217.76Despite claims of political neutrality by the police, Hong Kongers need to see that the police can be trusted to discharge their mission without any hint of sympathy or hostility towards a suspect’s political affiliation. Be he yellow ribbon or blue ribbon, pro- or anti- establishment, if the law is broken, the police force will bring him to justice. If police officers broke the law, the police force will bring them to justice just the same. Being accountable will earn back the respect many Hong Kongers so desperately need to have for the police force. One can only hope that the new Police Commissioner will ease this tension in police-citizen relationship by showing that the police are indeed impartial and accountable. We Hong Kongers want to trust and respect our police force.
  
徐少驊: 給香港警隊的公開信5.39.217.76' k! u( ^& V4 i5 i& f  M
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb% b" X: p6 U- o  t. a: m" z

+ k# q- l: k' ?/ L智障男被屈殺人犯,警方說程序無錯,故無須道歉及無人要負責。保安局局長黎棟國輕描淡寫的說:「警方一向抱着尋找真相的精神,對所有案件都本着專業精神,適當地處理。」完全沒有道歉的意向,這樣的態度簡直是對受害人及其家屬再一次的傷害!4 m! j8 {+ {# ?& Z

. t1 m4 ]$ O% E, ?7 ^& A* ?* T/ y5.39.217.76我們的警隊發生什麼事了?!TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。$ e8 z1 s+ y* t; \1 ^3 I5 L; W* k

( B% }! C+ m6 h3 g0 |5.39.217.76是的,凡事總有出錯的可能,錯了,立即認了及道歉,這是常識吧!tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb7 _; ?0 r" D" U4 J% E0 q

8 y1 Z" d/ m' K% ~拉錯了人,向受害人及其家屬道歉是應有之義,立即作內部檢討才是負責任的態度。何況警方拘捕疑人時,疑人的親人已經表示疑人智障,警方仍然按一般的審問程序處理,這難道真的沒有檢視的空間。
5 t/ N3 s, h* g1 \& }8 u+ x$ itvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
6 @# G1 D) m8 P5 L. i( ?5.39.217.76昔日警務處處長鄧竟成因為經常代表警隊為失誤道歉,因而被戲謔為Sorry Sir,但再來看看今天死不認錯的情況,在對比之下,鄧竟成的英明(其實是理所當然)就立即顯示出來了。曾經有說,鄧的軟弱風格令市民看不起警察,真的如此嗎?你看看由曾偉雄的強悍作風為警察在香港市民的心目中留下了怎樣的形象?!
; p) Q+ @) s. L- Z( X) w
3 `* p1 ^1 ~; [  C9 Wtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb在智障男被屈殺人犯一事不久,網絡上出現了這樣的一幅相片:一塊生豬肉蓋上警徽。我看了之後不禁慨嘆,怎麼香港警隊的形象會時光倒流至上世紀七十年代之前呢?!  ]6 w  r0 p6 U; |% O% X4 Z

' J- G- |# v' v; n4 V  W8 R對於警察,尤其是前線負責執法的警員,我一直是十分尊重的。大學畢業回港,當了一年電視台助導又當了一年多的專題記者,我也曾經投考警務督察,立志除暴安良,但最後不獲取錄,原因當然不可能曉得,不知道跟我在澳洲留學時參與學運及當記者時寫過三篇有關警權的文章有否關連。
. U* o5 N  Y2 U5 Q公仔箱論壇: s7 \% P$ X% z& M+ P
警察,在我那個年代,自從成立了廉政公署,他們的形象就一路向好,直至回歸之後,仍然得到絕大部分香港市民的信任,「專業」一直是香港警隊的標籤,穿上警察的制服就代表了法治的精神。4 Z8 R) D% P+ r0 L
但今天香港警隊的形象跟隨著曾偉雄的所謂「鷹派」風格查實是為政治服務而插水式下墜。濫打、濫捕、濫控成風,「專業」一詞被市民「搣柴」般從此跟香港警隊無關,穿上警察制服令市民想起的不是「法治」而是「政權打手」。公仔箱論壇6 B2 _- L$ }! g/ w4 i- r* k

  F  P4 ?, ?: \+ p: ]或許有前線警察辯説,示威抗議的人當中也有些是故意挑釁警察的,警察也是人,也有人的情緒。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。" ?5 j7 ]8 ]0 L

: q. ]5 N1 G4 l$ g# a公仔箱論壇我絕對不否定上述的講法,但是你們是擁有公權力的人,你們拿著的是可以致人死命的警棍和警槍,遲些還有隨時射爆人眼球的超強力水炮,你們受過專業訓練,我們所要求你們的,就是做回一名專業的警察,不要拿著警棍發瘋似的亂舞,不要為了發洩怒火而使用遠遠超出需要的武力,不要胡亂拘捕、檢控,不要砌生豬肉,不要為政治服務,就是這麼多而已,不過份吧!
+ W# y4 Q$ ^9 U( w5.39.217.76
$ o, w7 c, Q9 Y. R是的,我仍然相信香港還有很多好的、專業的、立志除暴安良的前線警察,故此,我仍然主張抗爭者不要在警察專業地履行職責時衝擊、辱罵、挑戰他們。
3 C% n# a& D5 T* d) _tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb公仔箱論壇! q" @7 Q9 W" C: b9 K* R3 Q
毋忘初衷!無論是抗爭者還是警察,也必要經常反復思考。公仔箱論壇" ?3 b8 S8 }8 S1 Q9 ]! T! j8 F
當差所為何事?不是為政權服務,而是為了除暴安良,維護正義。
, q7 T; u# ?) q4 M6 p5 Z0 M+ _公仔箱論壇
; B5 N" M3 X, ]: E9 Qtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb我深信,香港警隊若是專業執法,維護法紀,香港市民包括大部分抗爭者是不會因為他們履行職責而非議他們的。
4 g: [  F, q0 \! G, U3 H
4 D8 ]' L% Q- F5.39.217.762011那一年,曾偉雄當上警隊一哥沒多久,時任中國副總理的李克強訪港,曾偉雄領導之下,警察的濫捕手段令市民及人權監察團體嘩然,曾的「黑影論」和道歉是「天方夜譚」的言論激起了民憤,那時我在《老徐的時評》頻道短片警告,曾偉雄繼續維持這種所謂的「鷹派」作風,當市民普遍地感到社會上公義受壓而不得彰顯,社會就有很大可能走上「公民抗命」以違法擾亂社會秩序為抗爭手段的亂局,那時候「佔領中環」的主張還未出籠。% W0 v$ P8 Z/ G8 N/ X

2 X9 t5 ]5 X0 [1 P& y今天公民抗命已經出現,維持了79天的雨傘運動揭開了序幕,政府或許以為在拖延執法的策略運用得宜之下,把運動拖死了,是贏了漂亮一仗。事實是無論是政府和警隊都付出了沉重的代價,政府管治失效,而警隊的專業形象付諸流水。
) `4 I( y8 S8 B  N5.39.217.76* r+ p; n- s, D/ \
政府和警隊要是不知反省,繼續瞎搞,容我在此再次預告,公民抗命只會更加激烈和頻繁,到時只怕警察的形象淪落至上世紀七十年代前的「有牌爛仔」更不堪!
  
拉錯智障男 1700人聯署促警道歉公仔箱論壇- c; F6 z, F/ B) a/ }: Q6 Y% C

+ ?( M( Y; @+ Q* C, ITVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 $ i) b) D3 K! |- `" N# m1 p
張超雄與事主家屬,召開記者會。 (圖片來源:張超雄議辦提供)
/ J% E* A5 p# _8 n. k5.39.217.765 q: P! f4 X5 H, b( C* _0 F
立法會議員張超雄及一群關心事件的市民、殘疾團體昨在網上發起聯署,去信保安局局長黎棟國及新上任的警務處處長盧偉聰,要求警方就高調拘捕智障男子等錯誤,向受害人及家屬道歉,蘋果日報報道,昨日約有1,700人聯署。
" w* O0 a& a0 t& Y* ]5.39.217.765.39.217.764 R; y+ y1 b3 g6 P
聯署批評,警方高調拘捕受害人,更發佈不實信息,指受害人有自閉、行為偏差、憎恨狗隻,這些是對受害人及其他自閉人士的誣捏,嚴重損害受害人的聲譽及影響公眾對自閉症人士的觀感。$ {" n/ \  t% Y) n: F0 G1 x

7 j" U5 {; i; w' j6 `9 P" U9 YTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。聯署又批評,事主在錄口供未有家人陪同,警方以引導式及封閉式提問,藉以「創作」警察認為有利的口供以控告受害人;他們批評,警察涉嫌執法不公,已經不單是政治取態問題,更是有種不理是非,只顧警察面子而失去專業判斷,令人質疑警察的專業操守,只向弱者抽刃。
" Z) K: w6 N) M/ R( C/ n  U/ Z4 T5.39.217.76公仔箱論壇% V4 `; Y% d3 c
警方早前就遛狗翁被殺案,拉錯智障男子。警方辯稱「被捕人曾向警方表示與案有關」,但家屬質疑警方錄取口供程序,未有考慮被捕人無能力作出合理回應。而警方向家人提供的筆錄口供,內容與視像錄影的對白亦「有出入」。
- u5 i0 g$ G$ y, A* K5.39.217.76. u. {/ ?' U8 E* w
聯署連結:https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1b_qtL-Kgfj1iXsVMgZE5Ixk318R3gKwnQX1vGlvg76M/viewform
  
返回列表