返回列表 回復 發帖

[港澳台] 黃仁龍獲頒名譽法學博士演說全文

本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2014-3-19 10:03 AM 編輯 tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb* }! j% P1 w9 F( O, u9 m
公仔箱論壇1 T" ?# b# I( X
黃仁龍獲頒名譽法學博士演說全文
2 Y( C4 ~; [' ~1 B+ dTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。

9 M, {* g( y. l公仔箱論壇
  f6 r6 f) ]( qtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
# f, V' x6 [' S3 H  V; F/ s
; D7 g3 Q9 s8 Y5.39.217.76
, U4 p0 i' ]7 Q
【明報專訊】編按:前律政司長黃仁龍昨日(318日)獲香港大學頒授名譽法學博士,他在致詞時提及劉進圖遇襲案及新聞自由。以下為英文演說全文。
( \5 d7 s6 S" S: P6 I. c( d! lTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。* I2 _. M: v0 {+ B+ |# [+ b

7 G# h9 D% Z8 c4 I) v: }9 YSpeech of Mr. Wong Yan Lung SC at the 190thCongregation of the University of Hong Kong on 18th March 2014
; e3 d9 m* ?2 w5.39.217.76公仔箱論壇' ^- k: ^  L4 e% D1 ^/ O4 Q
Mr. Pro-Chancellor, Chairman of Council, Vice-Chancellor,Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen,: B& X* n) z: [  f3 Q' S4 y

; L. [# N/ x5 K: u5.39.217.76On behalf of all the Honorary Graduands, may I extend to the University our sincere gratitude for conferring upon us these exceptional honours, and to Professor Wilkinson for your kind words of citations.  U& ]2 U; c6 E4 s  X" w
: L& e% q$ R, r  e) o) P5 S
"Has Hong Kong changed?" It is a question we often hear nowadays. Changes can bring progress. Changes can also mean decline. But changes are inevitable. The University is the cradle for the forces of change. It is the place where our young people develop the readiness and resilience to face changes. Changes are inevitable because of diversity in life. Human Interests are diverse; human opinions even more so. Different interests and views divide people rather than uniting them. What holds a society together is a higher and transcending consensus in the form of a shared set ofvalues, upon which the operation of society is fastened.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb( k4 c* l- }! Y; j8 {1 x; U5 a- O
5.39.217.763 b3 w" g3 |( R0 f4 `# N) U

5 H3 g1 R- c3 i- e5 STVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。It sounds all too familiar and cliché .However, when Kevin Lau, former editor of Ming Pao and fellow alumni of this University was brutally attacked last month, the core of that societal consensus was wounded. The baseline fundamentals are being shaken. The shock went beyond the natural abhorrence to the violence and cruelty. The horrendous act has stirred up a much graver and wider concern: how could such dangers and threats still exist in Hong Kong today terrorizing those who are but dedicated to their calling? The alarm bell is ringing loud, culminating in an equally intense determination to ensure that none of our cherished common values will be impaired. And as we see the increasing polarization of Hong Kong, with opposing camps of demonstrators shouting abuses at each other and even descending into scuffles, with more extreme and irrational clashes among different groupings on the Internet, we know the scope of our hitherto precarious consensus is dwindling fast.5.39.217.76/ w* E4 r, c0 j2 C4 |( A  }
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb$ L3 `6 D0 @9 `0 A

, M1 H: U: k- y& L5.39.217.76What can we hold on to when changes come to overwhelm us like tsunamis, or when they come to soak us quietly like ripples?How do we take changes positively and courageously, so that we can pick up the surfboard, leave the shore, and ride on the waves of changes? On essentials,may we go for integrity; on non-essentials, liberty, and on all things,charity.
5 D5 H; i( ^' s8 u* X! C
) x+ i' p) z& W5 z/ G5.39.217.76
公仔箱論壇9 f; v$ }0 x" l4 [6 F% K2 u
On essentials, integrity
8 p+ _8 k* {; @+ x/ Ptvb now,tvbnow,bttvb! {& C& R/ n: g; Z. G+ F+ W2 ^
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb8 d; u# I- V1 N$ c
The determination between the essential and the non-essential is often subjective, controversial and even philosophical.However, the active pursuit of the demarcation between the two is necessary forthe well-being of the individual as well as the community. Because identifying and fortifying something as one's personal essential can have far-reaching consequences, the task should be undertaken with the greatest of care and as a continuous process. Take the protection of rights as an example. Rights are not mere desires or needs. Even for rights protected under the Basic Law and the Bill of Rights, some are more fundamental than others. As held by the Courts,the degree of inviolability differs amongst those rights, and the margin of appreciation can apply to some but not others.5.39.217.766 O# c, i& U3 @* S0 ]
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb6 {& K5 n* a  u" \
) B8 \, Q  Z4 v( a. g
"Core values" is perhaps one of the most commonly used terms these days. "Core values" very often are equated with a cause or an ideology, and sometimes with a host of rights and freedoms. What can be easily forgotten, however, is this: It is not the cause itself, but the people who are supposed to benefit from this cause, that is far more important. We do need passion if we are to do anything well. Yet passion is but the horsepower; it cannot replace the engine itself. The engine still needs to work with precision and accuracy. Can the people really benefit from what we are advocating and fighting for, or is it just our own passion being satisfied, or our own belief being vindicated, or our own ego being feathered?
* k, X" m+ {$ S' i
" f. B! S5 W  \% @5 n# D( kHowever, once established with rigorous examination and firm conviction, the essentials must be guarded at all costs.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb, ^, F; ^; U" Z$ n

1 T! K& M8 ~! \: D/ M3 o4 U0 _tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbFirst, we must guard our essentials against invasion: when Kevin was attacked, it was not just the elementary law and order, or the right to life and security of the person, that have been violated. The right to the freedom of opinion and of the press, going beyond the individual's interests, has been subjected to intimidation. To quote from an ancient Egyptian word of wisdom, "To take no notice of a violent attack is to strengthen the heart of the enemy. Vigour is valiant, but cowardice is vile." When violence strikes to subdue legitimate rights, it is striking at the very fabric of our civil society, and our community has rightly responded with united and strong condemnation. The community must react with the strong hands of the law: let no criminal go unpunished.& T: u* Q+ {* @
# N6 c3 ]) H' d! s2 a! D

: g4 h# i7 u0 k$ e8 F& GWe - and particularly those who are in the front line exercising those rights - must react courageously. Respond with the confidence that even the iron knife will break in the bare but righteous hands joined together. Respond with retribution but not revenge, respond with a renewed determination to exercise our rights even more responsibly and to perform our duties even more diligently. This is by far the more effective way to protect any right we advocate, so that the inherent virtue of the right or freedom being protected can be seen. The conquest is not by battle alone but more by the demonstration of trustworthy custodianship. That has often been overlooked and, sadly, the excessive and abusive use of rights by some turned out to be the most destructive agent of those cherished rights.
: o7 k/ F6 z* \# R; N6 L( ]6 N, b8 f

# A$ T9 B  ~+ x( j7 s2 l( T5.39.217.76Secondly, we must guard the essentials against the more subtle erosion. Integrity is the vigilance and resistance against the gradual abrasion. Integrity is the moral strength to resist temptations, to put the essentials above one self and one's interests. In the wise counsel of the Proverbs : "Above all else, guard your heart, for it is the wellspring of life." Don't become, as C.S. Lewis described,"men with no chest", who are deficient in the moral force to turn his head knowledge of virtues into practical power to overcome his animal instincts.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。# I( o5 K& f; Y; M6 T) V4 Q( c7 `

+ }" u  N8 c3 K& PTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。
2 `9 X! E4 Q9 o' H$ e8 J8 B
The rule of law is not only the framework,but the entire environment, in which basic rights and freedoms are safeguarded,and by which fairness and justice are being maintained. Like the natural environment, it is vulnerable to slow and gradual changes. We have to be particularly vigilant in our unprecedented constitutional order of One Country Two Systems, where interfaces between the two different legal systems between the Mainland and Hong Kong have generated novel issues with immense legal intricacies and profound political implications, and where judicial adjudication of any constitutional debates is required to simultaneously satisfy both the Basic Law and the common law, as well as the justice of the case. The heightened vigilance to protect the rule of law is also necessitated by the rapid integration between Hong Kong and the Mainland in the social and economic realms. Temptations abound with big moneys flowing in. Having overseen public prosecutions for 7 years and now back in private practice in the commercial field, I can testify that money corrupts and a lot of money corrupts massively.
6 J( g8 f- m7 x. i5.39.217.765.39.217.760 m/ ^$ s+ z+ l! s) T6 `! `; Q
We will be the best guardians of the rule of law, the indisputable essential, when people less familiar with it can see that we will not trade it for any personal gain or convenience. The values we champion can be best realised and kept if we embrace them in our everyday life:showing respect for the law, insisting on fair play, sticking to honesty, and being honourable in the fields of business, vocation, competition, and other forms of human interactions. The real challenge is not so much denouncing the plain and monstrous evil. The real worry lies in our propensity to permit the lesser evils to slip in gradually. The law is not observed merely as formality but substance. The rule of law is truly observed when we ourselves are not being observed.
4 w. {: u& N$ B$ T: W  p# p5.39.217.762 {; J  U& P4 P6 `$ V$ D5 p% B
+ l3 S# p9 B1 ?- `6 A* }
Furthermore, cherish and guard our judicial independence. That is the bedrock. While no individual judges are infallible and the high quality of the judiciary must be maintained, the public must respect the judiciary as an institution and as the gatekeeper of the rule of law. Judicial decisions may not always be popular or politically correct. It will be a very sad day if they are. As the Chief Justice said at the Opening of the Legal Year, although disputes between the parties before the Court may have political, economic or social consequences, such as those cases involving matters of government policy, at all times the courts look only to the legal issues that divide the parties.' s0 ^" B! l4 y4 @, ]

4 u9 X0 D" z) j$ `( W! OTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。On non-essentials: Liberty1 e! C# w3 r+ Y6 f
6 O$ i* p- H( m
Now onto non-essentials, quite the opposite.For applying the same hard-edged regimen to non-essentials makes one obstructive, destructive and an unnecessary stumbling block to the fostering of any meaningful consensus, agreement or cooperation.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。. e( l& r" q. T+ B* `0 t4 V) Q0 q
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。/ u# Y  c. B# `$ q
Reluctance to change with times, due to insecurity, ignorance, idiosyncrasies, or sheer idleness leads to stagnation.For an economy like Hong Kong, grandeur or decline depends on how resilient and adaptable we are. Hong Kong cannot afford to be inward looking or self-complacent. Liberty on non-essentials allows us to respect, even if we cannot embrace, people who are different, people of different races, cultures or places of origin, people who think differently, speak differently or behave differently. I have heard lamentations that some of our young people today shun competition, particularly competition coming from outside of Hong Kong. They resort to different forms of protectionism or escapism, and camouflage them by grand facade. The "indigenous culture" and "the Hong Kong identity", which are of course precious in themselves, are unfortunately deployed as a convenient exit from the race that must be run. Instead of seeking "globalization", some have retired into "tribalization". On this type of soil, prejudice and discrimination, particularly on account of race, culture or background, spring up like weeds. Legitimate differences,fanned by some unfortunate scramble for limited resources, escalate into causes for intolerance, blame, repulsion, and even open conflicts. That will certainly bring Hong Kong down. Liberty on non-essentials also breaks the inertia to changes within oneself. It is the lifeline to creativity. It prepares the mind to be stimulated upon encountering differences and changes. It sets the mind free to depart from the old and conformist ways. It is the energy in the new waves that works powerfully within the person.
. b/ z; X& E: Y6 M公仔箱論壇9 x9 n" e: J  U1 @

6 N7 @; y1 D( D% c( P9 b+ f$ C! Gtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbOn all things: Charity- b, t6 {4 ?. h" s" N/ d3 p
公仔箱論壇4 B3 d( {" h1 e: B7 y4 O  x

* g7 M- B4 L  ^6 NTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Finally, what underpins integrity? What refines the moral steel? What summons courage? What motives the pursuit of goodness above self interests? Conversely, what breeds violence? What spawns hatred? What brings about discrimination? What gives birth to cowardice? What results in compromise? Is my home a castle or is it a refuge? Are my possessions personal takings or accessible resources? Am I "the one and only" or am I just "one of the many"? So much depends on the attitude of the individuals and the culture of the community they build: keen to grab or dare to give.
- Q6 x7 l! r" K& w# V! qTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。! m( T6 \7 I7 ^  ^; T$ L

9 G* e$ G; d5 w) O7 Qtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbLook to the movies (the good ones I mean):there are certain universal or eternal themes or endings that bring comfort,warmth and a very satisfying sense of wellness. Why? Because they are in line with what the human soul longs and aspires for. These soothing things need not be confined to productions of the "Dream Factory". Dreams can give rise to long-term goals and short-term objectives. There are still many"real people and real things" in Hong Kong that touch our hearts:"Ming Gor" who runs the "Canteen for the Poor" in Shamshuipo; the late Dr. Chung Chi-yung of Shue Yan University who gave up her all for the grooming of the young; and many more around you and me, who have gone unnoticed.
5 K8 l5 R$ o% g) y5.39.217.765.39.217.76. [! S( }$ p: u3 W
Many of the "real things" we do not see, and therefore we play no part in them, because we are all too busy with our lives, our business, our career, our family, our children, and our own pursuit of excellence of one kind or another. On top of the pursuit of excellence, perhaps we should emphasize more the pursuit of the purpose of attaining excellence. In this race of life, if the ultimate prize cannot be shared, it is of limited value. If the crown does not come with the calling to serve, it is but a corruptible one.
& P  O# j$ R0 D- X4 G5.39.217.762 Y- _$ Q- C7 r7 q/ u# b

5 d+ C, s- L* Y/ B5 m4 \5.39.217.76Amidst the changes and uncertainties, if we adorn all things with charity, there is still tremendous hope for Hong Kong.
  
即時點評│袁國強避談新聞自由 黃仁龍李國能之言高下立分                        / o8 B8 }) t7 K7 T* G  i2 |$ ]
                                                
3 M- A# q) h4 @2 ?! }. ttvb now,tvbnow,bttvbtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb7 {" A0 u( I3 v1 C# v$ |
5.39.217.768 ^/ r5 ~! }* p$ r  K
言論自由及新聞自由是香港的核心價值,前律政司司長黃仁龍昨獲香港大學頒授名譽法學博士學位時,就以《明報》前總編輯劉進圖遇襲案來形容事件威脅言論自由及新聞自由,更直指「警鐘已經響起」;同樣在港大法律學院的場合,終審法院前首席法官李國能日前也警告,香港的言論及新聞自由正受威脅,兩度呼籲港人要高度警惕,捍衞核心價值和自由。
1 m' c4 h2 a! ]4 _TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。  ^" L$ D. L( p+ V0 v
黃仁龍及李國能兩人,同屬前朝政府司法界中的代表人物,而現任律政司司長袁國強,又會如何回應同一議題?他今早被問到香港的新聞自由是否「已經響起警號」時,卻是未有回應。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb, d- f; u( Q9 d) c. T/ m
公仔箱論壇0 v6 g0 p4 m5 H. B2 D# l7 M
事實上,翻查近期報道,不少法律界「殿堂級」人士也都有就香港新聞言論自由受威脅開腔的,港大法律學院院長陳文敏就表示,近期連串事件令人憂慮言論和新聞自由受威脅,認同李國能所指必須挺身捍衞,直言「自由唔係坐喺度就有,係要我哋努力維護同保障」。終審法院非常任法官包致金也稱,憲制有責任去維護香港的言論自由,法治除建基於民心,也需依靠法官和傳媒去鞏固。5.39.217.765 }: D6 H6 i4 d) K  \4 T9 \
公仔箱論壇9 Z$ U/ m' \) [0 i+ Y9 h- I. J1 V
必須指出,律政司司長主管律政司,專門負責香港政府的所有法律事務,當然這個也包括落實《基本法》,而《基本法》第27條,正是列明「香港居民享有言論、新聞、出版的自由,結社、集會、遊行、示威的自由,組織和參加工會、罷工的權利和自由」。既然如此,袁國強對捍衞新聞自由與言論自由自然也是責無旁貸,更遑論要在風雨中作出表態吧,惟他沒有回應,恐怕更反襯出黃仁龍昨日發言時引述的一句古埃及箴言:「對暴力視而不見,只會助長敵人的心」,更是擲地有聲。
  
                 
5 F! F* p9 Q$ o- vtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb黃仁龍嘆「金錢腐化法治」 中信泰富榮智健惹人反思                        
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。. M. z$ a: d. t- W+ M, }
                                                $ S  j2 `3 @2 g# `
/ G4 ^5 I$ ~" c/ T/ J5 e  O
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb) U5 o5 T! k0 O

1 y# l( ?$ L  _tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb前律政司司長黃仁龍昨日在香港大學致辭時,談到中港在經濟及社會的合作日益緊密下,港人必須更致力於維護法治。黃仁龍認為,中港經濟合併所帶來的的大量資金流入,是對要堅守香港法治的人的誘惑。黃仁龍指出,根據他作為律政司司長的七年公職生涯及兩年在商界私人執業的觀察,他可以證明金錢讓人(法治)腐化,大量的金錢則令人(法治)更腐化。
1 d8 e2 k) Z% ^$ l  Ptvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
* t# C, Y: X: C6 J9 rTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。黃仁龍在自己獲頒榮譽法學博士之日特別提到中國資本對香港法治的挑戰,似乎對此感觸良多。《852郵報》翻查資料後,認為在黃仁龍在任期間,紅色資本在香港其中一個較矚目的醜聞,是當時由中國前首富榮智健擔任主席的中信泰富,在2008年公司被揭發涉嫌隱瞞「炒燶」外滙期權合約(Accumulator)的事件。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。- B" L5 C# g) v9 {& j

* {: _9 x, {# m. s; N) l& [+ Ftvb now,tvbnow,bttvb. E7 I2 [; k$ w9 x. m8 d
中信泰富事件曾震撼港人
' W* O0 @+ B/ K6 L) |. w( DTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。; I9 U1 f/ L/ o1 C. `0 l' N
中信泰富一直在澳洲擁有採礦業務。當時,公司聲稱為了對沖貨幣風險,向匯豐、渣打,甚至是中國的國家開發銀行簽下了潛在風險數以百億的Accumulator合約。根據這些合約,倘若澳元兌美元的匯價高於0.87,則中信泰富能透過0.87這個「優惠價」向這些銀行購買澳元。
# q5 ?, Z8 o6 G" b8 h! c' W4 c公仔箱論壇
: s7 h& P4 P& V5 W5.39.217.76然而,倘若澳元跌穿0.87,則中信泰富需不停以0.87這個價錢接收澳元。結果,澳元在簽訂合約後輾轉跌至0.7,而中信泰富,則錄得了最少147億港元損失,金額接近公司市值的一半。中信泰富揭發事件後翌日,其股價下跌了近55%,不少小股民,蒙受極嚴重的損失。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb# f- E; ^- m6 v+ W, L* ?+ a

# L/ w+ w/ L* j+ F' Ktvb now,tvbnow,bttvb本來,事件可說是一間公司的錯誤投資決定而已。然而,在媒體的一再追查下,不少事件背後的「黑幕」便開始漸漸浮現。首先,中信泰富的董事會承認對事件並不知情。中信泰富董事總經理范鴻齡當時聲言,財務董事張立憲與財務總監周志賢並未向公司董事會匯報合約的風險。
( E- f' M( [9 [( I  Z5 ~TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。
2 B. b  _) A3 K0 y+ I1 ^然而,董事局面對員工如此茲事體大的「欺瞞」,當時的主席榮智健竟然表示認為兩人並無欺詐行為,因此不會對他們採取法律行動,只會把他們解雇了事。部分媒體對此繼續追查,發現在與各家銀行簽立的多份外匯Accumulator合約中,另一名董事會成員Vernon Francis Moore的簽名其實亦經常出現,反映中信泰富董事會對所投資的產品,其實最少有兩名董事會成員知悉其事,而非中信泰富董事局口中的全不知情。而Moore現時仍然繼續是中信泰富的管理層。公仔箱論壇  u1 I5 Q$ ]$ D
5.39.217.76  P+ u, ]/ }) g( V2 K
更重要的是,在一份Accumulator合約中,出現了一個類似榮智健女兒榮明芳的簽名。然而,中信泰富卻以榮明芳不是高級職員為由,只對其降職處分了事。中信泰富的「寬大為懷」,當然不能讓公眾及小股東接受,紛紛要求政府徹查事件。5.39.217.76! h% a4 Z+ i! K- [" b

9 `% u. _, E! X0 A# y公仔箱論壇一直協助小股東向中信泰富追討損失的立法會議員涂謹申曾在《蘋果日報》指,中信泰富曾在08年9月26日一份通函中,提及集團的「財務或交易狀況概無出現任何重大不利變動」。涂謹申稱,有關聲明足以誤導小股東相信集團發展穩健而繼續投資,或已觸犯《證券及期貨條例》第384條「提供虛假或具誤導性的資料」。因此,任何董事只要在該日子前知悉事件,均有可能需負上責任。因此,可能要就事件負上刑事責任的,包括了榮智健、范鴻齡,及連累中信泰富炒燶外匯的財務董事張立憲與財務總監周志賢等人。
5 ~/ Q! M7 t* Y0 ?& ^TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。. H  n# Q' z/ x$ y% M8 [
政府調查「雷聲大雨點小」
+ m* y& u, `% l. q: z8 T! r7 P! Y+ o% wTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。0 j! [- Y1 D  W% S: O- t( w
雖然,證監會在當年宣布調查中信泰富,商罪科在09年4月到中信泰富總部撿走百多箱文件。然而,政府至今至只控告了時任財務部助理董事崔永年涉嫌內幕交易。榮智健與范鴻齡等其他高層至今安然無恙,小股東的損失,至今亦無法追回。而崔永年在被中信泰富解僱後,不但沒有身敗名裂,反而被雅居樂聘請為首席財務官。事件至今其實已經過去了五年之多,律政司發言人仍一再強調調查尚未完成,說法實在令人難以信服。5.39.217.76( e. S1 U! [) M) i3 H5 E! d

/ R* E5 z/ Y  Q8 ^+ t: [8 o& F; cTVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。就此,《852郵報》向一直為小股民爭取權益的立法會議員何俊仁議員查詢。何俊仁表示,他們與小市民一直未有放棄就事件爭取一個合理說法。他們一直在邀約警方及律政署提供與案件相關的資料。被問到他認為政府為什麼遲遲不處理事件時。何俊仁苦笑回答,這個問題應該要問律政司,而他自己的估算,當然是政府怯於紅色資本背後的政治勢力。TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。8 a% o1 {9 g; W/ U
/ n1 ]8 \% v6 x3 A  m
黃仁龍在其任內,未有控告中信泰富的高層們。未知中信泰富事件,會否是他昨日說出中港經濟合併下,「金錢腐化法治」的其中一個重要佐證?
  
返回列表