返回列表 回復 發帖

飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師

唔知點解劇中講到 飛機維修 好似做地盤一樣?
* o4 \# G+ o$ x
. @" \) @4 i0 y7 K5.39.217.76就算做到飛機工程師都係一樣!tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb6 N& j) I# l; |* T4 G

5 w+ P* ]  C6 F. A" w% W雖然物理上真係一個在天、一個在地。
真的。。。不解释了
事實係咁
! ]( U8 v6 E. I; K, p. b7 W我十年前都差D去左做維修員5 t7 ~8 X7 e# e5 p, l4 q, T
同做文員差唔多個價 中三就做到
really? i thought you need a university degree
飛機師人工高D
做維修只是技工,叫工程師只是好聽
如果做到夏晨這個位有三萬五至四萬人工,照哥是工程師有4萬至4萬5人工。屬於專業人事。
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
totally agree
They are not engineer, they are mechanics, like a car mechanics you see in the garage. ( o, I" ?1 b9 W( F( R
9 o. ?$ b' O1 n1 a, e' }' O
Engineer actually need to create/build something. Plane Engineer build/design planes, what these people in the drama does are just mechanics, they repairs and replace planes.
$ g1 D9 m* O- f, J: ^+ a公仔箱論壇; U; p# ]" R1 i
Engineer wrote plane instruction manuals, 夏晨's mechanic team read and follow it.
aircraft engineering isn't that good of a job in hk.. specially the paid, on the other hand, pilots as second officer earn more than being an licensed engineer.. and free sandwiches too so=sandwich eaters
Pilot's salary always is better...
我認為維修的只應該稱技工,設計製造的才可叫工程師,
呢個世界係咁架啦, PILOT 係最巴閉~
飛機師當然是人工好啦...要講天份的.....
返回列表