返回列表 回復 發帖

飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師

唔知點解劇中講到 飛機維修 好似做地盤一樣?6 r" s: [1 H& `
5.39.217.76. O; k  Q# Y$ ]& n
就算做到飛機工程師都係一樣!
' I$ f* A; y# D4 n: X7 s- \, s
! c" R0 J8 k/ r- |雖然物理上真係一個在天、一個在地。
真的。。。不解释了
事實係咁3 G; y8 k) h; z; Y
我十年前都差D去左做維修員
5 K8 x: I5 T& s. H; j% c4 s同做文員差唔多個價 中三就做到
really? i thought you need a university degree
飛機師人工高D
做維修只是技工,叫工程師只是好聽
如果做到夏晨這個位有三萬五至四萬人工,照哥是工程師有4萬至4萬5人工。屬於專業人事。
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
totally agree
They are not engineer, they are mechanics, like a car mechanics you see in the garage.
' f/ [8 {* S- U, R  ^tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb公仔箱論壇# e+ s0 s( ]/ D
Engineer actually need to create/build something. Plane Engineer build/design planes, what these people in the drama does are just mechanics, they repairs and replace planes.2 f+ L: J& \0 I% d8 e# r
$ g& n3 j9 o  ?& G4 T+ V2 R
Engineer wrote plane instruction manuals, 夏晨's mechanic team read and follow it.
aircraft engineering isn't that good of a job in hk.. specially the paid, on the other hand, pilots as second officer earn more than being an licensed engineer.. and free sandwiches too so=sandwich eaters
Pilot's salary always is better...
我認為維修的只應該稱技工,設計製造的才可叫工程師,
呢個世界係咁架啦, PILOT 係最巴閉~
飛機師當然是人工好啦...要講天份的.....
返回列表