返回列表 回復 發帖

飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師

唔知點解劇中講到 飛機維修 好似做地盤一樣?6 v- m/ r$ {; ]

7 R8 J. Y+ O  _  h. n, n就算做到飛機工程師都係一樣!
$ a2 r$ ^: d- g' G# P+ S2 X
, j7 B; G7 r% ~/ ]' o' d公仔箱論壇雖然物理上真係一個在天、一個在地。
真的。。。不解释了
事實係咁
9 p; F5 N- n- n5.39.217.76我十年前都差D去左做維修員5.39.217.769 U: ]7 @( }5 J( v# |
同做文員差唔多個價 中三就做到
really? i thought you need a university degree
飛機師人工高D
做維修只是技工,叫工程師只是好聽
如果做到夏晨這個位有三萬五至四萬人工,照哥是工程師有4萬至4萬5人工。屬於專業人事。
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
totally agree
They are not engineer, they are mechanics, like a car mechanics you see in the garage.
9 u* D- ]6 A4 B公仔箱論壇
& f1 }) K+ v+ L+ _7 OEngineer actually need to create/build something. Plane Engineer build/design planes, what these people in the drama does are just mechanics, they repairs and replace planes.2 j/ K' p# i- n# M9 h8 F
0 e' X3 q# y8 {: Y  }3 [
Engineer wrote plane instruction manuals, 夏晨's mechanic team read and follow it.
aircraft engineering isn't that good of a job in hk.. specially the paid, on the other hand, pilots as second officer earn more than being an licensed engineer.. and free sandwiches too so=sandwich eaters
Pilot's salary always is better...
我認為維修的只應該稱技工,設計製造的才可叫工程師,
呢個世界係咁架啦, PILOT 係最巴閉~
飛機師當然是人工好啦...要講天份的.....
返回列表