[時事討論] 保護消費人法案一旦通過‧停車場須對汽車負責 ， 描述： 消費的我们对此事有和看法？？

amgo

对！非常赞成公仔箱論壇" p: V6 l. B8 W- J$ C: R& o
地方是你们的，但是钱是我们给的，为何还不负责任！9 V7 e* |1 \8 Z! d( V1 F0 b
本来停车就不只是租个车位而已！

KLSEE

举脚赞成，但一旦通过此法案，停车场负责人难免会以保护汽车安全为藉口，乘机提高停车费

neveraskme89

早就该酱办啦！什么park at your own risk?!根本就是无理取闹！给了那么贵的钱！尤其在KL！还要酱对我们？

knightrider82

i think only car the car insurans company and the stupid car park centre will disagree only.5.39.217.76" l. X& _/ `& s# {+ J6 y: ^5 X
for all the ppl that drive and park sure will 120% agree with that,we pay for the parking rate no matter they charge hour or daily,some more they did't give a nice attitude for it,showing those black face to us when we try ask.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。) L) Z6 C) R- U' j
sometime car got steel from the parking area,sure they must take respon on it.
  d1 C9 m  g  T/ `2 l公仔箱論壇some more i being park my car at kl area most happening shopping mall then get scathe on my car body and i go find them to ask bout it,they just tell me that" i don't know when it happen,this car park is like this 1,got problem car owner must take it own risk"公仔箱論壇( Y0 W( a6 r$ X: T1 w. t
NOT FAIR