英超聯宣佈曼聯無須把軒斯交易至利物浦.
聽證會認為軒斯手中的信件並沒有產生一項具有約束力的協議, 要曼聯出售該名球員.
曼聯已明確表示不會讓這名阿根廷後衛轉投利物浦.
軒斯仍然可以向英超聯的上訴委員會提出上訴.
-----------------
Manchester United's Gabriel Heinze has lost his attempt to force the club to allow him to move to rivals Liverpool.
United disputed claims from Heinze, 29, who said the Red Devils gave him written permission to pursue a transfer to another club for a fee of £6.8m.
But a Premier League arbitration panel concluded that the permission "was unambiguous in that it envisages only an international transfer".
Heinze has the right to appeal against the arbitration panel's decision.
However, with the transfer window due to shut on 31 August, he is short of time if he wants to leave Old Trafford.
The arbitration panel's verdict read: "The Premier League Board appointed panel have heard submissions of evidence from both parties and has ruled to dismiss the player's case.
"The hearing concluded that nature and intention of the disputed 13 June 2007 letter, especially when taken in context of verbal discussions and Manchester United FC's transfer policy, was unambiguous in that it envisages only an international transfer.
"Furthermore the hearing finds the letter constitutes an 'agreement to agree', and did not create an obligation or binding agreement for the club to transfer the player to any particular club."
United manager Sir Alex Ferguson and chief executive David Gill travelled to Monday's hearing in London to put their case.
The Old Trafford side said they did not want to sell Heinze to a Premier League rival.
They said they made it clear to the defender both orally and in writing that he would not be allowed to join one of their title competitors.
Transfers between the two north-west rivals are rare, and the last player to move from United to Liverpool was Phil Chisnal in 1962.
Any appeal will be heard by the Premier League's appeals committee.
-----------------
Quoted from BBC |
發表於 2007-8-21 09:59 PM
| 
發表於 2007-8-22 08:49 PM
|