well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.
* }9 i0 O2 w# E- ?' s" d7 {9 v1 b+ a w5 _( E/ i- k. @2 n
i have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.
& O* [9 N) m+ b) l! r. ?, P* ctvb now,tvbnow,bttvb1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary." ?$ X# J5 J/ `, ^$ m
2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing. |
發表於 2011-12-12 05:29 PM
| 
