well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.% N! p; k# u/ T0 Q1 u4 F
0 O% t: A/ o, l5.39.217.76i have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.
$ h0 I) n r$ K" G+ b: i. z% F1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary. g% r+ t3 J, V- H9 i; G% W
2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing. |
發表於 2011-12-12 05:29 PM
| 
