well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.
! L+ S8 j( t& O5 n; B0 rtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
- L7 Q9 M6 b1 \5 ^# W/ F) Q) Ktvb now,tvbnow,bttvbi have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.
5 K4 `3 }, e( x0 x. E! g+ ^) O DTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.
' H4 D h3 q% U9 q' B; a! iTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing. |
發表於 2011-12-12 05:29 PM
| 
