返回列表 回復 發帖

[時事討論] 保護消費人法案一旦通過‧停車場須對汽車負責

 ,  描述: 消費的我们对此事有和看法??
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
对!非常赞成6 v& v. N9 R' r
地方是你们的,但是钱是我们给的,为何还不负责任!tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb" l. v3 h" _1 x0 Y- R# O
本来停车就不只是租个车位而已!
1

評分次數

举脚赞成,但一旦通过此法案,停车场负责人难免会以保护汽车安全为藉口,乘机提高停车费
1

評分次數

早就该酱办啦!什么park at your own risk?!根本就是无理取闹!给了那么贵的钱!尤其在KL!还要酱对我们?
1

評分次數

i think only car the car insurans company and the stupid car park centre will disagree only.
2 O" u: r' }$ ~  S- p% W8 E/ xtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbfor all the ppl that drive and park sure will 120% agree with that,we pay for the parking rate no matter they charge hour or daily,some more they did't give a nice attitude for it,showing those black face to us when we try ask.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。5 s. t* f0 z/ \  e1 O; K  {
sometime car got steel from the parking area,sure they must take respon on it.
" t7 M3 V' n9 y1 g! B! m5.39.217.76some more i being park my car at kl area most happening shopping mall then get scathe on my car body and i go find them to ask bout it,they just tell me that" i don't know when it happen,this car park is like this 1,got problem car owner must take it own risk"公仔箱論壇# e6 H; I+ C# ^( a" j. F
NOT FAIR
1

評分次數

  • civicboy1969

返回列表